These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26847456)

  • 1. Strategies of offspring investment and dispersal in a spatially structured environment: a theoretical study using ants.
    Cronin AL; Loeuille N; Monnin T
    BMC Ecol; 2016 Feb; 16():4. PubMed ID: 26847456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coexistence of competitors in marine metacommunities: environmental variability, edge effects, and the dispersal niche.
    Aiken CM; Navarrete SA
    Ecology; 2014 Aug; 95(8):2289-302. PubMed ID: 25230479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimists or realists? How ants allocate resources in making reproductive investments.
    Enzmann BL; Nonacs P
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 Jul; 87(4):1126-1136. PubMed ID: 29687883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does disturbance favor dispersal? An analysis of ant migration using the colony-based lattice model.
    Nakamaru M; Beppu Y; Tsuji K
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Sep; 248(2):288-300. PubMed ID: 17583750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disturbance size and frequency mediate the coexistence of benthic spatial competitors.
    Castorani MCN; Baskett ML
    Ecology; 2020 Jan; 101(1):e02904. PubMed ID: 31562771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stabilization of species coexistence in spatial models through the aggregation-segregation effect generated by local dispersal and nonspecific local interactions.
    Detto M; Muller-Landau HC
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Dec; 112():97-108. PubMed ID: 27609405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coexistence of species with different dispersal across landscapes: a critical role of spatial correlation in disturbance.
    Liao J; Ying Z; Woolnough DA; Miller AD; Li Z; Nijs I
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 May; 283(1830):. PubMed ID: 27147101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial heterogeneity, source-sink dynamics, and the local coexistence of competing species.
    Amarasekare P; Nisbet RM
    Am Nat; 2001 Dec; 158(6):572-84. PubMed ID: 18707352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coexistence of specialist and generalist species is shaped by dispersal and environmental factors.
    Büchi L; Vuilleumier S
    Am Nat; 2014 May; 183(5):612-24. PubMed ID: 24739194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanisms of coexistence in competitive metacommunities.
    Amarasekare P; Hoopes MF; Mouquet N; Holyoak M
    Am Nat; 2004 Sep; 164(3):310-26. PubMed ID: 15478087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Composition of an avian guild in spatially structured habitats supports a competition-colonization trade-off.
    Rodríguez A; Jansson G; Andrén H
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Jun; 274(1616):1403-11. PubMed ID: 17389222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linking metacommunity paradigms to spatial coexistence mechanisms.
    Shoemaker LG; Melbourne BA
    Ecology; 2016 Sep; 97(9):2436-2446. PubMed ID: 27859071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial variation in egg size and egg number reflects trade-offs and bet-hedging in a freshwater fish.
    Morrongiello JR; Bond NR; Crook DA; Wong BB
    J Anim Ecol; 2012 Jul; 81(4):806-17. PubMed ID: 22309288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On testing the competition-colonization trade-off in a multispecies assemblage.
    Cadotte MW; Mai DV; Jantz S; Collins MD; Keele M; Drake JA
    Am Nat; 2006 Nov; 168(5):704-9. PubMed ID: 17080367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments.
    Chesson P
    Theor Popul Biol; 2000 Nov; 58(3):211-37. PubMed ID: 11120650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mutualism between consumers and their shared resource can promote competitive coexistence.
    Lee CT; Inouye BD
    Am Nat; 2010 Mar; 175(3):277-88. PubMed ID: 20100105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How the spatial scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity interact to affect coexistence.
    Snyder RE; Chesson P
    Am Nat; 2004 Nov; 164(5):633-50. PubMed ID: 15540153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determinism in a transient assemblage: the roles of dispersal and local competition.
    Friedenberg NA
    Am Nat; 2003 Nov; 162(5):586-96. PubMed ID: 14618537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The evolution of the competition-dispersal trade-off affects α- and β-diversity in a heterogeneous metacommunity.
    Laroche F; Jarne P; Perrot T; Massol F
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Apr; 283(1829):. PubMed ID: 27122564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dendritic network structure constrains metacommunity properties in riverine ecosystems.
    Brown BL; Swan CM
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 May; 79(3):571-80. PubMed ID: 20180874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.