132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26853125)
1. Assessing the impact of long term frozen storage of faecal samples on protein concentration and protease activity.
Morris LS; Marchesi JR
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Apr; 123():31-8. PubMed ID: 26853125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Integrity of the Human Faecal Microbiota following Long-Term Sample Storage.
Kia E; Wagner Mackenzie B; Middleton D; Lau A; Waite DW; Lewis G; Chan YK; Silvestre M; Cooper GJ; Poppitt SD; Taylor MW
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163666. PubMed ID: 27701448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles.
Choo JM; Leong LE; Rogers GB
Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16350. PubMed ID: 26572876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes of viability and composition of the Escherichia coli flora in faecal samples during long time storage.
Achá SJ; Kühn I; Mbazima G; Colque-Navarro P; Möllby R
J Microbiol Methods; 2005 Dec; 63(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 15979748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minor compositional alterations in faecal microbiota after five weeks and five months storage at room temperature on filter papers.
von Huth S; Thingholm LB; Bang C; Rühlemann MC; Franke A; Holmskov U
Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):19008. PubMed ID: 31831829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How should we store avian faecal samples for microbiota analyses? Comparing efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
Vargas-Pellicer P; Watrobska C; Knowles S; Schroeder J; Banks-Leite C
J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Oct; 165():105689. PubMed ID: 31425715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of freezing on faecal microbiota as determined using MiSeq sequencing and culture-based investigations.
Fouhy F; Deane J; Rea MC; O'Sullivan Ó; Ross RP; O'Callaghan G; Plant BJ; Stanton C
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119355. PubMed ID: 25748176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of preservation method on spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) fecal microbiota over 8 weeks.
Hale VL; Tan CL; Knight R; Amato KR
J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Jun; 113():16-26. PubMed ID: 25819008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Latitude in sample handling and storage for infant faecal microbiota studies: the elephant in the room?
Shaw AG; Sim K; Powell E; Cornwell E; Cramer T; McClure ZE; Li MS; Kroll JS
Microbiome; 2016 Jul; 4(1):40. PubMed ID: 27473284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sample storage conditions induce post-collection biases in microbiome profiles.
Jenkins SV; Vang KB; Gies A; Griffin RJ; Jun SR; Nookaew I; Dings RPM
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):227. PubMed ID: 30591021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Standard Sample Storage Conditions Have an Impact on Inferred Microbiome Composition and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns.
Poulsen CS; Kaas RS; Aarestrup FM; Pamp SJ
Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Oct; 9(2):e0138721. PubMed ID: 34612701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of the long-term storage of human fecal microbiota samples collected in RNAlater.
Tap J; Cools-Portier S; Pavan S; Druesne A; Öhman L; Törnblom H; Simren M; Derrien M
Sci Rep; 2019 Jan; 9(1):601. PubMed ID: 30679604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ionic liquid-based reagents improve the stability of midterm fecal sample storage.
Hao L; Xia Z; Yang H; Wang J; Han M
J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Aug; 139():68-73. PubMed ID: 28506638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An ambient temperature collection and stabilization strategy for canine microbiota studies.
Lin CY; Cross TL; Doukhanine E; Swanson KS
Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13383. PubMed ID: 32770113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The stability of progesterone in feces of different wild animal species kept in a zoological garden].
Neumann G; Gottschalk J; Eulenberger K; Grün E
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2002 May; 109(5):245-9. PubMed ID: 12073499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Urinary proteases degrade albumin: implications for measurement of albuminuria in stored samples.
Kania K; Byrnes EA; Beilby JP; Webb SA; Strong KJ
Ann Clin Biochem; 2010 Mar; 47(Pt 2):151-7. PubMed ID: 20150213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating Protocols for Porcine Faecal Microbiome Recollection, Storage and DNA Extraction: from the Farm to the Lab.
Muiños-Bühl A; González-Recio O; Muñoz M; Óvilo C; García-Casco J; Fernández AI
Curr Microbiol; 2018 Jun; 75(6):651-657. PubMed ID: 29318340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of preservation media and freezing conditions for storage of specimens of faeces.
Dan M; Richardson J; Miliotis MD; Koornhof HJ
J Med Microbiol; 1989 Feb; 28(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 2915366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of temperature and time storage on the microbial detection of oral samples by Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization method.
do Nascimento C; dos Santos JN; Pedrazzi V; Pita MS; Monesi N; Ribeiro RF; de Albuquerque RF
Arch Oral Biol; 2014 Jan; 59(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 24246268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The UK Biobank sample handling and storage validation studies.
Peakman TC; Elliott P
Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 37 Suppl 1():i2-6. PubMed ID: 18381389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
