280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26851134)
1. Integrated decision strategies for skin sensitization hazard.
Strickland J; Zang Q; Kleinstreuer N; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Choksi N; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Lowit A; Allen D; Casey W
J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Sep; 36(9):1150-62. PubMed ID: 26851134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multivariate models for prediction of human skin sensitization hazard.
Strickland J; Zang Q; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Allen D; Choksi N; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Casey W; Kleinstreuer N
J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Mar; 37(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 27480324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of skin sensitization potency using machine learning approaches.
Zang Q; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Bell S; Kleinstreuer N; Allen D; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Casey W; Strickland J
J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 37(7):792-805. PubMed ID: 28074598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-animal assessment of skin sensitization hazard: Is an integrated testing strategy needed, and if so what should be integrated?
Roberts DW; Patlewicz G
J Appl Toxicol; 2018 Jan; 38(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28543848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-animal methods to predict skin sensitization (II): an assessment of defined approaches
Kleinstreuer NC; Hoffmann S; Alépée N; Allen D; Ashikaga T; Casey W; Clouet E; Cluzel M; Desprez B; Gellatly N; Göbel C; Kern PS; Klaric M; Kühnl J; Martinozzi-Teissier S; Mewes K; Miyazawa M; Strickland J; van Vliet E; Zang Q; Petersohn D
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2018 May; 48(5):359-374. PubMed ID: 29474122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of combinations of in vitro sensitization test descriptors for the artificial neural network-based risk assessment model of skin sensitization.
Hirota M; Fukui S; Okamoto K; Kurotani S; Imai N; Fujishiro M; Kyotani D; Kato Y; Kasahara T; Fujita M; Toyoda A; Sekiya D; Watanabe S; Seto H; Takenouchi O; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1333-47. PubMed ID: 25824844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can currently available non-animal methods detect pre and pro-haptens relevant for skin sensitization?
Patlewicz G; Casati S; Basketter DA; Asturiol D; Roberts DW; Lepoittevin JP; Worth AP; Aschberger K
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Dec; 82():147-155. PubMed ID: 27569201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconstructed human epidermis-based testing strategy of skin sensitization potential and potency classification using epidermal sensitization assay and in silico data.
Mizumachi H; Suzuki S; Sakuma M; Natsui M; Imai N; Miyazawa M
J Appl Toxicol; 2024 Mar; 44(3):415-427. PubMed ID: 37846211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro testing strategy for assessing the skin sensitizing potential of "difficult to test" cosmetic ingredients.
Bergal M; Puginier M; Gerbeix C; Groux H; Roso A; Cottrez F; Milius A
Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Jun; 65():104781. PubMed ID: 32001296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian integrated testing strategy (ITS) for skin sensitization potency assessment: a decision support system for quantitative weight of evidence and adaptive testing strategy.
Jaworska JS; Natsch A; Ryan C; Strickland J; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
Arch Toxicol; 2015 Dec; 89(12):2355-83. PubMed ID: 26612363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing skin sensitization hazard in mice and men using non-animal test methods.
Urbisch D; Mehling A; Guth K; Ramirez T; Honarvar N; Kolle S; Landsiedel R; Jaworska J; Kern PS; Gerberick F; Natsch A; Emter R; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M; Sakaguchi H
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Mar; 71(2):337-51. PubMed ID: 25541156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Applicability of an Integrated Testing Strategy consisting of in silico, in chemico and in vitro assays for evaluating the skin sensitization potencies of isocyanates.
Ohtake T; Maeda Y; Hayashi T; Yamanaka H; Nakai M; Takeyoshi M
Toxicology; 2018 Jan; 393():9-14. PubMed ID: 29100879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison and validation of an in vitro skin sensitization strategy using a data set of 33 chemical references.
Clouet E; Kerdine-Römer S; Ferret PJ
Toxicol In Vitro; 2017 Dec; 45(Pt 3):374-385. PubMed ID: 28539215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-animal methods to predict skin sensitization (I): the Cosmetics Europe database.
Hoffmann S; Kleinstreuer N; Alépée N; Allen D; Api AM; Ashikaga T; Clouet E; Cluzel M; Desprez B; Gellatly N; Goebel C; Kern PS; Klaric M; Kühnl J; Lalko JF; Martinozzi-Teissier S; Mewes K; Miyazawa M; Parakhia R; van Vliet E; Zang Q; Petersohn D
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2018 May; 48(5):344-358. PubMed ID: 29474128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Activity of human contact allergens in the murine local lymph node assay.
Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Basketter DA; Lea L; Blaikie L; Dearman RJ; Warbrick EV; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Aug; 43(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 10945748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integrated skin sensitization assessment based on OECD methods (I): Deriving a point of departure for risk assessment.
Natsch A; Gerberick GF
ALTEX; 2022; 39(4):636-646. PubMed ID: 35404469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of in vitro assays for the assessment of the skin sensitization hazard of functional polysiloxanes and silanes.
Petry T; Bosch A; Coste X; Eigler D; Germain P; Seidel S; Jean PA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Mar; 84():64-76. PubMed ID: 28017767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Binary test battery with KeratinoSens™ and h-CLAT as part of a bottom-up approach for skin sensitization hazard prediction.
Otsubo Y; Nishijo T; Miyazawa M; Saito K; Mizumachi H; Sakaguchi H
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 88():118-124. PubMed ID: 28602621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Test battery with the human cell line activation test, direct peptide reactivity assay and DEREK based on a 139 chemical data set for predicting skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals.
Takenouchi O; Fukui S; Okamoto K; Kurotani S; Imai N; Fujishiro M; Kyotani D; Kato Y; Kasahara T; Fujita M; Toyoda A; Sekiya D; Watanabe S; Seto H; Hirota M; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1318-32. PubMed ID: 25820183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is a combination of assays really needed for non-animal prediction of skin sensitization potential? Performance of the GARD™ (Genomic Allergen Rapid Detection) assay in comparison with OECD guideline assays alone and in combination.
Roberts DW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Oct; 98():155-160. PubMed ID: 30048705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
