170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26844019)
1. Cross-platform normalization of microarray and RNA-seq data for machine learning applications.
Thompson JA; Tan J; Greene CS
PeerJ; 2016; 4():e1621. PubMed ID: 26844019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-platform normalization enables machine learning model training on microarray and RNA-seq data simultaneously.
Foltz SM; Greene CS; Taroni JN
Commun Biol; 2023 Feb; 6(1):222. PubMed ID: 36841852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feature specific quantile normalization enables cross-platform classification of molecular subtypes using gene expression data.
Franks JM; Cai G; Whitfield ML
Bioinformatics; 2018 Jun; 34(11):1868-1874. PubMed ID: 29360996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MLSeq: Machine learning interface for RNA-sequencing data.
Goksuluk D; Zararsiz G; Korkmaz S; Eldem V; Zararsiz GE; Ozcetin E; Ozturk A; Karaagaoglu AE
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Jul; 175():223-231. PubMed ID: 31104710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Systematic Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Cell Phenotype Classification Using Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data.
Cao X; Xing L; Majd E; He H; Gu J; Zhang X
Front Genet; 2022; 13():836798. PubMed ID: 35281805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How does normalization impact RNA-seq disease diagnosis?
Han H; Men K
J Biomed Inform; 2018 Sep; 85():80-92. PubMed ID: 30041017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ordered quantile normalization: a semiparametric transformation built for the cross-validation era.
Peterson RA; Cavanaugh JE
J Appl Stat; 2020; 47(13-15):2312-2327. PubMed ID: 35707424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Standard machine learning approaches outperform deep representation learning on phenotype prediction from transcriptomics data.
Smith AM; Walsh JR; Long J; Davis CB; Henstock P; Hodge MR; Maciejewski M; Mu XJ; Ra S; Zhao S; Ziemek D; Fisher CK
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 21(1):119. PubMed ID: 32197580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benchmarking differential expression analysis tools for RNA-Seq: normalization-based vs. log-ratio transformation-based methods.
Quinn TP; Crowley TM; Richardson MF
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 19(1):274. PubMed ID: 30021534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Choice of library size normalization and statistical methods for differential gene expression analysis in balanced two-group comparisons for RNA-seq studies.
Li X; Cooper NGF; O'Toole TE; Rouchka EC
BMC Genomics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):75. PubMed ID: 31992223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of normalization and differential expression analyses using RNA-Seq data from 726 individual Drosophila melanogaster.
Lin Y; Golovnina K; Chen ZX; Lee HN; Negron YL; Sultana H; Oliver B; Harbison ST
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():28. PubMed ID: 26732976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic comparison of RNA-Seq normalization methods using measurement error models.
Sun Z; Zhu Y
Bioinformatics; 2012 Oct; 28(20):2584-91. PubMed ID: 22914217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. NormExpression: An R Package to Normalize Gene Expression Data Using Evaluated Methods.
Wu Z; Liu W; Jin X; Ji H; Wang H; Glusman G; Robinson M; Liu L; Ruan J; Gao S
Front Genet; 2019; 10():400. PubMed ID: 31114611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of normalization methods on the performance of supervised learning algorithms applied to HTSeq-FPKM-UQ data sets: 7SK RNA expression as a predictor of survival in patients with colon adenocarcinoma.
Shahriyari L
Brief Bioinform; 2019 May; 20(3):985-994. PubMed ID: 29112707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Normalization Methods for RNA-Seq Gene Expression Estimation.
Wu PY; Phan JH; Zhou F; Wang MD
IEEE Int Conf Bioinform Biomed Workshops; 2011 Nov; 2011():50-57. PubMed ID: 27532058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. visnormsc: A Graphical User Interface to Normalize Single-cell RNA Sequencing Data.
Tang L; Zhou N
Interdiscip Sci; 2018 Sep; 10(3):636-640. PubMed ID: 29280088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of normalization methods in mammalian microRNA-Seq data.
Garmire LX; Subramaniam S
RNA; 2012 Jun; 18(6):1279-88. PubMed ID: 22532701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Machine Learning Classifiers for Endometriosis Using Transcriptomics and Methylomics Data.
Akter S; Xu D; Nagel SC; Bromfield JJ; Pelch K; Wilshire GB; Joshi T
Front Genet; 2019; 10():766. PubMed ID: 31552087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comprehensive Assessments of RNA-seq by the SEQC Consortium: FDA-Led Efforts Advance Precision Medicine.
Xu J; Gong B; Wu L; Thakkar S; Hong H; Tong W
Pharmaceutics; 2016 Mar; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 26999190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Compendiums of cancer transcriptomes for machine learning applications.
Lim SB; Tan SJ; Lim WT; Lim CT
Sci Data; 2019 Oct; 6(1):194. PubMed ID: 31594947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
