These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26850561)

  • 1. Impact of the amount of straw provided to pigs kept in intensive production conditions on the occurrence and severity of gastric ulceration at slaughter.
    Herskin MS; Jensen HE; Jespersen A; Forkman B; Jensen MB; Canibe N; Pedersen LJ
    Res Vet Sci; 2016 Feb; 104():200-6. PubMed ID: 26850561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The dose-response relationship between the amount of straw provided on the floor and gastric ulceration of pars oesophagea in growing pigs.
    Jensen KH; Jørgensen L; Haugegaard S; Herskin MS; Jensen MB; Pedersen LJ; Canibe N
    Res Vet Sci; 2017 Jun; 112():66-74. PubMed ID: 28126603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Technopathies of the limbs in finishing pigs: risk factors, origin and impact on animal welfare. - Study phase 2].
    Hergt T; Ostner F; Klein S; Zöls S; Erhard M; Reese S; Ritzmann M; Patzkéwitsch D
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere; 2018 Dec; 46(6):368-377. PubMed ID: 30616275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of amount of straw on pig and pen hygiene in partly slatted flooring systems.
    Wallgren T; Lundeheim N; Gunnarsson S
    BMC Vet Res; 2020 Oct; 16(1):377. PubMed ID: 33028323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Continuous straw provision reduces prevalence of oesophago-gastric ulcer in pigs slaughtered at 170 kg (heavy pigs).
    Di Martino G; Capello K; Scollo A; Gottardo F; Stefani AL; Rampin F; Schiavon E; Marangon S; Bonfanti L
    Res Vet Sci; 2013 Dec; 95(3):1271-3. PubMed ID: 24012347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of long or chopped straw on pig behaviour.
    Lahrmann HP; Oxholm LC; Steinmetz H; Nielsen MB; D'Eath RB
    Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):862-70. PubMed ID: 25496522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Behaviour of liquid-fed growing pigs provided with straw in various amounts and frequencies.
    Oxholm LC; Steinmetz HV; Lahrmann HP; Nielsen MB; Amdi C; Hansen CF
    Animal; 2014 Nov; 8(11):1889-97. PubMed ID: 25076383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors in the housing environment of finisher pigs associated with the development of gastric ulcers.
    Amory JR; Mackenzie AM; Pearce GP
    Vet Rec; 2006 Feb; 158(8):260-4. PubMed ID: 16501157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A survey of straw use and tail biting in Swedish pig farms rearing undocked pigs.
    Wallgren T; Westin R; Gunnarsson S
    Acta Vet Scand; 2016 Dec; 58(1):84. PubMed ID: 27919291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of feed withdrawal prior to slaughter on prevalence of gastric ulcers in pigs.
    Eisemann JH; Morrow WE; See MT; Davies PR; Zering K
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2002 Feb; 220(4):503-6. PubMed ID: 11862983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cross-sectional study of the prevalence and associated risk factors for capped hock and the associations with bursitis in weaner, grower and finisher pigs from 93 commercial farms in England.
    KilBride AL; Gillman CE; Ossent P; Green LE
    Prev Vet Med; 2008 Mar; 83(3-4):272-84. PubMed ID: 17905453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Which is the most preventive measure against tail damage in finisher pigs: tail docking, straw provision or lowered stocking density?
    Larsen MLV; Andersen HM; Pedersen LJ
    Animal; 2018 Jun; 12(6):1260-1267. PubMed ID: 29094665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The "Real Welfare" scheme: Identification of risk and protective factors for welfare outcomes in commercial pig farms in the UK.
    Pandolfi F; Kyriazakis I; Stoddart K; Wainwright N; Edwards SA
    Prev Vet Med; 2017 Oct; 146():34-43. PubMed ID: 28992926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. More tail lesions among undocked than tail docked pigs in a conventional herd.
    Lahrmann HP; Busch ME; D'Eath RB; Forkman B; Hansen CF
    Animal; 2017 Oct; 11(10):1825-1831. PubMed ID: 28294097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of farm size on the prevalence of oesophagogastric lesions in pigs at slaughter in south-east Spain.
    Ramis G; Gómez S; Pallarés FJ; Muñoz A
    Vet Rec; 2004 Aug; 155(7):210-3. PubMed ID: 15368760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk factors for gastric ulcers in Australian pigs at slaughter.
    Robertson ID; Accioly JM; Moore KM; Driesen SJ; Pethick DW; Hampson DJ
    Prev Vet Med; 2002 Apr; 53(4):293-303. PubMed ID: 11937236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longitudinal gait development and variability of growing pigs reared on three different floor types.
    Stavrakakis S; Guy JH; Warlow OM; Johnson GR; Edwards SA
    Animal; 2014 Feb; 8(2):338-46. PubMed ID: 24308298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cross-sectional study of the prevalence of foot lesions in post-weaning pigs and risks associated with floor type on commercial farms in England.
    Gillman CE; KilBride AL; Ossent P; Green LE
    Prev Vet Med; 2009 Oct; 91(2-4):146-52. PubMed ID: 19545923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of diet particle size and feeding of H2-receptor antagonists on gastric ulcers in swine.
    Hedde RD; Lindsey TO; Parish RC; Daniels HD; Morgenthien EA; Lewis HB
    J Anim Sci; 1985 Jul; 61(1):179-86. PubMed ID: 2863244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of pen design on tail biting and tail-directed behaviour of finishing pigs with intact tails.
    Brandt P; Hakansson F; Jensen T; Nielsen MBF; Lahrmann HP; Hansen CF; Forkman B
    Animal; 2020 May; 14(5):1034-1042. PubMed ID: 31735187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.