These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26854292)

  • 1. HMM-Fisher: identifying differential methylation using a hidden Markov model and Fisher's exact test.
    Sun S; Yu X
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2016 Mar; 15(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 26854292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. HMM-DM: identifying differentially methylated regions using a hidden Markov model.
    Yu X; Sun S
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2016 Mar; 15(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 26887041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of differentially methylated regions from bisulfite-seq data by hidden Markov models incorporating genome-wide methylation level distributions.
    Saito Y; Mituyama T
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S3. PubMed ID: 26681544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A hidden markov model for identifying differentially methylated sites in bisulfite sequencing data.
    Shokoohi F; Stephens DA; Bourque G; Pastinen T; Greenwood CMT; Labbe A
    Biometrics; 2019 Mar; 75(1):210-221. PubMed ID: 30168593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian hidden Markov model for detecting differentially methylated regions.
    Ji T
    Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):663-673. PubMed ID: 30443900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. BIMMER: a novel algorithm for detecting differential DNA methylation regions from MBDCap-seq data.
    Mao Z; Ma C; Huang TH; Chen Y; Huang Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014; 15 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S6. PubMed ID: 25474268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing five statistical methods of differential methylation identification using bisulfite sequencing data.
    Yu X; Sun S
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2016 Apr; 15(2):173-91. PubMed ID: 26910753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detect differentially methylated regions using non-homogeneous hidden Markov model for bisulfite sequencing data.
    Chen Y; Kwok CK; Jiang H; Fan X
    Methods; 2021 May; 189():34-43. PubMed ID: 32949692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatially Enhanced Differential RNA Methylation Analysis from Affinity-Based Sequencing Data with Hidden Markov Model.
    Zhang YC; Zhang SW; Liu L; Liu H; Zhang L; Cui X; Huang Y; Meng J
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():852070. PubMed ID: 26301253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MeDIP-HMM: genome-wide identification of distinct DNA methylation states from high-density tiling arrays.
    Seifert M; Cortijo S; Colomé-Tatché M; Johannes F; Roudier F; Colot V
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Nov; 28(22):2930-9. PubMed ID: 22989518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methylation-level inferences and detection of differential methylation with MeDIP-seq data.
    Zhou Y; Zhu J; Zhao M; Zhang B; Jiang C; Yang X
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201586. PubMed ID: 30086146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. LuxHMM: DNA methylation analysis with genome segmentation via hidden Markov model.
    Malonzo MH; Lähdesmäki H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Feb; 24(1):58. PubMed ID: 36810075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of DNA methylation in the promoter of gene suppressor tumor.
    Saif I; Kasmi Y; Allali K; Ennaji MM
    Gene; 2018 Apr; 651():166-173. PubMed ID: 29408272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of functionally methylated regions based on discriminant analysis through integrating methylation and gene expression data.
    Zhang Y; Zhang J
    Mol Biosyst; 2015 Jul; 11(7):1786-93. PubMed ID: 25865601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq to investigate genome-wide CpG methylation.
    Li D; Zhang B; Xing X; Wang T
    Methods; 2015 Jan; 72():29-40. PubMed ID: 25448294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. HEPeak: an HMM-based exome peak-finding package for RNA epigenome sequencing data.
    Cui X; Meng J; Rao MK; Chen Y; Huang Y
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S2. PubMed ID: 25917296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reduced representation bisulphite sequencing of ten bovine somatic tissues reveals DNA methylation patterns and their impacts on gene expression.
    Zhou Y; Xu L; Bickhart DM; Abdel Hay EH; Schroeder SG; Connor EE; Alexander LJ; Sonstegard TS; Van Tassell CP; Chen H; Liu GE
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):779. PubMed ID: 27716143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PCR Techniques in Characterizing DNA Methylation.
    Wani K; Aldape KD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1392():177-86. PubMed ID: 26843056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MIRA-seq for DNA methylation analysis of CpG islands.
    Jung M; Kadam S; Xiong W; Rauch TA; Jin SG; Pfeifer GP
    Epigenomics; 2015 Aug; 7(5):695-706. PubMed ID: 25881900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Thorough statistical analyses of breast cancer co-methylation patterns.
    Sun S; Dammann J; Lai P; Tian C
    BMC Genom Data; 2022 Apr; 23(1):29. PubMed ID: 35428183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.