These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26845341)

  • 1. Johnny Depp, Reconsidered: How Category-Relative Processing Fluency Determines the Appeal of Gender Ambiguity.
    Owen HE; Halberstadt J; Carr EW; Winkielman P
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0146328. PubMed ID: 26845341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Caring or daring? Exploring the impact of facial masculinity/femininity and gender category information on first impressions.
    Walker M; Wänke M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0181306. PubMed ID: 29023451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness.
    Dixson BJ; Sulikowski D; Gouda-Vossos A; Rantala MJ; Brooks RC
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 29(11):2311-2320. PubMed ID: 27488414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Men's Preferences for Female Facial Femininity Decline With Age.
    Marcinkowska UM; Dixson BJ; Kozlov MV; Prasai K; Rantala MJ
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2017 Jan; 72(1):180-186. PubMed ID: 26320118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oxytocin administration leads to a preference for masculinized male faces.
    Theodoridou A; Rowe AC; Rogers PJ; Penton-Voak IS
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2011 Sep; 36(8):1257-60. PubMed ID: 21377804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human Face Tilt Is a Dynamic Social Signal That Affects Perceptions of Dimorphism, Attractiveness, and Dominance.
    Marshall P; Bartolacci A; Burke D
    Evol Psychol; 2020; 18(1):1474704920910403. PubMed ID: 32124644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of gender membership on sequential decisions of face attractiveness.
    Kondo A; Takahashi K; Watanabe K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1347-52. PubMed ID: 24037595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of facial attractiveness and facial masculinity/femininity in sex classification of faces.
    Hoss RA; Ramsey JL; Griffin AM; Langlois JH
    Perception; 2005; 34(12):1459-74. PubMed ID: 16457167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revealing Hidden Gender Biases in Competence Impressions of Faces.
    Oh D; Buck EA; Todorov A
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Jan; 30(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 30526301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring sexual dimorphism with a race-gender face space.
    Hopper WJ; Finklea KM; Winkielman P; Huber DE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):1779-88. PubMed ID: 25151105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sex-dimorphic face shape preference in heterosexual and homosexual men and women.
    Glassenberg AN; Feinberg DR; Jones BC; Little AC; Debruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2010 Dec; 39(6):1289-96. PubMed ID: 19830539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of type of facial stimuli.
    Rennels JL; Bronstad PM; Langlois JH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):884-93. PubMed ID: 18665733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new viewpoint on the evolution of sexually dimorphic human faces.
    Burke D; Sulikowski D
    Evol Psychol; 2010 Oct; 8(4):573-85. PubMed ID: 22947821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The perception of face gender: the role of stimulus structure in recognition and classification.
    O'Toole AJ; Deffenbacher KA; Valentin D; McKee K; Huff D; Abdi H
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Jan; 26(1):146-60. PubMed ID: 9519705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual differences in perceptions of gay men's sexual role preferences from facial cues.
    Tskhay KO; Re DE; Rule NO
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Nov; 43(8):1615-20. PubMed ID: 24906820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facial visualizations of women's voices suggest a cross-modality preference for femininity.
    Röder S; Fink B; Feinberg DR; Neave N
    Evol Psychol; 2013 Mar; 11(1):227-37. PubMed ID: 23531807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual dimorphism of male face shape, partnership status and the temporal context of relationship sought modulate women's preferences for direct gaze.
    Conway CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC
    Br J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 101(Pt 1):109-21. PubMed ID: 19460236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Relative Importance of Sexual Dimorphism, Fluctuating Asymmetry, and Color Cues to Health during Evaluation of Potential Partners' Facial Photographs : A Conjoint Analysis Study.
    Mogilski JK; Welling LL
    Hum Nat; 2017 Mar; 28(1):53-75. PubMed ID: 27752965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Associations among facial masculinity, physical strength, fluctuating asymmetry and attractiveness in young men and women.
    Van Dongen S
    Ann Hum Biol; 2014; 41(3):205-13. PubMed ID: 24555492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Q-cgi: new techniques to assess variation in perception applied to facial attractiveness.
    Burt DM; Kentridge RW; Good JM; Perrett DI; Tiddeman BP; Boothroyd LG
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Nov; 274(1627):2779-84. PubMed ID: 17848367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.