These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26845744)

  • 21. A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research.
    Li G; Abbade LPF; Nwosu I; Jin Y; Leenus A; Maaz M; Wang M; Bhatt M; Zielinski L; Sanger N; Bantoto B; Luo C; Shams I; Shahid H; Chang Y; Sun G; Mbuagbaw L; Samaan Z; Levine MAH; Adachi JD; Thabane L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):181. PubMed ID: 29287585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. High prevalence of spin was found in pharmacovigilance studies using disproportionality analyses to detect safety signals: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Mouffak A; Lepelley M; Revol B; Bernardeau C; Salvo F; Pariente A; Roustit M; Cracowski JL; Khouri C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():73-79. PubMed ID: 34186195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Treatments for Glaucoma.
    Okonya O; Lai E; Ottwell R; Khattab M; Arthur W; Khaimi MA; Wright DN; Hartwell M; Vassar M
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Dec; ():235-241. PubMed ID: 33350656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of superior capsular reconstruction.
    Kim MS; Hasan LK; Fathi A; Hasan SK; Haratian A; Bolia IK; Petrigliano FA; Weber AE; Gamradt SC; Liu JN
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Aug; 31(8):1743-1750. PubMed ID: 35472573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A randomized trial of an editorial intervention to reduce spin in the abstract's conclusion of manuscripts showed no significant effect.
    Ghannad M; Yang B; Leeflang M; Aldcroft A; Bossuyt PM; Schroter S; Boutron I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Feb; 130():69-77. PubMed ID: 33096222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers' interpretation: a randomized controlled trial.
    Yavchitz A; Ravaud P; Hopewell S; Baron G; Boutron I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Nov; 14():123. PubMed ID: 25420433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.
    Hennessy EA; Tanner-Smith EE; Finch AJ; Sathe N; Kugley S
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-86. PubMed ID: 37131375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of "Spin" in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Therapeutic Interventions Published in High-Impact Plastic Surgery Journals: A Systematic Review.
    Gallo L; Yuan M; Gallo M; Chin B; Huynh MNQ; McRae M; McRae M; Coroneos CJ; Thoma A; Voineskos SH
    Aesthet Surg J; 2022 Apr; ():1332-1342. PubMed ID: 35466993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation issues (SPIN) in abstracts of orthodontic meta-analyses published from 2000 to 2020.
    Makou O; Eliades T; Koletsi D
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Mar; ():567-575. PubMed ID: 33740054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations.
    Hutton B; Salanti G; Caldwell DM; Chaimani A; Schmid CH; Cameron C; Ioannidis JP; Straus S; Thorlund K; Jansen JP; Mulrow C; Catalá-López F; Gøtzsche PC; Dickersin K; Boutron I; Altman DG; Moher D
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Jun; 162(11):777-84. PubMed ID: 26030634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Misleading Reporting (Spin) in Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trials in Oncology With Statistically Not Significant Results: A Systematic Review.
    Ito C; Hashimoto A; Uemura K; Oba K
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Dec; 4(12):e2135765. PubMed ID: 34874407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery needs improvement: a systematic review.
    Tan WK; Wigley J; Shantikumar S
    Int J Surg; 2014 Dec; 12(12):1262-5. PubMed ID: 25448643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Eight in Every 10 Abstracts of Low Back Pain Systematic Reviews Presented Spin and Inconsistencies With the Full Text: An Analysis of 66 Systematic Reviews.
    Nascimento DP; Gonzalez GZ; Araujo AC; Moseley AM; Maher CG; Costa LOP
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2020 Jan; 50(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 31443622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.
    Thompson AA; Mayfield CK; Bashrum BS; Abu-Zahra M; Petrigliano FA; Liu JN
    Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil; 2023 Dec; 5(6):100808. PubMed ID: 37965531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perspective on Systematic Medical Literature Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
    Pepose JS; Foulks GN; Nelson JD; Erickson S; Lemp MA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 211():15-21. PubMed ID: 31811861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study.
    Wise A; Mannem D; Arthur W; Ottwell R; Greiner B; Srouji D; Wildes D; Hartwell M; Wright DN; Khojasteh J; Vassar M
    BMJ Open; 2022 Aug; 12(8):e049421. PubMed ID: 35918107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Strong heterogeneity of outcome reporting in systematic reviews.
    Sautenet B; Contentin L; Bigot A; Giraudeau B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():93-9. PubMed ID: 26774825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How to write a systematic review.
    Harris JD; Quatman CE; Manring MM; Siston RA; Flanigan DC
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Nov; 42(11):2761-8. PubMed ID: 23925575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.