BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26851138)

  • 1. Evaluation of pigment location in tinted soft contact lenses.
    Jung JW; Han SH; Kim SA; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Jun; 39(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 26851138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of Pigment Location in Tinted Contact Lenses on the Ocular Surface.
    Jung JW; Han SH; Park SY; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 93(8):997-1003. PubMed ID: 27232903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the Lubricity and Surface Roughness of 5 Cosmetic Contact Lenses.
    Lau C; Tosatti S; Mundorf M; Ebare K; Osborn Lorenz K
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Nov; 44 Suppl 2(2):S256-S265. PubMed ID: 29570118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy analysis of daily disposable limbal ring contact lenses.
    Lorenz KO; Kakkassery J; Boree D; Pinto D
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Sep; 97(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 24689948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scanning Electron Microscopy Findings With Energy-Dispersive X-ray Investigations of Cosmetically Tinted Contact Lenses.
    Hotta F; Eguchi H; Imai S; Miyamoto T; Mitamura-Aizawa S; Mitamura Y
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Sep; 41(5):291-6. PubMed ID: 25799458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identifying Pigment Enclosure in Cosmetic Contact Lenses.
    Korde V; McDow K; Rollins D; Stinchcomb R; Esposito H
    Eye Contact Lens; 2020 Jul; 46(4):228-233. PubMed ID: 31313698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of manufacturing technology and material composition on the surface characteristics of hydrogel contact lenses.
    Maldonado-Codina C; Efron N
    Clin Exp Optom; 2005 Nov; 88(6):396-404. PubMed ID: 16329748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of tinted soft contact lens wear on functional visual acuity and higher-order aberrations.
    Watanabe K; Kaido M; Ishida R; Dogru M; Negishi K; Tsubota K
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Jun; 37(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 24721637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft contact lens surface profile by atomic force microscopy.
    Giraldez MJ; Serra C; Lira M; Real Oliveira ME; Yebra-Pimentel E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Jul; 87(7):E475-81. PubMed ID: 20473237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of Pigment Distribution and Depth Analysis Methods for Decorative Soft Contact Lenses.
    Nomura Y; Toida H; Fukui C; Kai S; Nakaoka R; Kato R; Uematsu M; Ono K; Kanai A; Haishima Y
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Nov; 44 Suppl 2():S105-S112. PubMed ID: 28953599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ToF-SIMS and AFM Characterization of Brown Cosmetic Contact Lenses: From Structural Analysis to the Identification of Pigments.
    Kim SH; Lee J; Jang YJ; Lee KB; Lee Y
    J Anal Methods Chem; 2020; 2020():6134627. PubMed ID: 32399310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. OCT Imaging of lid-parallel conjunctival folds in soft contact lens wearers.
    Tapasztó B; Veres A; Kosina-Hagyó K; Somfai GM; Németh J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Oct; 88(10):1206-13. PubMed ID: 21747307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. UV-vis light transmittance through tinted contact lenses and the effect of color on values.
    Osuagwu UL; Ogbuehi KC
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Jun; 37(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 24126153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. White light interferometry to characterize the hydrogel contact lens surface.
    Giraldez MJ; García-Resúa C; Lira M; Real Oliveira ME; Yebra-Pimentel E
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 May; 30(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 20444136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using optical coherence tomography to assess corneoscleral morphology after soft contact lens wear.
    Alonso-Caneiro D; Shaw AJ; Collins MJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Nov; 89(11):1619-26. PubMed ID: 23034339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of soft contact lens edge fitting using ultra-high resolution and ultra-long scan depth optical coherence tomography.
    Shen M; Cui L; Riley C; Wang MR; Wang J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 52(7):4091-7. PubMed ID: 21372023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The annular tinted contact lens syndrome: corneal topographic analysis of ring-shaped irregular astigmatism caused by annular tinted contact lenses.
    Bucci FA; Evans RE; Moody KJ; Tanner JB; Capozza RC; Klyce SD
    CLAO J; 1997 Jul; 23(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 9240826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of surface roughness and bacterial adhesion between cosmetic contact lenses and conventional contact lenses.
    Ji YW; Cho YJ; Lee CH; Hong SH; Chung DY; Kim EK; Lee HK
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jan; 41(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 25536530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surface roughness and refractive index changes in contact lens induced by lens care systems.
    Lira M; Franco S; Vazquez-Dorrio JB; Real Oliveira ME; Costa MF
    Eye Contact Lens; 2014 May; 40(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 24756118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Atomic force microscopy and Langmuir-Blodgett monolayer technique to assess contact lens deposits and human meibum extracts.
    Hagedorn S; Drolle E; Lorentz H; Srinivasan S; Leonenko Z; Jones L
    J Optom; 2015; 8(3):187-99. PubMed ID: 25620317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.