These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26852284)

  • 1. Risk of bias does not differ between full papers and letters reporting dermatological randomized controlled trials.
    Chauhan DN; Wilkes SR; Ratib S; Doney E; Batchelor JM; Rogers NK; Williams HC
    Br J Dermatol; 2016 Jul; 175(1):210-1. PubMed ID: 26852284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized trials in top dermatological journals, 2009-13.
    Romero-Pérez D; Ramos JM; Encabo B; Belinchón I
    Br J Dermatol; 2016 Nov; 175(5):1089-1093. PubMed ID: 26639671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CONSORT adoption and quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: a systematic analysis in two dermatology journals.
    Alvarez F; Meyer N; Gourraud PA; Paul C
    Br J Dermatol; 2009 Nov; 161(5):1159-65. PubMed ID: 19681881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical trials and study reporting - CONSORT guidelines at the forefront.
    Jiménez Paneque R; Bachelet VC
    Medwave; 2015 Sep; 15(8):e6273. PubMed ID: 26460908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventions.
    Hannink G; Gooszen HG; Rovers MM
    Ann Surg; 2013 May; 257(5):818-23. PubMed ID: 23407296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decline of dermatological publications in the UK: truth or myth?
    Martin-Clavijo A; Roberts CM; Ilchyshyn A
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2010 Dec; 35(8):910-3. PubMed ID: 20456403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The growth of clinical trials and systematic reviews in informing dermatological patient care.
    Williams HC; Dellavalle RP
    J Invest Dermatol; 2012 Mar; 132(3 Pt 2):1008-17. PubMed ID: 22048732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical reporting in randomized controlled trials from the dermatology literature: a review of 44 dermatology journals.
    McClean M; Silverberg JI
    Br J Dermatol; 2015 Jul; 173(1):172-83. PubMed ID: 25989239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Letters dermatological Cordoba].
    TELLO EE
    Rev Fac Cienc Med Cordoba; 1955; 13(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 13255238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
    J Dent; 2010 Sep; 38(9):713-21. PubMed ID: 20546823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective registration of clinical trials published in the British Journal of Dermatology.
    Batchelor J; Spuls PI
    Br J Dermatol; 2014 Oct; 171(4):681-3. PubMed ID: 25319417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reporting of primary outcome measures and sample size calculations in randomized controlled trials in dermatology journals.
    Bridgman AC; McPhie ML; Voineskos SH; Chan AW; Drucker AM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2022 Oct; 87(4):912-914. PubMed ID: 34933040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.
    Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L
    Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cluster randomised trials in the medical literature: two bibliometric surveys.
    Bland JM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Aug; 4():21. PubMed ID: 15310402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A high-yield strategy to identify randomized controlled trials for systematic reviews.
    Jadad AR; McQuay HJ
    Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Feb; Doc No 33():[3973 words; 39 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8306000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement.
    Kane RL; Wang J; Garrard J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 60(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 17292017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From star signs to trial guidelines.
    Horton R
    Lancet; 2000 Mar; 355(9209):1033-4. PubMed ID: 10744086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Assessment of the Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trial Reports Published in Prosthodontic and Implant Dentistry Journals.
    Papageorgiou SN; Kloukos D; Petridis H; Pandis N
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(6):586-93. PubMed ID: 26523717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New author guidelines - clinical trials and conflict of interest.
    Foster A
    Vet Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 19(2):51. PubMed ID: 18336420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement.
    Otwombe KN; Ogutu B
    East Afr Med J; 2002 Jul; 79(7):394-6. PubMed ID: 12638837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.