100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26853972)
1. A pilot study of patient-specific cardiovascular MDCT dose maps and their utility in estimating patient-specific organ and effective doses in obese patients.
Thompson CM; Yanof JH; Wiegert J; Bullen J; Obuchowski N; Yaddanapudi K; Halliburton SS
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):265-8. PubMed ID: 26853972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Radiation Exposure Associated With Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Follow-up Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography for Evaluating Endovascular Aneurysm Repairs.
Steuwe A; Geisbüsch P; Schulz CJ; Böckler D; Kauczor HU; Stiller W
J Endovasc Ther; 2016 Aug; 23(4):583-92. PubMed ID: 27193306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose.
DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; Zankl M; Angel E; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(9):2583-97. PubMed ID: 17440254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation exposure related to cardiovascular CT examination: comparison between conventional 64-MDCT and third-generation dual-source MDCT.
Agliata G; Schicchi N; Agostini A; Fogante M; Mari A; Maggi S; Giovagnoni A
Radiol Med; 2019 Aug; 124(8):753-761. PubMed ID: 31011995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of protocol and obesity on dose conversion factors in adult body CT.
Li X; Samei E; Williams CH; Segars WP; Tward DJ; Miller MI; Ratnanather JT; Paulson EK; Frush DP
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6550-71. PubMed ID: 23127050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning.
Christner JA; Kofler JM; McCollough CH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 20308486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ECG-triggered high-pitch CT for simultaneous assessment of the aorta and coronary arteries.
Hachulla AL; Ronot M; Noble S; Becker CD; Montet X; Vallée JP
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(5):407-13. PubMed ID: 27451049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective national survey of coronary CT angiography radiation doses in the United Kingdom.
Castellano IA; Nicol ED; Bull RK; Roobottom CA; Williams MC; Harden SP
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(4):268-273. PubMed ID: 28532693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation exposure to patients in a multicenter coronary angiography trial (CORE 64).
Geleijns J; Joemai RM; Dewey M; de Roos A; Zankl M; Cantera AC; Artells MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):1126-32. PubMed ID: 21512080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the use of Monte Carlo-derived dosimetric data in the estimation of patient dose from CT examinations.
Perisinakis K; Tzedakis A; Damilakis J
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2018-28. PubMed ID: 18561678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation dose estimation for prospective and retrospective ECG-gated cardiac CT angiography in infants and small children using a 320-MDCT volume scanner.
Podberesky DJ; Angel E; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Salisbury SR; Alsip C; Barelli A; Egelhoff JC; Anderson-Evans C; Nguyen GB; Dow D; Frush DP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov; 199(5):1129-35. PubMed ID: 23096189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation and comparison of the radiation effective dose during coronary computed tomography angiography examinations on single-source 64-MDCT and dual-source 128-MDCT.
Khoramian D; Sistani S
J Radiol Prot; 2017 Dec; 37(4):826-836. PubMed ID: 28910264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner.
Einstein AJ; Elliston CD; Arai AE; Chen MY; Mather R; Pearson GD; Delapaz RL; Nickoloff E; Dutta A; Brenner DJ
Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):698-706. PubMed ID: 20177085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effective dose determination using an anthropomorphic phantom and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for clinical adult body multidetector array computed tomography protocols.
Hurwitz LM; Yoshizumi TT; Goodman PC; Frush DP; Nguyen G; Toncheva G; Lowry C
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(4):544-9. PubMed ID: 17882029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Organ and effective dose evaluation in coronary angiography by using a 320 MDCT based on in-phantom dose measurements with TLDs.
Lu H; Zhuo W; Xu B; Wang M
J Radiol Prot; 2015 Sep; 35(3):597-609. PubMed ID: 26180015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How to Appropriately Calculate Effective Dose for CT Using Either Size-Specific Dose Estimates or Dose-Length Product.
Brady SL; Mirro AE; Moore BM; Kaufman RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):953-8. PubMed ID: 25729893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A database for estimating organ dose for coronary angiography and brain perfusion CT scans for arbitrary spectra and angular tube current modulation.
Rupcich F; Badal A; Kyprianou I; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5336-46. PubMed ID: 22957601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Entrance skin dosimetry and size-specific dose estimate from pediatric chest CTA.
Westra SJ; Li X; Gulati K; Singh S; Liu B; Kalra MK; Abbara S
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 24211194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of patient dose in rest and stress cardiac computed tomography with a 320-detector row CT scanner.
Geleijns J; Joemai RMS; Cros M; Hernandez-Giron I; Calzado A; Dewey M; Salvado M
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1029-1034. PubMed ID: 26439859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perfusion CT of the Brain and Liver and of Lung Tumors: Use of Monte Carlo Simulation for Patient Dose Estimation for Examinations With a Cone-Beam 320-MDCT Scanner.
Cros M; Geleijns J; Joemai RM; Salvadó M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jan; 206(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 26700344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
