These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26844664)
21. Telomere length in alcohol dependence: A role for impulsive choice and childhood maltreatment. Kang JI; Hwang SS; Choi JR; Lee ST; Kim J; Hwang IS; Kim HW; Kim CH; Kim SJ Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2017 Sep; 83():72-78. PubMed ID: 28599145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Interrelationships among parental family history of substance misuse, delay discounting, and personal substance use. VanderBroek L; Acker J; Palmer AA; de Wit H; MacKillop J Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2016 Jan; 233(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 26395990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A systematic assessment of delay discounting in relation to cocaine and nicotine dependence. García-Rodríguez O; Secades-Villa R; Weidberg S; Yoon JH Behav Processes; 2013 Oct; 99():100-5. PubMed ID: 23872502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative assessment of psychometric performance on the adjusting amounts versus the 21-item Monetary Choice Delay Discounting tasks among young adult substance users. González-Roz A; Martínez-Loredo V; Postigo Á; Yoon JH Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2024 Jun; 32(3):358-368. PubMed ID: 38010762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Domain-Specific Relationships in Sexual Measures of Impulsive Behavior. Mahoney CT; Lawyer SR Arch Sex Behav; 2018 Aug; 47(6):1591-1599. PubMed ID: 29696554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predicting domain-specific outcomes using delay and probability discounting for sexual versus monetary outcomes. Lawyer SR; Schoepflin FJ Behav Processes; 2013 Jun; 96():71-8. PubMed ID: 23500484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Application of a Brief Measure of Delay Discounting to Examine the Relationship Between Delay Discounting and the Initiation of Substance Use Among Adolescents. Richardson CG; Edalati H Subst Use Misuse; 2016; 51(4):540-4. PubMed ID: 26943476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-month stability of delay and probability discounting measures. Ohmura Y; Takahashi T; Kitamura N; Wehr P Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2006 Aug; 14(3):318-28. PubMed ID: 16893275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Less is more: Negative income shock increases immediate preference in cross commodity discounting and food demand. Mellis AM; Athamneh LN; Stein JS; Sze YY; Epstein LH; Bickel WK Appetite; 2018 Oct; 129():155-161. PubMed ID: 29959952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparing delay discounting rates when using the fill-in-the-blank and multiple-choice methods. Weatherly JN; Derenne A J Gen Psychol; 2011; 138(4):300-18. PubMed ID: 24836568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of second outcome on monetary discounting. Cox DJ; Dallery J Behav Processes; 2018 Aug; 153():84-91. PubMed ID: 29782906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Experiential Discounting Task is sensitive to cigarette-smoking status and correlates with a measure of delay discounting. Reynolds B Behav Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 17(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 16495721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Probability discounting of monetary gains and losses in opioid-dependent adults. Garami J; Moustafa AA Behav Brain Res; 2019 May; 364():334-339. PubMed ID: 30768996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A meta-analysis of nonsystematic responding in delay and probability reward discounting. Smith KR; Lawyer SR; Swift JK Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2018 Feb; 26(1):94-107. PubMed ID: 29389172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Delay Discounting and Probability Discounting, But Not Response Inhibition, Are Associated With Sexual Risk Taking in Adults. Lawyer SR; Mahoney CT J Sex Res; 2018 Sep; 55(7):863-870. PubMed ID: 28796535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of reinforcer magnitude on probability and delay discounting of experienced outcomes in a computer game task in humans. Greenhow AK; Hunt MJ; Macaskill AC; Harper DN J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Sep; 104(2):186-97. PubMed ID: 26377438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of potentially real versus hypothetical food outcomes in delay and probability discounting tasks. Robertson SH; Rasmussen EB Behav Processes; 2018 Apr; 149():8-15. PubMed ID: 29366752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Delay discounting, treatment motivation and treatment retention among substance-dependent individuals attending an in inpatient detoxification program. Stevens L; Verdejo-García A; Roeyers H; Goudriaan AE; Vanderplasschen W J Subst Abuse Treat; 2015 Feb; 49():58-64. PubMed ID: 25245429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Queuing theory under competitive social foraging may explain a mathematical equivalence of delay and probability in impulsive decision-making. Takahashi T Med Hypotheses; 2006; 67(2):276-9. PubMed ID: 16574335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Delay and probability discounting of multiple commodities in smokers and never-smokers using multiple-choice tasks. Poltavski DV; Weatherly JN Behav Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 24(8):659-67. PubMed ID: 24196025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]