These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26847739)

  • 1. Accessing totally implantable venous access systems on the day of placement does not significantly increase the risk of infection.
    Young SJ; Young LJ; Vogel J; Sutkowski R; Venkataperumal S
    J Vasc Access; 2016 May; 17(3):261-4. PubMed ID: 26847739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implanting totally implantable venous access ports in the upper arm is feasible and safe for patients with early breast cancer.
    Xu H; Chen R; Jiang C; You S; Zhu Q; Li Y; Li S; Zha X; Wang J
    J Vasc Access; 2020 Sep; 21(5):609-614. PubMed ID: 31841061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical outcomes of totally implantable venous access port placement via the axillary vein in patients with head and neck malignancy.
    Hong S; Seo TS; Song MG; Seol HY; Suh SI; Ryoo IS
    J Vasc Access; 2019 Mar; 20(2):134-139. PubMed ID: 29923460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complication-related removal of totally implantable venous access port systems: Does the interval between placement and first use and the neutropenia-inducing potential of chemotherapy regimens influence their incidence? A four-year prospective study of 4045 patients.
    Kakkos A; Bresson L; Hudry D; Cousin S; Lervat C; Bogart E; Meurant JP; El Bedoui S; Decanter G; Hannebicque K; Regis C; Hamdani A; Penel N; Tresch-Bruneel E; Narducci F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):689-695. PubMed ID: 27889197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk Factors for Early Port Infections in Adult Oncologic Patients.
    Skummer P; Kobayashi K; DeRaddo JS; Blackburn T; Schoeneck M; Patel J; Jawed M
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1427-1436. PubMed ID: 32792279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implantable venous ports in pediatric oncology: experience of single institution in Russia.
    Rykov MY; Polyakov VG
    J Vasc Access; 2016 Jul; 17(4):345-7. PubMed ID: 27151568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Severe Neutropenia at the Time of Implantable Subcutaneous Chest Port Insertion Is Not a Risk Factor for Port Removal at a Tertiary Pediatric Center.
    Hoss DR; Bedros AA; Mesipam A; Criddle J; Smith JC
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):398-402. PubMed ID: 28034702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of PICC complications in orthopedic inpatients with bone infection for long-term intravenous antibiotics therapy.
    Valbousquet Schneider L; Duron S; Arnaud FX; Bousquet A; Kervella Y; Bouzad C; Baccialone J; A'Teriitehau C; Potet J
    J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 25953205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do 'Videos' sections of Internet search engines provide accurate and adequate information about totally implantable venous access ports?
    Depboylu BC; Yazman S
    J Vasc Access; 2021 Mar; 22(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 32597358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Right- versus Left-Sided Chest Ports in Oncologic Patients with a History of Right-Sided Port Removal: Are There Any Differences in the Complication Rates?
    Sun D; Kobayashi K; Samuel M; Stewart G; Skummer P
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2019 May; 30(5):726-733. PubMed ID: 30928486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peripherally inserted central catheter-related complications in cancer patients: a prospective study of over 50,000 catheter days.
    Kang J; Chen W; Sun W; Ge R; Li H; Ma E; Su Q; Cheng F; Hong J; Zhang Y; Lei C; Wang X; Jin A; Liu W
    J Vasc Access; 2017 Mar; 18(2):153-157. PubMed ID: 28218366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outpatient placement of subcutaneous venous access ports reduces the rate of infection and dehiscence compared with inpatient placement.
    Pandey N; Chittams JL; Trerotola SO
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):849-54. PubMed ID: 23582442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality-of-life assessment: arm TIVAD versus chest TIVAD.
    Burbridge B; Goyal K
    J Vasc Access; 2016 Nov; 17(6):527-534. PubMed ID: 27768211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incidence and risk factors for central venous access port-related infection in Chinese cancer patients.
    Wang TY; Lee KD; Chen PT; Chen MC; Chen YY; Huang CE; Kuan FC; Chen CC; Lu CH
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2015 Nov; 114(11):1055-60. PubMed ID: 26253646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Innominate vein stenosis in breast cancer patients after totally implantable venous access port placement.
    Song MG; Seo TS; Kang EY; Yong HS; Seo JH; Choi YY
    J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 25953212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Infectious complications of 393 peripherally implantable venous access devices in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients.
    Whigham CJ; Goodman CJ; Fisher RG; Greenbaum MC; Thornby JI; Thomas JW
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1999 Jan; 10(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 10872493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Infectious complications of implantable venous access devices in patients with sickle cell disease.
    Wagner SC; Eschelman DJ; Gonsalves CF; Bonn J; Sullivan KL
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Apr; 15(4):375-8. PubMed ID: 15064341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of a dual lumen port for automated red cell exchange in adults with sickle cell disease.
    Shrestha A; Jawa Z; Koch KL; Rankin AB; Xiang Q; Padmanabhan A; Karafin MS; Field JJ
    J Clin Apher; 2015 Dec; 30(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 25790325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power-injectable ports: safety during placement, therapeutic use, and contrast administration during computed tomography procedures.
    Alexander MD; Morrison HL
    J Vasc Access; 2012; 13(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 22610789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.
    Nosher JL; Bodner LJ; Ettinger LJ; Siegel RL; Gribbin C; Asch J; Drachtman RA
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.