These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26853829)
1. Three-dimensional imaging: a novel, valid, and reliable technique for measuring wound surface area. Rashaan ZM; Stekelenburg CM; van der Wal MB; Euser AM; Hagendoorn BJ; van Zuijlen PP; Breederveld RS Skin Res Technol; 2016 Nov; 22(4):443-450. PubMed ID: 26853829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D photography is a reliable burn wound area assessment tool compared to digital planimetry in very young children. Gee Kee EL; Kimble RM; Stockton KA Burns; 2015 Sep; 41(6):1286-90. PubMed ID: 25716762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional digital stereophotogrammetry: a reliable and valid technique for measuring scar surface area. Stekelenburg CM; van der Wal MBA; Knol DL; de Vet HCW; van Zuijlen PPM Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Jul; 132(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 23806921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The FLIR ONE thermal imager for the assessment of burn wounds: Reliability and validity study. Jaspers MEH; Carrière ME; Meij-de Vries A; Klaessens JHGM; van Zuijlen PPM Burns; 2017 Nov; 43(7):1516-1523. PubMed ID: 28536040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional imaging is a novel and reliable technique to measure total body surface area. Rashaan ZM; Euser AM; van Zuijlen PPM; Breederveld RS Burns; 2018 Jun; 44(4):816-822. PubMed ID: 29395393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D photography is as accurate as digital planimetry tracing in determining burn wound area. Stockton KA; McMillan CM; Storey KJ; David MC; Kimble RM Burns; 2015 Feb; 41(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 24877886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Insights into the use of thermography to assess burn wound healing potential: a reliable and valid technique when compared to laser Doppler imaging. Jaspers ME; Maltha I; Klaessens JH; de Vet HC; Verdaasdonk RM; van Zuijlen PP J Biomed Opt; 2016 Sep; 21(9):96006. PubMed ID: 27623232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A system for 3D representation of burns and calculation of burnt skin area. Prieto MF; Acha B; Gómez-Cía T; Fondón I; Serrano C Burns; 2011 Nov; 37(7):1233-40. PubMed ID: 21703768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional imaging for volume measurement of hypertrophic and keloid scars, reliability of a previously validated simplified technique in clinical setting. Verhiel SH; Piatkowski de Grzymala AA; Van den Kerckhove E; Colla C; van der Hulst RR Skin Res Technol; 2016 Nov; 22(4):513-518. PubMed ID: 27283970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New analysis methods for skin fine-structure via optical image and development of 3D skin Cycloscan(™). Han JY; Nam GW; Lee HK; Kim MJ; Kim EJ Skin Res Technol; 2015 Nov; 21(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 25641585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. FluxEXPLORER: a new high-speed laser Doppler imaging system for the assessment of burn injuries. Erba P; Espinoza D; Koch N; Christen T; Serov A; Raffoul W Skin Res Technol; 2012 Nov; 18(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 22332947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity and reliability of a novel 3D scanner for assessment of the shape and volume of amputees' residual limb models. Seminati E; Canepa Talamas D; Young M; Twiste M; Dhokia V; Bilzon JLJ PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184498. PubMed ID: 28886154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In a clinimetric analysis, 3D stereophotogrammetry was found to be reliable and valid for measuring scar volume in clinical research. Stekelenburg CM; Jaspers ME; Niessen FB; Knol DL; van der Wal MB; de Vet HC; van Zuijlen PP J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):782-7. PubMed ID: 25817943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical effect of three dimensional human body scanning system BurnCalc in the evaluation of burn wound area]. Lu J; Wang L; Zhang YC; Tang HT; Xia ZF Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 33(10):597-601. PubMed ID: 29056020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A clinimetric assessment of the validity and reliability of 3D technology for scar surface area measurement. Doomen MCHA; Rijpma D; Pijpe A; Meij-de Vries A; Niessen FB; Karaoglu S; de Vet HCW; Gevers T; van Zuijlen PPM Burns; 2023 May; 49(3):583-594. PubMed ID: 36764836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and validity of measurements of facial swelling with a stereophotogrammetry optical three-dimensional scanner. van der Meer WJ; Dijkstra PU; Visser A; Vissink A; Ren Y Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 52(10):922-7. PubMed ID: 25219776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of two handheld devices against a non-portable three-dimensional surface scanner and assessment of potential use for intraoperative facial imaging. Koban KC; Perko P; Etzel L; Li Z; Schenck TL; Giunta RE J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Jan; 73(1):141-148. PubMed ID: 31519501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The reproducibility and clinical utility of the 3D camera for measuring scar height, with a protocol for administration. Tyack Z; Simons M; Kimble RM; Muller MJ; Leung K Skin Res Technol; 2017 Nov; 23(4):463-470. PubMed ID: 28271550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]