225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26851991)
1. A new proposal for priority setting in Norway: Open and fair.
Ottersen T; Førde R; Kakad M; Kjellevold A; Melberg HO; Moen A; Ringard Å; Norheim OF
Health Policy; 2016 Mar; 120(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 26851991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stakeholder views on criteria and processes for priority setting in Norway: a qualitative study.
Aidem JM
Health Policy; 2017 Jun; 121(6):683-690. PubMed ID: 28433324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Norwegian National Council for Priority Setting in Health Care: decisions and justifications.
Wester G; Bringedal B
Health Econ Policy Law; 2018 Apr; 13(2):118-136. PubMed ID: 28322184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Priority setting at the micro-, meso- and macro-levels in Canada, Norway and Uganda.
Kapiriri L; Norheim OF; Martin DK
Health Policy; 2007 Jun; 82(1):78-94. PubMed ID: 17034898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lifetime QALY prioritarianism in priority setting.
Ottersen T
J Med Ethics; 2013 Mar; 39(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 23204320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Oregon priority-setting exercise: quality of life and public policy.
Hadorn DC
Hastings Cent Rep; 1991; 21(3):S11-6. PubMed ID: 11642898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Priority setting in health policy in Sweden and a comparison with Norway.
Calltorp J
Health Policy; 1999 Dec; 50(1-2):1-22. PubMed ID: 10827297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making?
Kapiriri L; Norheim OF; Martin DK
Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(4):766-73. PubMed ID: 19070414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Priority setting in the Austrian healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment and implications for mental health.
Mentzakis E; Paolucci F; Rubicko G
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2014 Jun; 17(2):61-73. PubMed ID: 25153094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Priority setting in health care: unburdening from the burden of disease.
Mooney G; Irwig L; Leeder S
Aust N Z J Public Health; 1997 Dec; 21(7):680-1. PubMed ID: 9489181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethics and economics: does programme budgeting and marginal analysis contribute to fair priority setting?
Gibson J; Mitton C; Martin D; Donaldson C; Singer P
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2006 Jan; 11(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 16378530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Health economics and health policy: experiences from New Zealand.
Cumming J
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2015 Jun; 13(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 25583117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bottom-up priority setting revised. A second evaluation of an institutional intervention in a Swedish health care organisation.
Waldau S
Health Policy; 2015 Sep; 119(9):1226-36. PubMed ID: 25724824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Priority setting and personal health responsibility: an analysis of Norwegian key policy documents.
Traina G; Feiring E
J Med Ethics; 2022 Jan; 48(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 32122963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Health care priority setting in Norway a multicriteria decision analysis.
Defechereux T; Paolucci F; Mirelman A; Youngkong S; Botten G; Hagen TP; Niessen LW
BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Feb; 12():39. PubMed ID: 22335815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Priority setting in healthcare. What can Germany learn from other countries?].
Busse R; Hoffmann C
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2010 Sep; 53(9):882-9. PubMed ID: 20853084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Social preferences for prioritizing the treatment of severely ill patients: The relevance of severity, expected benefit, past health and lifetime health.
McKie J; Richardson J
Health Policy; 2017 Aug; 121(8):913-922. PubMed ID: 28622939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Rationing in German health care with particular consideration of oncology: view points of German stakeholders--a qualitative interview study].
Lange J; Gönner C; Vollmann J; Rauprich O
Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Jan; 77(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 24696371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Roles and responsibilities of clinical ethics committees in priority setting.
Magelssen M; Miljeteig I; Pedersen R; Førde R
BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):68. PubMed ID: 29191186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Against proportional shortfall as a priority-setting principle.
Altmann S
J Med Ethics; 2018 May; 44(5):305-309. PubMed ID: 29321220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
