These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26850417)

  • 1. Guidelines for reporting health economic research.
    Haddad FS; McLawhorn AS
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Feb; 98-B(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 26850417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.
    Husereau D; Drummond M; Petrou S; Carswell C; Moher D; Greenberg D; Augustovski F; Briggs AH; Mauskopf J; Loder E;
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):231-50. PubMed ID: 23538175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What Guidance are Economists Given on How to Present Economic Evaluations for Policymakers? A Systematic Review.
    Sullivan SM; Wells G; Coyle D
    Value Health; 2015 Sep; 18(6):915-24. PubMed ID: 26409620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials II-An ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force report.
    Ramsey SD; Willke RJ; Glick H; Reed SD; Augustovski F; Jonsson B; Briggs A; Sullivan SD
    Value Health; 2015 Mar; 18(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 25773551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are guidelines for peer-reviewing economic evaluations necessary? A survey of current editorial practice.
    Jefferson T; Demicheli V
    Health Econ; 1995; 4(5):383-8. PubMed ID: 8563836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic analysis in hand surgery.
    Myers J; McCabe S; Gohmann S
    J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Apr; 31(4):664-8. PubMed ID: 16632063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force.
    Sullivan SD; Mauskopf JA; Augustovski F; Jaime Caro J; Lee KM; Minchin M; Orlewska E; Penna P; Rodriguez Barrios JM; Shau WY
    Value Health; 2014; 17(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 24438712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [German recommendations for health care economic evaluation studies. Revised version of the Hannover consensus. Hannover Consensus Group].
    Med Klin (Munich); 2000 Jan; 95(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 10668346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Challenges in economic outcomes research.
    Cook JR
    Hepatology; 1999 Jun; 29(6 Suppl):23S-25S. PubMed ID: 10386079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health economic analysis of adult deformity surgery.
    McCarthy I; Hostin R; O'Brien M; Saigal R; Ames CP
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2013 Apr; 24(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 23561565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do health-care decision makers find economic evaluations useful? The findings of focus group research in UK health authorities.
    Hoffmann C; Stoykova BA; Nixon J; Glanville JM; Misso K; Drummond MF
    Value Health; 2002; 5(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 11918822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design, execution, interpretation, and reporting of economic evaluation studies in obstetrics.
    Vintzileos AM; Beazoglou T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 191(4):1070-6. PubMed ID: 15507923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review of Research Reporting Guidelines for Radiology Researchers.
    Cronin P; Rawson JV
    Acad Radiol; 2016 May; 23(5):537-58. PubMed ID: 26928069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
    Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.
    Husereau D; Drummond M; Petrou S; Carswell C; Moher D; Greenberg D; Augustovski F; Briggs AH; Mauskopf J; Loder E;
    BMJ; 2013 Mar; 346():f1049. PubMed ID: 23529982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of decision analytic modeling in the health economic assessment of spinal intervention.
    Edwards NC; Skelly AC; Ziewacz JE; Cahill K; McGirt MJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Oct; 39(22 Suppl 1):S16-42. PubMed ID: 25299257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.
    Husereau D; Drummond M; Petrou S; Carswell C; Moher D; Greenberg D; Augustovski F; Briggs AH; Mauskopf J; Loder E;
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):e1-5. PubMed ID: 23538200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Presentation of economic evaluation results.
    Chaikledkaew U; Teerawattananon Y
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jun; 91 Suppl 2():S66-73. PubMed ID: 19253489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.