These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Use of Electronic Medical Records for Research: New Ethical Challenges and Possible Solutions]. Meneses-Oliveira C Acta Med Port; 2019 May; 32(5):332-334. PubMed ID: 31166892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. US agencies plan research-ethics overhaul. Ledford H Nature; 2015 Sep; 525(7568):166. PubMed ID: 26354461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of escalating regulatory requirements on the conduct of clinical research. Gordon BG; Kessinger A; Mann SL; Prentice ED Cytotherapy; 2003; 5(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 12944237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical research 2: legal and ethical issues in research. Endacott R Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2004 Oct; 20(5):313-5. PubMed ID: 15450620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Research in emergency situations. The role of deferred consent. Levine RJ JAMA; 1995 Apr; 273(16):1300-2. PubMed ID: 7715046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Practice of Research Ethics in Lebanon and Qatar: Perspectives of Researchers on Informed Consent. Nakkash R; Qutteina Y; Nasrallah C; Wright K; El-Alti L; Makhoul J; Al-Ali K J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec; 12(5):352-362. PubMed ID: 28905673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Commentary: systems, rules and the costs of being ethical--a response to D. Chalmers and to S. Whitney and C. Schneider. Holm S J Intern Med; 2011 Apr; 269(4):403-6. PubMed ID: 21410789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Erosion of informed consent in U.S. research. Shepherd L; Macklin R Bioethics; 2019 Jan; 33(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 30474129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exception from informed consent for emergency research: drawing on existing skills and experience. Davis AM IRB; 1998; 20(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 11657584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Public health. Ethics and the conduct of public health surveillance. Fairchild AL; Bayer R Science; 2004 Jan; 303(5658):631-2. PubMed ID: 14752148 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Addressing low-risk comparative effectiveness research in proposed changes to US federal regulations governing research. Kass N; Faden R; Tunis S JAMA; 2012 Apr; 307(15):1589-90. PubMed ID: 22511685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The views of quality improvement professionals and comparative effectiveness researchers on ethics, IRBs, and oversight. Whicher D; Kass N; Saghai Y; Faden R; Tunis S; Pronovost P J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Apr; 10(2):132-44. PubMed ID: 25742674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An even safer safety net. Prentice E Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):46. PubMed ID: 11644996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Anticipated Ethics and Regulatory Challenges in PCORnet: The National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network. Ali J; Califf R; Sugarman J Account Res; 2016; 23(2):79-96. PubMed ID: 26192996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethics and Regulatory Challenges and Opportunities in Patient-Centered Comparative Effectiveness Research. Sugarman J Acad Med; 2016 Apr; 91(4):455-7. PubMed ID: 26826074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Promoting medical research without sacrificing patient autonomy: legal and ethical issues raised by the waiver of informed consent for emergency research. Carnahan SJ Oklahoma Law Rev; 1999; 52(4):565-91. PubMed ID: 12666673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]