These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26852868)

  • 41. [Pay for performance (P4P). Long-term effects and perspectives].
    Schrappe M; Gültekin N
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2011 Feb; 54(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 21290270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Pay for performance in dental care: A systematic narrative review of quality P4P models in dental care].
    Chenot R
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2017 Nov; 127-128():42-55. PubMed ID: 28838794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of pay-for-performance (P4P) programs in primary care of selected countries: a comparative study.
    Jamili S; Yousefi M; Pour HE; Houshmand E; Taghipour A; Tabatabaee SS; Adel A
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2023 Aug; 23(1):865. PubMed ID: 37580717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effects of pay-for-performance on tuberculosis treatment in Taiwan.
    Li YH; Tsai WC; Khan M; Yang WT; Lee TF; Wu YC; Kung PT
    Health Policy Plan; 2010 Jul; 25(4):334-41. PubMed ID: 20207703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Implementing hospital pay-for-performance: Lessons learned from the French pilot program.
    Girault A; Bellanger M; Lalloué B; Loirat P; Moisdon JC; Minvielle E
    Health Policy; 2017 Apr; 121(4):407-417. PubMed ID: 28189271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Pay for performance in the inpatient sector: A review of 34 P4P programs in 14 OECD countries.
    Milstein R; Schreyoegg J
    Health Policy; 2016 Oct; 120(10):1125-1140. PubMed ID: 27745916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Experiences of general practices with a participatory pay-for-performance program: a qualitative study in primary care.
    Kirschner K; Braspenning J; Jacobs JE; Grol R
    Aust J Prim Health; 2013; 19(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 22954169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Physicians respond to pay-for-performance incentives: larger incentives yield greater participation.
    de Brantes FS; D'Andrea BG
    Am J Manag Care; 2009 May; 15(5):305-10. PubMed ID: 19435398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Pay for performance: survey of diagnostic radiology faculty and trainees.
    Seidel RL; Baumgarten DA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):411-5. PubMed ID: 17544143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Pay-for-performance programs - do they improve the quality of primary care?
    Wright M
    Aust Fam Physician; 2012 Dec; 41(12):989-91. PubMed ID: 23210127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Using financial incentives to improve the care of tuberculosis patients.
    Lee CY; Chi MJ; Yang SL; Lo HY; Cheng SH
    Am J Manag Care; 2015 Jan; 21(1):e35-42. PubMed ID: 25880266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effect on hospital incentive payments and quality performance of a hospital pay for performance (P4P) programme in Belgium.
    Brouwers J; Seys D; Claessens F; Van Wilder A; Bruyneel L; De Ridder D; Eeckloo K; Vanhaecht K
    J Healthc Qual Res; 2024; 39(3):147-154. PubMed ID: 38594161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Factors related to continuing care and interruption of P4P program participation in patients with diabetes.
    Yen SM; Kung PT; Sheen YJ; Chiu LT; Xu XC; Tsai WC
    Am J Manag Care; 2016 Jan; 22(1):e18-30. PubMed ID: 26799201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Assessment of a pay-for-performance program in primary care designed by target users.
    Kirschner K; Braspenning J; Akkermans RP; Jacobs JE; Grol R
    Fam Pract; 2013 Apr; 30(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 22997223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study.
    van den Heuvel H; Mand P; Heim S; Hummers-Pradier E
    Qual Prim Care; 2010; 18(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 20529469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The evidence gap on gendered impacts of performance-based financing among family physicians for chronic disease care: a systematic review reanalysis in contexts of single-payer universal coverage.
    Gupta N; Ayles HM
    Hum Resour Health; 2020 Sep; 18(1):69. PubMed ID: 32962707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. "Pay-for-performance" as a quality improvement tool: perceptions and policy recommendations of physicians and program leaders.
    Wharam JF; Frank MB; Rosland AM; Paasche-Orlow MK; Farber NJ; Sinsky C; Rucker L; Rask KJ; Barry MJ; Figaro MK
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2011; 20(3):234-45. PubMed ID: 21725221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An examination of pay-for-performance in general practice in Australia.
    Greene J
    Health Serv Res; 2013 Aug; 48(4):1415-32. PubMed ID: 23350933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Primary care providers' preferences for pay-for-performance programs: a discrete choice experiment study in Shandong China.
    Zhang W; Li Y; Yuan B; Zhu D
    Hum Resour Health; 2024 Mar; 22(1):20. PubMed ID: 38475844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Incentive implementation in physician practices: A qualitative study of practice executive perspectives on pay for performance.
    Bokhour BG; Burgess JF; Hook JM; White B; Berlowitz D; Guldin MR; Meterko M; Young GJ
    Med Care Res Rev; 2006 Feb; 63(1 Suppl):73S-95S. PubMed ID: 16688925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.