203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26855092)
1. Successful Oocyte Cryopreservation in Reproductive-Aged Cancer Survivors.
Druckenmiller S; Goldman KN; Labella PA; Fino ME; Bazzocchi A; Noyes N
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 127(3):474-480. PubMed ID: 26855092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients.
Goldman RH; Racowsky C; Farland LV; Munné S; Ribustello L; Fox JH
Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):853-859. PubMed ID: 28166330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The number of oocytes associated with maximum cumulative live birth rates per aspiration depends on female age: a population study of 221 221 treatment cycles.
Law YJ; Zhang N; Venetis CA; Chambers GM; Harris K
Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1778-1787. PubMed ID: 31398253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval.
Doyle JO; Richter KS; Lim J; Stillman RJ; Graham JR; Tucker MJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):459-66.e2. PubMed ID: 26604065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fertility preservation in female oncology patients: the influence of the type of cancer on ovarian stimulation response.
Alvarez RM; Ramanathan P
Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):2051-2059. PubMed ID: 27370358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of live birth rates and perinatal outcomes between cryopreserved oocytes and cryopreserved embryos.
Ho JR; Woo I; Louie K; Salem W; Jabara SI; Bendikson KA; Paulson RJ; Chung K
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Oct; 34(10):1359-1366. PubMed ID: 28718080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of cancer stage and grade on fertility preservation outcome and ovarian stimulation response.
Volodarsky-Perel A; Cohen Y; Arab S; Son WY; Suarthana E; Dahan MH; Tulandi T; Buckett W
Hum Reprod; 2019 Mar; 34(3):530-538. PubMed ID: 30689898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis.
Oktay K; Cil AP; Bang H
Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 16818031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fertility preservation after gonadotoxic treatments for cancer and autoimmune diseases.
Saito S; Yamada M; Yano R; Takahashi K; Ebara A; Sakanaka H; Matsumoto M; Ishimaru T; Utsuno H; Matsuzawa Y; Ooka R; Fukuoka M; Akashi K; Kamijo S; Hamatani T; Tanaka M
J Ovarian Res; 2023 Aug; 16(1):159. PubMed ID: 37563616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oocyte efficiency: does live birth rate differ when analyzing cryopreserved and fresh oocytes on a per-oocyte basis?
Goldman KN; Noyes NL; Knopman JM; McCaffrey C; Grifo JA
Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):712-7. PubMed ID: 23721713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Random Start Ovarian Stimulation for Oocyte or Embryo Cryopreservation in Women Desiring Fertility Preservation Prior to Gonadotoxic Cancer Therapy.
Danis RB; Pereira N; Elias RT
Curr Pharm Biotechnol; 2017 Nov; 18(8):609-613. PubMed ID: 28786354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproductive potential of a metaphase II oocyte retrieved after ovarian stimulation: an analysis of 23 354 ICSI cycles.
Stoop D; Ermini B; Polyzos NP; Haentjens P; De Vos M; Verheyen G; Devroey P
Hum Reprod; 2012 Jul; 27(7):2030-5. PubMed ID: 22552690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Elective and Onco-fertility preservation: factors related to IVF outcomes.
Cobo A; García-Velasco J; Domingo J; Pellicer A; Remohí J
Hum Reprod; 2018 Dec; 33(12):2222-2231. PubMed ID: 30383235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immature oocyte retrieval and in vitro oocyte maturation at different phases of the menstrual cycle in women with cancer who require urgent gonadotoxic treatment.
Creux H; Monnier P; Son WY; Tulandi T; Buckett W
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 27810160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oocyte vitrification as an efficient option for elective fertility preservation.
Cobo A; García-Velasco JA; Coello A; Domingo J; Pellicer A; Remohí J
Fertil Steril; 2016 Mar; 105(3):755-764.e8. PubMed ID: 26688429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oocyte cryopreservation review: outcomes of medical oocyte cryopreservation and planned oocyte cryopreservation.
Walker Z; Lanes A; Ginsburg E
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2022 Jan; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 34996479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Delivery rate using cryopreserved oocytes is comparable to conventional in vitro fertilization using fresh oocytes: potential fertility preservation for female cancer patients.
Grifo JA; Noyes N
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):391-6. PubMed ID: 19439285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of two different oocyte vitrification methods: a prospective, paired study on the same genetic background and stimulation protocol.
Pujol A; Zamora MJ; Obradors A; Garcia D; Rodriguez A; Vassena R
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 34(6):989-997. PubMed ID: 31116386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
