653 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26851559)
1. Assessment of mandibular posterior regional landmarks using cone-beam computed tomography in dental implant surgery.
de Souza LA; Souza Picorelli Assis NM; Ribeiro RA; Pires Carvalho AC; Devito KL
Ann Anat; 2016 May; 205():53-9. PubMed ID: 26851559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tomographic volume evaluation of submandibular fossa in patients requiring dental implants.
Parnia F; Fard EM; Mahboub F; Hafezeqoran A; Gavgani FE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jan; 109(1):e32-6. PubMed ID: 20123366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of Lingual Concavities in Submandibular Fossa Region in Patients requiring Dental Implants-A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
Rajput BS; Merita S; Parihar AS; Vyas T; Kaur P; Chansoria S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1329-1333. PubMed ID: 30602636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of bone width lateral to the mandibular canal as an alternative approach for implant installation.
Daróz SR; Cardoso ES; Manso MC; Vidigal GM
Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23303270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anatomical landmarks of mandibular interforaminal region related to dental implant placement with 3D CBCT: comparison between edentulous and dental mandibles.
Sener E; Onem E; Akar GC; Govsa F; Ozer MA; Pinar Y; Mert A; Baksi Sen BG
Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Jun; 40(6):615-623. PubMed ID: 29124343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cone beam computerized tomography-based dental imaging for implant planning and surgical guidance, Part 1: Single implant in the mandibular molar region.
Almog DM; LaMar J; LaMar FR; LaMar F
J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 16704109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior mandibular region: a virtual implant placement study using cone-beam computed tomography.
Chan HL; Benavides E; Yeh CY; Fu JH; Rudek IE; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2011 Jan; 82(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 20653440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationships between bone density values from cone beam computed tomography, maximum insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis at implant placement: a pilot study.
Fuster-Torres MÁ; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1051-6. PubMed ID: 22010089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
Ekestubbe A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mylohyoid Ridge as a Predictor of Available Bone for Implant Placement: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Retrospective Observational Study.
Madhok S; Kiruthika S; Prabhu K; Abraham S; Kabilan P; Nithyapriya S
Cureus; 2022 Jul; 14(7):e27470. PubMed ID: 36060375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tomographic evaluation on bone morphology in posterior mandibular region for safe placement of dental implant.
Yildiz S; Bayar GR; Guvenc I; Kocabiyik N; Cömert A; Yazar F
Surg Radiol Anat; 2015 Mar; 37(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 25078676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a virtual implant placement study.
Lin MH; Mau LP; Cochran DL; Shieh YS; Huang PH; Huang RY
J Dent; 2014 Mar; 42(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 24394585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A deep learning approach for dental implant planning in cone-beam computed tomography images.
Kurt Bayrakdar S; Orhan K; Bayrakdar IS; Bilgir E; Ezhov M; Gusarev M; Shumilov E
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 May; 21(1):86. PubMed ID: 34011314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between the position of the mental foramen and the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve as determined by cone beam computed tomography combined with mimics.
Chen Z; Chen D; Tang L; Wang F
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 25299797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using cone beam computed tomography to determine safe regions for implant placement.
Sokhn S; Nasseh I; Noujeim M
Gen Dent; 2011; 59(2):e72-7. PubMed ID: 21903512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Study on the necessity for cross-section imaging of the posterior mandible for treatment planning of standard cases in implant dentistry.
Frei C; Buser D; Dula K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):490-7. PubMed ID: 15248885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. To Assess and Evaluate the Variation of Mandibular Anatomy Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Before Planning an Implant Surgery: A Population-based Retrospective Study.
Kapoor V; Kumar N; Dahiya K; Sikka R; Sirana P; Singh A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1381-1385. PubMed ID: 30602645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cone-beam CT for preoperative implant planning in the posterior mandible: visibility of anatomic landmarks.
Lofthag-Hansen S; Gröndahl K; Ekestubbe A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):246-55. PubMed ID: 18783419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dental implant imaging: TeraRecon's Dental 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography System.
Garg AK
Dent Implantol Update; 2007 Jun; 18(6):41-5. PubMed ID: 17682685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study.
Froum S; Casanova L; Byrne S; Cho SC
J Periodontol; 2011 Mar; 82(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 20809864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
