330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26843445)
1. Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: A multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer.
Sert BM; Boggess JF; Ahmad S; Jackson AL; Stavitzski NM; Dahl AA; Holloway RW
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 42(4):513-22. PubMed ID: 26843445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.
Ko EM; Muto MG; Berkowitz RS; Feltmate CM
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 18929400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year experience.
Mendivil AA; Rettenmaier MA; Abaid LN; Brown JV; Micha JP; Lopez KL; Goldstein BH
Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26409687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Introduction of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: impact on complications, costs and oncologic outcome.
Wallin E; Flöter Rådestad A; Falconer H
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 May; 96(5):536-542. PubMed ID: 28186616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Jin YM; Liu SS; Chen J; Chen YN; Ren CC
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193033. PubMed ID: 29554090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shazly SA; Murad MH; Dowdy SC; Gostout BS; Famuyide AO
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 138(2):457-71. PubMed ID: 26056752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a single-centre experience from India.
Sekhon R; Naithani A; Makkar P; R P; Sharma P; Rawal S; Goyal Y; Mitra S; Sharma A; Mehta A
J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):935-941. PubMed ID: 34709536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single-institution Experience of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes.
Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Achilarre MT; Garbi A; Patrono MG; Colombo N; Maggioni A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 27158094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Shah CA; Beck T; Liao JB; Giannakopoulos NV; Veljovich D; Paley P
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e82. PubMed ID: 29027400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience.
Cantrell LA; Mendivil A; Gehrig PA; Boggess JF
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 May; 117(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 20153886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution.
Doo DW; Kirkland CT; Griswold LH; McGwin G; Huh WK; Leath CA; Kim KH
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 30850169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and laparoscopic surgery: A separate meta-analysis of high-quality studies.
Zhang SS; Ding T; Cui ZH; Lv Y; Jiang RA
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jan; 98(4):e14171. PubMed ID: 30681582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot versus laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a comparison of the intraoperative and perioperative results of a single surgeon's initial experience.
Chong GO; Lee YH; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1145-9. PubMed ID: 23748178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center.
Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Rollo D; Tomaselli T; Aletti G; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Cardenas Rebollo JM; Maggioni A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 26825827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ["Learning curve" robotic radical hysterectomy compared to standardized laparoscopy assisted radical vaginal and open radical hysterectomy].
Pilka R; Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Neubert D
Ceska Gynekol; 2013 Jan; 78(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 23607379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
