These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26849028)
1. Investigation of the fatigue behavior of adhesive bonding of the lithium disilicate glass ceramic with three resin cements using rotating fatigue method. Yassini E; Mirzaei M; Alimi A; Rahaeifard M J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():62-69. PubMed ID: 26849028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interfacial fracture toughness of different resin cements bonded to a lithium disilicate glass ceramic. Hooshmand T; Rostami G; Behroozibakhsh M; Fatemi M; Keshvad A; van Noort R J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 22182467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate Ceramics Bonded to Enamel or Dentin Using Different Resin Cement Types and Film Thicknesses. Rojpaibool T; Leevailoj C J Prosthodont; 2017 Feb; 26(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 26505488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of surface treatments, thermocycling, and cyclic loading on the bond strength of a resin cement bonded to a lithium disilicate glass ceramic. Guarda GB; Correr AB; Gonçalves LS; Costa AR; Borges GA; Sinhoreti MA; Correr-Sobrinho L Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 22856682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations. Belli R; Geinzer E; Muschweck A; Petschelt A; Lohbauer U Dent Mater; 2014 Apr; 30(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 24553249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cyclic fatigue vs static loading for shear bond strength test of lithium disilicate and dentin substrates: A comparison of resin cement viscosities. Dapieve KS; Machry RV; Cadore-Rodrigues AC; Knorst JK; Pereira GKR; De Jager N; Valandro LF; Kleverlaan CJ Dent Mater; 2022 Dec; 38(12):1910-1920. PubMed ID: 36229280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival of resin infiltrated ceramics under influence of fatigue. Aboushelib MN; Elsafi MH Dent Mater; 2016 Apr; 32(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 26764178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of bond strength between leucite-based and lithium disilicate-based ceramics to dentin after cementation with conventional and self-adhesive resin agents. Rigolin FJ; Miranda ME; Flório FM; Basting RT Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2014; 27(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 25335361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution. Dartora G; Rocha Pereira GK; Varella de Carvalho R; Zucuni CP; Valandro LF; Cesar PF; Caldas RA; Bacchi A J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Dec; 100():103401. PubMed ID: 31445400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading. Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional Resin Cement and Self-adhesive Resin Cement bonded to Lithium Disilicate: An in vitro Study. Roy AK; Mohan D; Sunith M; Mandokar RB; Suprasidh S; Rajan S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Oct; 18(10):881-886. PubMed ID: 28989124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Residual interface tensile strength of ceramic bonded to dentin after cyclic loading and aging. Hernandez AI; Roongruangphol T; Katsube N; Seghi RR J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 18319092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are self-adhesive resin cements a valid alternative to conventional resin cements? A laboratory study of the long-term bond strength. Hitz T; Stawarczyk B; Fischer J; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I Dent Mater; 2012 Nov; 28(11):1183-90. PubMed ID: 22999370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of multiple firings on mechanical properties and resin bonding of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic. Meng H; Xie H; Yang L; Chen B; Chen Y; Zhang H; Chen C J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Dec; 88():362-369. PubMed ID: 30199839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shear bond strength of composite resin cements to lithium disilicate ceramics. Kumbuloglu O; Lassila LV; User A; Toksavul S; Vallittu PK J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Feb; 32(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15641979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of shear and tensile bond strength between dentin and ceramics using dual-polymerizing resin cements. Pekkan G; Hekimoglu C J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):242-52. PubMed ID: 19782827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of two processing techniques used to manufacture lithium disilicate ceramics on the degree of conversion and microshear bond strength of resin cement. Drumond AC; Paloco EA; Berger SB; González AH; Carreira AJ; D'Alpino PH; Tonetto MR; Souza LA; Guiraldo RD Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2020 Sep; 33(2):98. PubMed ID: 32920611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of endodontic access preparation on the failure load of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations. Qeblawi D; Hill T; Chlosta K J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 22024183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro evaluation of long-term bonding of Procera AllCeram alumina restorations with a modified resin luting agent. Blatz MB; Sadan A; Arch GH; Lang BR J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 12690351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of silane pretreatment on the immediate bonding of universal adhesives to computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing lithium disilicate glass ceramics. Yao C; Zhou L; Yang H; Wang Y; Sun H; Guo J; Huang C Eur J Oral Sci; 2017 Apr; 125(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 28233438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]