These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26853083)

  • 1. Limited information estimation of the diffusion-based item response theory model for responses and response times.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT; Szardenings C
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 May; 69(2):122-38. PubMed ID: 26853083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimum Distance Estimation of Multidimensional Diffusion-Based Item Response Theory Models.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT; Szardenings C
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(6):941-957. PubMed ID: 32019358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robust estimation of the hierarchical model for responses and response times.
    Ranger J; Wolgast A; Kuhn JT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Feb; 72(1):83-107. PubMed ID: 30051905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Information matrix estimation procedures for cognitive diagnostic models.
    Liu Y; Xin T; Andersson B; Tian W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Feb; 72(1):18-37. PubMed ID: 29508383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Joint Maximum Likelihood Estimation for High-Dimensional Exploratory Item Factor Analysis.
    Chen Y; Li X; Zhang S
    Psychometrika; 2019 Mar; 84(1):124-146. PubMed ID: 30456747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysing model fit of psychometric process models: An overview, a new test and an application to the diffusion model.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT; Szardenings C
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):209-224. PubMed ID: 28474770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distributionally weighted least squares in structural equation modeling.
    Du H; Bentler PM
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Aug; 27(4):519-540. PubMed ID: 34166048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A mixture hierarchical model for response times and response accuracy.
    Wang C; Xu G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Nov; 68(3):456-77. PubMed ID: 25873487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of item response models for accuracy and speed of item responses with applications to adaptive testing.
    van Rijn PW; Ali US
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):317-345. PubMed ID: 28474769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
    Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models.
    Hansen M; Cai L; Monroe S; Li Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):225-252. PubMed ID: 27404336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
    Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 28872185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Score-Based Tests of Differential Item Functioning via Pairwise Maximum Likelihood Estimation.
    Wang T; Strobl C; Zeileis A; Merkle EC
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):132-155. PubMed ID: 29150815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An accumulator model for responses and response times in tests based on the proportional hazards model.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):388-407. PubMed ID: 23992122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Deep Learning Algorithm for High-Dimensional Exploratory Item Factor Analysis.
    Urban CJ; Bauer DJ
    Psychometrika; 2021 Mar; 86(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 33528784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving precision of ability estimation: Getting more from response times.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):13-38. PubMed ID: 28635139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Joint Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Diagnostic Classification Models.
    Chiu CY; Köhn HF; Zheng Y; Henson R
    Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):1069-1092. PubMed ID: 27734298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correction for Item Response Theory Latent Trait Measurement Error in Linear Mixed Effects Models.
    Wang C; Xu G; Zhang X
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):673-700. PubMed ID: 31183670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pairwise Likelihood Ratio Tests and Model Selection Criteria for Structural Equation Models with Ordinal Variables.
    Katsikatsou M; Moustaki I
    Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):1046-1068. PubMed ID: 27734296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A two-stage estimation of structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables.
    Lee SY; Poon WY; Bentler PM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 1995 Nov; 48 ( Pt 2)():339-58. PubMed ID: 8527346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.