These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26845744)
61. Systematic review and meta-analysis: tools for the information age. Weatherall M Postgrad Med J; 2017 Nov; 93(1105):696-703. PubMed ID: 28756408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Extent and prevalence of spin in randomized controlled trials in dentistry. Eleftheriadi I; Ioannou T; Pandis N J Dent; 2020 Sep; 100():103433. PubMed ID: 32687962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (with examples from the MUDS study). Mayo-Wilson E; Li T; Fusco N; Dickersin K; Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 29057573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol. Ruano J; Gómez-García F; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Alcalde-Mellado P; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Viguera-Guerra I; Franco-García F; Cárdenas-Aranzana M; Romero JLH; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Isla-Tejera B; Garcia-Nieto AV Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 29523200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Systematic reviews on the success of dental implants present low spin of information but may be better reported and interpreted: An overview of systematic reviews with meta-analysis. de Lucena Alves CP; Vetromilla BM; Moreno LB; Helal L; Sarkis-Onofre R; Pereira-Cenci T Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Feb; 24(1):105-115. PubMed ID: 35043577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. When to include clinical study reports and regulatory documents in systematic reviews. Jefferson T; Doshi P; Boutron I; Golder S; Heneghan C; Hodkinson A; Jones M; Lefebvre C; Stewart LA BMJ Evid Based Med; 2018 Dec; 23(6):210-217. PubMed ID: 30309870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. The presence of spin in systematic reviews focused on diabetic neuropathy: A cross-sectional analysis. Khan A; Riley H; Ottwell R; Arthur W; Greiner B; Shapiro E; Wright D; Hartwell M; Chen S; Miao Z; Chronister S; Vassar M PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274744. PubMed ID: 36162079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. 'Spin' in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review. Chiu K; Grundy Q; Bero L PLoS Biol; 2017 Sep; 15(9):e2002173. PubMed ID: 28892482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines. Kelly SE; Moher D; Clifford TJ Syst Rev; 2016 May; 5():79. PubMed ID: 27160255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Risk of bias assessments for selective reporting were inadequate in the majority of Cochrane reviews. Saric F; Barcot O; Puljak L J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Aug; 112():53-58. PubMed ID: 31009658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Survey of systematic reviews in dentistry. Bader J; Ismail A; ; ; J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Apr; 135(4):464-73. PubMed ID: 15127870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar. Tian J; Zhang J; Ge L; Yang K; Song F J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 May; 85():50-58. PubMed ID: 28063911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Quality of abstract of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric dentistry journals. Pulikkotil SJ; Jayaraman J; Nagendrababu V Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2019 Oct; 20(5):383-391. PubMed ID: 30887462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. A Critical Analysis of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Peyronie's Disease Literature. Bole R; Gottlich HC; Ziegelmann MJ; Corrigan D; Levine LA; Mulhall JP; Bajic P J Sex Med; 2022 Apr; 19(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 35177375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. [Systematic reviews and metaanalyses. Basic knowledge, strengths and weaknesses of an important tool for healthcare professionals]. Schnabel A; Kranke P Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2010 Jul; 45(7-8):510-8. PubMed ID: 20665362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. The Quality of the Evidence According to GRADE Is Predominantly Low or Very Low in Oral Health Systematic Reviews. Pandis N; Fleming PS; Worthington H; Salanti G PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131644. PubMed ID: 26162076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]