114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2685248)
1. The hinge axis: evaluation of current arbitrary determination methods and a proposal for a new recording method.
Abdal-Hadi L
J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Oct; 62(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 2685248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discrepancies between arbitrary and true hinge axes.
Walker PM
J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Mar; 43(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 6928196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Arbitrary mandibular hinge axis locations.
Simpson JW; Hesby RA; Pfeifer DL; Pelleu GB
J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Jun; 51(6):819-22. PubMed ID: 6588203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The pneumatic sponge-hinge axis locator.
Welsch BB
Fla Dent J; 1983; 54(3):35. PubMed ID: 6585314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimated and true hinge axis: a comparison of condylar displacements.
Wood DP; Korne PH
Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(3):167-75; discussion 176. PubMed ID: 1416235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative tests of arbitrary and kinematic transverse horizontal axis recordings of mandibular movements.
Bernhardt O; Küppers N; Rosin M; Meyer G
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 12616238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Location of the hinge axis and the kinematic centre in asymptomatic and clicking temporomandibular joints.
Catić A; Naeije M
J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Aug; 26(8):661-5. PubMed ID: 10447820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Technique to record the location of the kinematic hinge axis without tattooing.
Gordon SR
J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Jan; 53(1):142. PubMed ID: 3856017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of methods used in locating the mandibular hinge axis.
Razek A
J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Oct; 46(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 6946210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of arbitrary and mean transfer of dental casts to the articulator on centric occlusal errors.
Morneburg TR; Pröschel PA
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Jun; 15(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 20336474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Located hinge-axis or conventional hinge-axis?].
Pastant A; Brender P; Spirgi M; Ferrazzini G
SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1979 Oct; 89(10):1042-58. PubMed ID: 293894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Methods for minimizing the errors in mandibular model mounting on an articulator.
Adrien P; Schouver J
J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Dec; 24(12):929-35. PubMed ID: 9467996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A reassessment of the mandibular transverse horizontal axis therory.
Preston JD
J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Jun; 41(6):605-13. PubMed ID: 374717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pantographic evaluation of cephalometric hinge axis.
Brewka RE
Am J Orthod; 1981 Jan; 79(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 6935969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicted incidence of occlusal errors in centric closing around arbitrary axes.
Morneburg TR; Pröschel PA
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):358-64. PubMed ID: 12170850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of facebow and dentofacial analyzer mountings.
Galanis A; Ali M; Belles D; Koeppen RG
Tex Dent J; 2013 Oct; 130(10):1047-53. PubMed ID: 24354168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of an earpiece face-bow.
Palik JF; Nelson DR; White JT
J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Jun; 53(6):800-4. PubMed ID: 3859649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The kinematic center of condyle during lateral movement of the mandible. Existence of points of convergence in the areas of motion of the intercondylar axis].
Hobo S
Shikwa Gakuho; 1982 Nov; 82(11):1509-45. PubMed ID: 6962544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer simulation of occlusal discrepancies resulting from different mounting techniques.
Piehslinger E; Bauer W; Schmiedmayer HB
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Sep; 74(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 7473282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Movement between centric relation contact position and the intercuspal position.
Wise MD
Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(4):333-44. PubMed ID: 1520455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
