These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26849094)

  • 1. A randomised cross-over trial comparing the McGrath(®) Series 5 videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with cervical spine immobilisation.
    Foulds LT; McGuire BE; Shippey BJ
    Anaesthesia; 2016 Apr; 71(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26849094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing tracheal intubation plus manual in-line stabilisation of the cervical spine using the Macintosh laryngoscope vs the McGrath(®) Series 5 videolaryngoscope.
    Ilyas S; Symons J; Bradley WP; Segal R; Taylor H; Lee K; Balkin M; Bain C; Ng I
    Anaesthesia; 2014 Dec; 69(12):1345-50. PubMed ID: 25087907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tracheal Intubation with a McGrath® Series 5 Video Laryngoscope by Novice Personnel in a Cervical-immobilized Manikin.
    Choi JW; Kim JA; Jung HJ; Kim WH
    J Emerg Med; 2016 Jan; 50(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 26432080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomised, controlled trial in patients with a simulated difficult airway.
    Taylor AM; Peck M; Launcelott S; Hung OR; Law JA; MacQuarrie K; McKeen D; George RB; Ngan J
    Anaesthesia; 2013 Feb; 68(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 23121470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the ease of tracheal intubation using a McGrath MAC(®) laryngoscope and a standard Macintosh laryngoscope.
    Wallace CD; Foulds LT; McLeod GA; Younger RA; McGuire BE
    Anaesthesia; 2015 Nov; 70(11):1281-5. PubMed ID: 26336853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tracheal tube placement in patients with a good glottic view at direct laryngoscopy.
    Yao WL; Wan L; Xu H; Qian W; Wang XR; Tian YK; Zhang CH
    Anaesthesia; 2015 Jul; 70(7):810-7. PubMed ID: 25721326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized crossover trial comparing cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope versus a C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope in a simulated immobilized cervical spine.
    Paik H; Park HP
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):201. PubMed ID: 32799791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study.
    Madziala M; Smereka J; Dabrowski M; Leung S; Ruetzler K; Szarpak L
    Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Jun; 176(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 28429117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical Spine Motion During Tracheal Intubation Using an Optiscope Versus the McGrath Videolaryngoscope in Patients With Simulated Cervical Immobilization: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Study.
    Nam K; Lee Y; Park HP; Chung J; Yoon HK; Kim TK
    Anesth Analg; 2019 Dec; 129(6):1666-1672. PubMed ID: 31743188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial.
    Yi IK; Kwak HJ; Lee KC; Lee JH; Min SK; Kim JY
    Eur J Med Res; 2020 Aug; 25(1):35. PubMed ID: 32819444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of different video laryngoscopes for emergency intubation in a standardized airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by experienced anaesthetists. A randomized, controlled crossover trial.
    Wetsch WA; Spelten O; Hellmich M; Carlitscheck M; Padosch SA; Lier H; Böttiger BW; Hinkelbein J
    Resuscitation; 2012 Jun; 83(6):740-5. PubMed ID: 22155448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the first-attempt tracheal intubation success of the hyperangulated McGrath® X-blade vs the Macintosh-type CMAC videolaryngoscope in patients with cervical immobilization: a two-centre randomized controlled trial.
    Zhang J; Tan LZ; Toh H; Foo CW; Wijeratne S; Hu H; Seet E
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2022 Aug; 36(4):1139-1145. PubMed ID: 34347225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraocular pressure changes: the McGrath video laryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope; a randomized trial.
    Karaman T; Dogru S; Karaman S; Demir S; Kaya Z; Suren M; Arici S; Kahveci M; Alim S
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Nov; 34():358-64. PubMed ID: 27687410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. McGRATH MAC video laryngoscope for insertion of a transoesophageal echocardiography probe: A randomised controlled trial.
    Ishida T; Kiuchi C; Sekiguchi T; Tsujimoto T; Kawamata M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2016 Apr; 33(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 26575010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of McGrath and Macintosh laryngoscopes in novice users: a manikin study.
    Ray DC; Billington C; Kearns PK; Kirkbride R; Mackintosh K; Reeve CS; Robinson N; Stewart CJ; Trudeau T
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Nov; 64(11):1207-10. PubMed ID: 19825056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized controlled trial of intubation with the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope by inexperienced anaesthetists.
    Walker L; Brampton W; Halai M; Hoy C; Lee E; Scott I; McLernon DJ
    Br J Anaesth; 2009 Sep; 103(3):440-5. PubMed ID: 19605408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated tracheal intubation scenarios.
    Kim HJ; Chung SP; Park IC; Cho J; Lee HS; Park YS
    Emerg Med J; 2008 May; 25(5):279-82. PubMed ID: 18434462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Success rates and endotracheal tube insertion times of experienced emergency physicians using five video laryngoscopes: a randomised trial in a simulated trapped car accident victim.
    Wetsch WA; Carlitscheck M; Spelten O; Teschendorf P; Hellmich M; Genzwürker HV; Hinkelbein J
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 28(12):849-58. PubMed ID: 21986981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the conventional CMAC and the D-blade CMAC with the direct laryngoscopes in simulated cervical spine injury--a manikin study.
    Jain D; Dhankar M; Wig J; Jain A
    Braz J Anesthesiol; 2014; 64(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 24998112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope after failed direct laryngoscopy.
    Noppens RR; Möbus S; Heid F; Schmidtmann I; Werner C; Piepho T
    Anaesthesia; 2010 Jul; 65(7):716-20. PubMed ID: 20528841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.