These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26851685)

  • 1. Comparison of biochemical response between the minimally invasive and standard open posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Linzer P; Filip M; Jurek P; Šálek T; Gajdoš M; Jarkovský J
    Neurol Neurochir Pol; 2016; 50(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 26851685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of serum markers for muscle damage, surgical blood loss, postoperative recovery, and surgical site pain after extreme lateral interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws or traditional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ohba T; Ebata S; Haro H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Oct; 18(1):415. PubMed ID: 29037186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Biochemical Markers of Muscle Damage and Inflammatory Response Between the Open Discectomy, Microsurgical Discectomy, and Microsurgical Discectomy Using Tubular Retractor.
    Linzer P; Filip M; Šámal F; Kremr J; Šálek T; Gajdoš M; Jarkovský J
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2015 Sep; 76(5):384-91. PubMed ID: 26024471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mini-open versus conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of paraspinal muscle damage and slip reduction.
    Tsutsumimoto T; Shimogata M; Ohta H; Misawa H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):1923-8. PubMed ID: 19652636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach.
    Park Y; Ha JW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(5):537-43. PubMed ID: 17334287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intramuscular pressure of the multifidus muscle and low-back pain after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of mini-open and conventional approaches.
    Mukai Y; Takenaka S; Hosono N; Miwa T; Fuji T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Dec; 19(6):651-7. PubMed ID: 24074511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The quantitative analysis of tissue injury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion.
    Kim KT; Lee SH; Suk KS; Bae SC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(6):712-6. PubMed ID: 16540878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive approach versus traditional open approach for one level posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ntoukas V; Müller A
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2010 Feb; 53(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 20376740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Khoo LT; Palmer S; Laich DT; Fessler RG
    Neurosurgery; 2002 Nov; 51(5 Suppl):S166-81. PubMed ID: 12234445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.
    Shunwu F; Xing Z; Fengdong Z; Xiangqian F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Aug; 35(17):1615-20. PubMed ID: 20479702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Disk Disease and Spondylolisthesis Grade I: Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery.
    Brodano GB; Martikos K; Lolli F; Gasbarrini A; Cioni A; Bandiera S; Silvestre MD; Boriani S; Greggi T
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Dec; 28(10):E559-64. PubMed ID: 24136060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Significantly improved outcomes with a less invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion incorporating total facetectomy.
    Kasis AG; Marshman LA; Krishna M; Bhatia CK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 19282736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trans-foraminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical morbidity.
    Mehta VA; McGirt MJ; Garcés Ambrossi GL; Parker SL; Sciubba DM; Bydon A; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Witham TF
    Neurol Res; 2011 Jan; 33(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 20546682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of traumatic related index in serum between minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for tissue injury].
    Zou S; Wang J; Pan W; Zheng Y; Huang B
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 27(8):960-4. PubMed ID: 24171351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF/TLIF) for the treatment of localised segment degeneration of lumbar spine].
    Kunze B; Drasseck T; Kluba T
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2011 Jun; 149(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 21341184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscopy-assisted posterior lumbar interbody fusion in a single segment.
    Wang YT; Wu XT; Chen H; Wang C
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 21(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 24238828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monitoring the quality of robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine by using a cumulative summation test.
    Kim HJ; Lee SH; Chang BS; Lee CK; Lim TO; Hoo LP; Yi JM; Yeom JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 25575085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Clinical value of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion assisted by X-Tube system in the treatment of low back disorders].
    Fan SW; Fang XQ; Zhao X; Zhao FD
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 46(7):488-92. PubMed ID: 18785555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.