These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

544 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26847256)

  • 1. Doing peer review and receiving feedback: impact on scientific literacy and writing skills.
    Geithner CA; Pollastro AN
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2016 Mar; 40(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 26847256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Benefits of Peer Review and a Multisemester Capstone Writing Series on Inquiry and Analysis Skills in an Undergraduate Thesis.
    Weaver KF; Morales V; Nelson M; Weaver PF; Toledo A; Godde K
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2016; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 27789531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of electronic peer review of SOAP notes among pharmacy students enrolling in their first pharmacotherapeutics course.
    Chan A; Lee JY; Han Z
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2019 Dec; 11(12):1259-1264. PubMed ID: 31836151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Problem-based writing with peer review improves academic performance in physiology.
    Pelaez NJ
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2002 Dec; 26(1-4):174-84. PubMed ID: 12189125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of an 8-week high school science communication course designed to read, write, and present scientific research.
    Radyk MD; Spatz LB; Adkins-Threats ML; Cates K; St Pierre CL
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2023 Dec; 47(4):910-918. PubMed ID: 37769043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The design and implementation of an undergraduate health professional degree elective course on scientific writing, peer assessment, and critical appraisal.
    Osman A; Al-Badriyeh D; Hussain FN; Riaz S; Elewa H; Mraiche F
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2022 Jun; 14(6):765-772. PubMed ID: 35809907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A writing-intensive course improves biology undergraduates' perception and confidence of their abilities to read scientific literature and communicate science.
    Brownell SE; Price JV; Steinman L
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2013 Mar; 37(1):70-9. PubMed ID: 23471252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrating scientific literacy skills into a biochemistry course for nonscience majors.
    Taylor ATS
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2020 Jan; 48(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 31724817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blended learning within an undergraduate exercise physiology laboratory.
    Elmer SJ; Carter KR; Armga AJ; Carter JR
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2016 Mar; 40(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 26847259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Students' satisfaction and perceived impact on knowledge, attitudes and skills after a 2-day course in scientific writing: a prospective longitudinal study in Spain.
    Fernández E; García AM; Serés E; Bosch F
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e018657. PubMed ID: 29374664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-evaluation and peer-feedback of medical students' communication skills using a web-based video annotation system. Exploring content and specificity.
    Hulsman RL; van der Vloodt J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Mar; 98(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 25433967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using explicit teaching to improve how bioscience students write to the lay public.
    Moni RW; Hryciw DH; Poronnik P; Moni KB
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2007 Jun; 31(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 17562906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploration of Graduate Health Care Student Writing Skills Using a Transformational Learning Approach to a Literacy Enrichment Program.
    Gordon-Handler L; Dimitropoulou K; Hassan L; Masaracchio M; Waldman-Levi A
    J Allied Health; 2019; 48(3):201-208. PubMed ID: 31487359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The learner as co-creator: A new peer review and self-assessment feedback form created by student nurses.
    Duers LE
    Nurse Educ Today; 2017 Nov; 58():47-52. PubMed ID: 28869881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing.
    Guilford WH
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2001 Dec; 25(1-4):167-75. PubMed ID: 11824193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of objective structured self-assessment and peer-feedback (OSSP) for learning communication skills: evaluation using a controlled trial.
    Perera J; Mohamadou G; Kaur S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2010 May; 15(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 19757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Teaching information literacy skills to sophomore-level biology majors.
    Thompson L; Blankinship LA
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2015 May; 16(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 25949754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Drafting and acting on feedback supports student learning when writing essay assignments.
    Freestone N
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Jun; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 19509394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Asynchronous Peer Review Feedback in an Undergraduate Nursing Course: What Students Can Teach Each Other About Writing.
    Brown LG; Cicchino A
    Nurse Educ; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 47(5):303-307. PubMed ID: 35503114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of self-assessment on test scores: student perceptions.
    Ramirez BU
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Sep; 34(3):134-6. PubMed ID: 20826767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.