280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26849028)
1. Investigation of the fatigue behavior of adhesive bonding of the lithium disilicate glass ceramic with three resin cements using rotating fatigue method.
Yassini E; Mirzaei M; Alimi A; Rahaeifard M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():62-69. PubMed ID: 26849028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interfacial fracture toughness of different resin cements bonded to a lithium disilicate glass ceramic.
Hooshmand T; Rostami G; Behroozibakhsh M; Fatemi M; Keshvad A; van Noort R
J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 22182467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate Ceramics Bonded to Enamel or Dentin Using Different Resin Cement Types and Film Thicknesses.
Rojpaibool T; Leevailoj C
J Prosthodont; 2017 Feb; 26(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 26505488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of surface treatments, thermocycling, and cyclic loading on the bond strength of a resin cement bonded to a lithium disilicate glass ceramic.
Guarda GB; Correr AB; Gonçalves LS; Costa AR; Borges GA; Sinhoreti MA; Correr-Sobrinho L
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 22856682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations.
Belli R; Geinzer E; Muschweck A; Petschelt A; Lohbauer U
Dent Mater; 2014 Apr; 30(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 24553249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cyclic fatigue vs static loading for shear bond strength test of lithium disilicate and dentin substrates: A comparison of resin cement viscosities.
Dapieve KS; Machry RV; Cadore-Rodrigues AC; Knorst JK; Pereira GKR; De Jager N; Valandro LF; Kleverlaan CJ
Dent Mater; 2022 Dec; 38(12):1910-1920. PubMed ID: 36229280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival of resin infiltrated ceramics under influence of fatigue.
Aboushelib MN; Elsafi MH
Dent Mater; 2016 Apr; 32(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 26764178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of bond strength between leucite-based and lithium disilicate-based ceramics to dentin after cementation with conventional and self-adhesive resin agents.
Rigolin FJ; Miranda ME; Flório FM; Basting RT
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2014; 27(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 25335361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution.
Dartora G; Rocha Pereira GK; Varella de Carvalho R; Zucuni CP; Valandro LF; Cesar PF; Caldas RA; Bacchi A
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Dec; 100():103401. PubMed ID: 31445400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional Resin Cement and Self-adhesive Resin Cement bonded to Lithium Disilicate: An in vitro Study.
Roy AK; Mohan D; Sunith M; Mandokar RB; Suprasidh S; Rajan S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Oct; 18(10):881-886. PubMed ID: 28989124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Residual interface tensile strength of ceramic bonded to dentin after cyclic loading and aging.
Hernandez AI; Roongruangphol T; Katsube N; Seghi RR
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 18319092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are self-adhesive resin cements a valid alternative to conventional resin cements? A laboratory study of the long-term bond strength.
Hitz T; Stawarczyk B; Fischer J; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Dent Mater; 2012 Nov; 28(11):1183-90. PubMed ID: 22999370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of multiple firings on mechanical properties and resin bonding of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic.
Meng H; Xie H; Yang L; Chen B; Chen Y; Zhang H; Chen C
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Dec; 88():362-369. PubMed ID: 30199839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shear bond strength of composite resin cements to lithium disilicate ceramics.
Kumbuloglu O; Lassila LV; User A; Toksavul S; Vallittu PK
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Feb; 32(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15641979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of shear and tensile bond strength between dentin and ceramics using dual-polymerizing resin cements.
Pekkan G; Hekimoglu C
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):242-52. PubMed ID: 19782827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of two processing techniques used to manufacture lithium disilicate ceramics on the degree of conversion and microshear bond strength of resin cement.
Drumond AC; Paloco EA; Berger SB; González AH; Carreira AJ; D'Alpino PH; Tonetto MR; Souza LA; Guiraldo RD
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2020 Sep; 33(2):98. PubMed ID: 32920611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of endodontic access preparation on the failure load of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations.
Qeblawi D; Hill T; Chlosta K
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 22024183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro evaluation of long-term bonding of Procera AllCeram alumina restorations with a modified resin luting agent.
Blatz MB; Sadan A; Arch GH; Lang BR
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 12690351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of silane pretreatment on the immediate bonding of universal adhesives to computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing lithium disilicate glass ceramics.
Yao C; Zhou L; Yang H; Wang Y; Sun H; Guo J; Huang C
Eur J Oral Sci; 2017 Apr; 125(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 28233438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
