These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26847236)

  • 1. Assessing within-woman changes in mammographic density: a comparison of fully versus semi-automated area-based approaches.
    Busana MC; De Stavola BL; Sovio U; Li J; Moss S; Humphreys K; dos-Santos-Silva I
    Cancer Causes Control; 2016 Apr; 27(4):481-91. PubMed ID: 26847236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of fully and semi-automated area-based methods for measuring mammographic density and predicting breast cancer risk.
    Sovio U; Li J; Aitken Z; Humphreys K; Czene K; Moss S; Hall P; McCormack V; dos-Santos-Silva I
    Br J Cancer; 2014 Apr; 110(7):1908-16. PubMed ID: 24556624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case-control study of six alternative density assessment methods.
    Eng A; Gallant Z; Shepherd J; McCormack V; Li J; Dowsett M; Vinnicombe S; Allen S; dos-Santos-Silva I
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Sep; 16(5):439. PubMed ID: 25239205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of a fully automated, high-throughput mammographic density measurement tool for use with processed digital mammograms.
    Couwenberg AM; Verkooijen HM; Li J; Pijnappel RM; Charaghvandi KR; Hartman M; van Gils CH
    Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Aug; 25(8):1037-43. PubMed ID: 24962023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproductive factors and mammographic density within the International Consortium of Mammographic Density: A cross-sectional study.
    O'Driscoll J; Burton A; Maskarinec G; Perez-Gomez B; Vachon C; Miao H; Lajous M; López-Ridaura R; Eliassen AH; Pereira A; Garmendia ML; Tamimi RM; Bertrand K; Kwong A; Ursin G; Lee E; Qureshi SA; Ma H; Vinnicombe S; Moss S; Allen S; Ndumia R; Vinayak S; Teo SH; Mariapun S; Fadzli F; Peplonska B; Nagata C; Stone J; Hopper JL; Giles G; Ozmen V; Aribal ME; Schüz J; Van Gils CH; Wanders JOP; Sirous R; Sirous M; Hipwell J; Kim J; Lee JW; Hartman M; Li J; Scott C; Chiarelli AM; Linton L; Pollan M; Flugelman AA; Salem D; Kamal R; Boyd N; Dos-Santos-Silva I; McCormack V; Mullooly M
    Breast Cancer Res; 2024 Sep; 26(1):139. PubMed ID: 39350230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-throughput mammographic-density measurement: a tool for risk prediction of breast cancer.
    Li J; Szekely L; Eriksson L; Heddson B; Sundbom A; Czene K; Hall P; Humphreys K
    Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Jul; 14(4):R114. PubMed ID: 22846386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semi-automated and fully automated mammographic density measurement and breast cancer risk prediction.
    Llobet R; Pollán M; Antón J; Miranda-García J; Casals M; Martínez I; Ruiz-Perales F; Pérez-Gómez B; Salas-Trejo D; Pérez-Cortés JC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Sep; 116(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 24636804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness threshold better predicts breast cancer risk for full-field digital mammograms.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Yoon-Ho C; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Hopper JL; Song YM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Nov; 17():142. PubMed ID: 26581435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association of area- and volumetric-mammographic density and breast cancer risk in women of Asian descent: a case control study.
    Mariapun S; Ho WK; Eriksson M; Mohd Taib NA; Yip CH; Rahmat K; Hall P; Teo SH
    Breast Cancer Res; 2024 May; 26(1):79. PubMed ID: 38750574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of type of full-field digital image on mammographic density assessment and breast cancer risk estimation: a case-control study.
    Busana MC; Eng A; Denholm R; Dowsett M; Vinnicombe S; Allen S; Dos-Santos-Silva I
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Sep; 18(1):96. PubMed ID: 27670914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association between high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and change in mammographic density over time in the SWAN mammographic density subcohort.
    Makboon K; Gold EB; Harvey DJ; Butler LM; Habel LA
    Cancer Causes Control; 2015 Mar; 26(3):431-42. PubMed ID: 25604866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adjusting for BMI in analyses of volumetric mammographic density and breast cancer risk.
    Hudson S; Vik Hjerkind K; Vinnicombe S; Allen S; Trewin C; Ursin G; Dos-Santos-Silva I; De Stavola BL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):156. PubMed ID: 30594212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AutoDensity: an automated method to measure mammographic breast density that predicts breast cancer risk and screening outcomes.
    Nickson C; Arzhaeva Y; Aitken Z; Elgindy T; Buckley M; Li M; English DR; Kavanagh AM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2013; 15(5):R80. PubMed ID: 24020331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preliminary evaluation of the publicly available Laboratory for Breast Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software tool: comparison of fully automated area and volumetric density measures in a case-control study with digital mammography.
    Keller BM; Chen J; Daye D; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Aug; 17():117. PubMed ID: 26303303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer according to tumor characteristics and mode of detection: a Spanish population-based case-control study.
    Pollán M; Ascunce N; Ederra M; Murillo A; Erdozáin N; Alés-Martínez J; Pastor-Barriuso R
    Breast Cancer Res; 2013 Jan; 15(1):R9. PubMed ID: 23360535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The association of mammographic density with risk of contralateral breast cancer and change in density with treatment in the WECARE study.
    Knight JA; Blackmore KM; Fan J; Malone KE; John EM; Lynch CF; Vachon CM; Bernstein L; Brooks JD; Reiner AS; Liang X; Woods M; ; Bernstein JL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Mar; 20(1):23. PubMed ID: 29566728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproductive and lifestyle risk factors and mammographic density in Mexican women.
    Rice MS; Bertrand KA; Lajous M; Tamimi RM; Torres G; López-Ridaura R; Romieu I
    Ann Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 25(11):868-73. PubMed ID: 26475982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammographic breast density refines Tyrer-Cuzick estimates of breast cancer risk in high-risk women: findings from the placebo arm of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I.
    Warwick J; Birke H; Stone J; Warren RM; Pinney E; Brentnall AR; Duffy SW; Howell A; Cuzick J
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Oct; 16(5):451. PubMed ID: 25292294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Li S; Trinh NH; Evans CF; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Dite GS; Stone J; English DR; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 30545395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer.
    Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Diao P; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():274. PubMed ID: 25884160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.