These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26854082)

  • 1. Evaluating the Use of Plain Language in a Cancer Clinical Trial Website/App.
    Schultz PL; Carlisle R; Cheatham C; O'Grady M
    J Cancer Educ; 2017 Dec; 32(4):707-713. PubMed ID: 26854082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Plain Language to Communicate Physical Activity Information: A Website Content Analysis.
    Paige SR; Black DR; Mattson M; Coster DC; Stellefson M
    Health Promot Pract; 2019 May; 20(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 29621886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Plain Language Summaries of Clinical Trial Results: A Preliminary Study to Assess Availability of Easy-to-Understand Summaries and Approaches to Improving Public Engagement.
    Penlington M; Silverman H; Vasudevan A; Pavithran P
    Pharmaceut Med; 2020 Dec; 34(6):401-406. PubMed ID: 33113147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristics of clinical trial websites: information distribution between ClinicalTrials.gov and 13 primary registries in the WHO registry network.
    Ogino D; Takahashi K; Sato H
    Trials; 2014 Nov; 15():428. PubMed ID: 25373358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of a Plain Language Decision Support Tool for Cancer Clinical Trials: Blending Health Literacy, Academic Research, and Minority Patient Perspectives.
    Langford AT; Hawley ST; Stableford S; Studts JL; Byrne MM
    J Cancer Educ; 2020 Jun; 35(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 30739270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linguistic Strategies for Improving Informed Consent in Clinical Trials Among Low Health Literacy Patients.
    Krieger JL; Neil JM; Strekalova YA; Sarge MA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 Mar; 109(3):. PubMed ID: 27794035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of online information about phase I clinical cancer trials in Sweden, Denmark and Norway.
    Godskesen TE; Fernow J; Eriksson S
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2018 Nov; 27(6):e12937. PubMed ID: 30277632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Communicating cancer treatment information using the Web: utilizing the patient's perspective in website development.
    Hopmans W; Damman OC; Timmermans DR; Haasbeek CJ; Slotman BJ; Senan S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2014 Dec; 14():116. PubMed ID: 25481306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simplification improves understanding of informed consent information in clinical trials regardless of health literacy level.
    Kim EJ; Kim SH
    Clin Trials; 2015 Jun; 12(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 25701156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient Perception of Plain-Language Medical Notes Generated Using Artificial Intelligence Software: Pilot Mixed-Methods Study.
    Bala S; Keniston A; Burden M
    JMIR Form Res; 2020 Jun; 4(6):e16670. PubMed ID: 32442148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reducing drug self-injection errors: a randomized trial comparing a "standard" versus "plain language" version of Patient Instructions for Use.
    Smith MY; Wallace LS
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2013; 9(5):621-5. PubMed ID: 23506652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring websites on cancer clinical trials: an empirical review.
    Simon C; Hegedus S
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Oct; 26(5):530-3. PubMed ID: 16122989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adding value to clinical trial registries: insights from Australian Cancer Trials Online, a website for consumers.
    Dear R; Barratt A; Askie L; McGeechan K; Arora S; Crossing S; Currow D; Tattersall M
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 21335591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Russian translations for Cochrane.
    Yudina EV; Ziganshina LE
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S112-3. PubMed ID: 26639688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Readability of online health information: implications for health literacy.
    McInnes N; Haglund BJ
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2011 Dec; 36(4):173-89. PubMed ID: 21332302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physicians' use of plain language during discussions of prostate cancer clinical trials with patients.
    Thominet L; Hamel LM; Baidoun F; Moore TF; Barton E; Heath EI; Carducci M; Lansey D; Eggly S
    Patient Educ Couns; 2022 Dec; 105(12):3453-3458. PubMed ID: 36085183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the readability of ClinicalTrials.gov.
    Wu DT; Hanauer DA; Mei Q; Clark PM; An LC; Proulx J; Zeng QT; Vydiswaran VG; Collins-Thompson K; Zheng K
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Mar; 23(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 26269536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving knowledge and trust in vaccines: A survey-based assessment of the potential of the European Union Clinical Trial Regulation No 536/2014 plain language summary to increase health literacy.
    Penlington M; Goulet P; Metcalfe B
    Vaccine; 2022 Feb; 40(6):924-933. PubMed ID: 34996640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A survey of patient comprehension of readily accessible online educational material regarding plastic surgery procedures.
    Hoppe IC; Ahuja NK; Ingargiola MJ; Granick MS
    Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Mar; 33(3):436-42. PubMed ID: 23515387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Online Patient Resources for Liposuction: A Comparative Analysis of Readability.
    Vargas CR; Ricci JA; Chuang DJ; Lee BT
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Mar; 76(3):349-54. PubMed ID: 25695442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.