BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

492 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26845473)

  • 1. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy.
    Jover R; Zapater P; Bujanda L; Hernández V; Cubiella J; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Ono A; Lanas A; Seoane A; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Fernández-Díez S; Peris A; Nicolás-Pérez D; Murcia O; Castells A; Quintero E;
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 26845473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).
    Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M;
    Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate.
    Abdul-Baki H; Schoen RE; Dean K; Rose S; Leffler DA; Kuganeswaran E; Morris M; Carrell D; Mehrotra A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 26385276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics.
    Sarvepalli S; Garber A; Rothberg MB; Mankaney G; McMichael J; Morris-Stiff G; Vargo JJ; Rizk MK; Burke CA
    JAMA Surg; 2019 Jul; 154(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 30994911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal trends and variability of colonoscopy performance in a gastroenterology practice.
    le Clercq CM; Mooi RJ; Winkens B; Salden BN; Bakker CM; van Nunen AB; Keulen EP; de Ridder RJ; Masclee AA; Sanduleanu S
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 26808394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopist Fatigue May Contribute to a Decline in the Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy.
    Lee CK; Cha JM; Kim WJ
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 49(6):e51-6. PubMed ID: 25110871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variable Endoscopist performance in proximal and distal adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a retrospective cohort study.
    James P; Hegagi M; Hegagi M; Antonova L; Rostom A; Dube C; Murthy S; Goel R; Chatterjee A
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 May; 18(1):73. PubMed ID: 29848305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interval cancer after colonoscopy in the Austrian National Screening Programme: influence of physician and patient factors.
    Waldmann E; Penz D; Šinkovec H; Heinze G; Rinner C; Jiricka L; Majcher B; Hinterberger A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Gut; 2021 Jul; 70(7):1309-1317. PubMed ID: 33023903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Morning colonoscopies are associated with improved adenoma detection rates.
    Teng TY; Khor SN; Kailasam M; Cheah WK; Lau CC
    Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1796-803. PubMed ID: 26198158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Secondary Quality Indicator to Improve Prediction of Adenoma Miss Rate Apart from Adenoma Detection Rate.
    Aniwan S; Orkoonsawat P; Viriyautsahakul V; Angsuwatcharakon P; Pittayanon R; Wisedopas N; Sumdin S; Ponuthai Y; Wiangngoen S; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 111(5):723-9. PubMed ID: 26809333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
    Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monitoring colonoscopy withdrawal time significantly improves the adenoma detection rate and the performance of endoscopists.
    Vavricka SR; Sulz MC; Degen L; Rechner R; Manz M; Biedermann L; Beglinger C; Peter S; Safroneeva E; Rogler G; Schoepfer AM
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 26808396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Volume and accreditation, but not specialty, affect quality standards in colonoscopy.
    Bhangu A; Bowley DM; Horner R; Baranowski E; Raman S; Karandikar S
    Br J Surg; 2012 Oct; 99(10):1436-44. PubMed ID: 22961527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of Colonoscopy Volume on Quality Indicators.
    Pace D; Borgaonkar M; Lougheed M; Marcoux C; Evans B; Hickey N; O'Leary M; Boone D; McGrath J
    Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016; 2016():2580894. PubMed ID: 27446831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of physicians with unusual performance in screening colonoscopy databases: a Bayesian approach.
    Stock C; Uhlmann L; Hoffmeister M; Laux G; Kieser M; Brenner H
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):646-654.e1. PubMed ID: 25523387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incidence of interval colorectal cancer attributable to an endoscopist in clinical practice.
    Ertem FU; Ladabaum U; Mehrotra A; Tehranian S; Shi Z; Saul M; Morris M; Crockett SD; Schoen RE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Oct; 88(4):705-711.e1. PubMed ID: 29803767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adenoma Detection Rate in Asymptomatic Patients with Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests.
    Kligman E; Li W; Eckert GJ; Kahi C
    Dig Dis Sci; 2018 May; 63(5):1167-1172. PubMed ID: 29468377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
    Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.
    Jover R; Zapater P; Polanía E; Bujanda L; Lanas A; Hermo JA; Cubiella J; Ono A; González-Méndez Y; Peris A; Pellisé M; Seoane A; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Ponce M; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Fernández-Díez S; Arenas J; Sopeña F; de-Castro L; Vega-Villaamil P; Rodríguez-Soler M; Carballo F; Salas D; Morillas JD; Andreu M; Quintero E; Castells A;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):381-389.e1. PubMed ID: 23218945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by the timing of colonoscopy when performed in half-day blocks.
    Gurudu SR; Ratuapli SK; Leighton JA; Heigh RI; Crowell MD
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2011 Aug; 106(8):1466-71. PubMed ID: 21502998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.