These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26843258)

  • 1. Technical Note: Independent component analysis for quality assurance in functional MRI.
    Astrakas LG; Kallistis NS; Kalef-Ezra JA
    Med Phys; 2016 Feb; 43(2):983-92. PubMed ID: 26843258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fully-automated quality assurance in multi-center studies using MRI phantom measurements.
    Davids M; Zöllner FG; Ruttorf M; Nees F; Flor H; Schumann G; Schad LR;
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 32(6):771-80. PubMed ID: 24602825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of ICA-AROMA and alternative strategies for motion artifact removal in resting state fMRI.
    Pruim RHR; Mennes M; Buitelaar JK; Beckmann CF
    Neuroimage; 2015 May; 112():278-287. PubMed ID: 25770990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial independent component analysis of functional MRI time-series: to what extent do results depend on the algorithm used?
    Esposito F; Formisano E; Seifritz E; Goebel R; Morrone R; Tedeschi G; Di Salle F
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 Jul; 16(3):146-57. PubMed ID: 12112768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Analysis on DQA protocol of fMRI].
    Tang H; Lin R; Wang C; Xing H; Gong Q
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 27(6):1247-50. PubMed ID: 21374973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ICA-AROMA: A robust ICA-based strategy for removing motion artifacts from fMRI data.
    Pruim RHR; Mennes M; van Rooij D; Llera A; Buitelaar JK; Beckmann CF
    Neuroimage; 2015 May; 112():267-277. PubMed ID: 25770991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On replacing the manual measurement of ACR phantom images performed by MRI technologists with an automated measurement approach.
    Panych LP; Chiou JY; Qin L; Kimbrell VL; Bussolari L; Mulkern RV
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):843-52. PubMed ID: 26395366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality control for quantitative multicenter whole-body PET/MR studies: A NEMA image quality phantom study with three current PET/MR systems.
    Boellaard R; Rausch I; Beyer T; Delso G; Yaqub M; Quick HH; Sattler B
    Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5961-9. PubMed ID: 26429271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated quality assurance routines for fMRI data applied to a multicenter study.
    Stöcker T; Schneider F; Klein M; Habel U; Kellermann T; Zilles K; Shah NJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2005 Jun; 25(2):237-46. PubMed ID: 15846770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physiological Contribution in Spontaneous Oscillations: An Approximate Quality-Assurance Index for Resting-State fMRI Signals.
    Hsu AL; Chou KH; Chao YP; Fan HY; Wu CW; Chen JH
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148393. PubMed ID: 26871897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MRI quality assurance using the ACR phantom in a multi-unit imaging center.
    Ihalainen TM; Lönnroth NT; Peltonen JI; Uusi-Simola JK; Timonen MH; Kuusela LJ; Savolainen SE; Sipilä OE
    Acta Oncol; 2011 Aug; 50(6):966-72. PubMed ID: 21767198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Supervised machine learning quality control for magnetic resonance artifacts in neonatal data sets.
    Ding Y; Suffren S; Bellec P; Lodygensky GA
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Mar; 40(4):1290-1297. PubMed ID: 30467922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Isolation and minimization of head motion-induced signal variations in fMRI data using independent component analysis.
    Liao R; McKeown MJ; Krolik JL
    Magn Reson Med; 2006 Jun; 55(6):1396-413. PubMed ID: 16676336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integration of EEG source imaging and fMRI during continuous viewing of natural movies.
    Whittingstall K; Bartels A; Singh V; Kwon S; Logothetis NK
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Oct; 28(8):1135-42. PubMed ID: 20579829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of TCA and ICA techniques in fMRI data processing.
    Zhao X; Glahn D; Tan LH; Li N; Xiong J; Gao JH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Apr; 19(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 15065162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A two-compartment gel phantom for optimization and quality assurance in clinical BOLD fMRI.
    Olsrud J; Nilsson A; Mannfolk P; Waites A; Ståhlberg F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Feb; 26(2):279-86. PubMed ID: 17728091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality control of CT systems by automated monitoring of key performance indicators: a two-year study.
    Nowik P; Bujila R; Poludniowski G; Fransson A
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 16(4):254–265. PubMed ID: 26219012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Report on a multicenter fMRI quality assurance protocol.
    Friedman L; Glover GH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jun; 23(6):827-39. PubMed ID: 16649196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ICA of full complex-valued fMRI data using phase information of spatial maps.
    Yu MC; Lin QH; Kuang LD; Gong XF; Cong F; Calhoun VD
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jul; 249():75-91. PubMed ID: 25857613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.