171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26855386)
1. In-situ determination of field-scale NAPL mass transfer coefficients: Performance, simulation and analysis.
Mobile M; Widdowson M; Stewart L; Nyman J; Deeb R; Kavanaugh M; Mercer J; Gallagher D
J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Apr; 187():31-46. PubMed ID: 26855386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multicomponent NAPL source dissolution: evaluation of mass-transfer coefficients.
Mobile MA; Widdowson MA; Gallagher DL
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(18):10047-54. PubMed ID: 22873644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Significance of groundwater flux on contaminant concentration and mass discharge in the nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) contaminated zone.
Zhu J; Sun D
J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Sep; 192():158-164. PubMed ID: 27500747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of source zone heterogeneity on surfactant-enhanced NAPL dissolution and resulting remediation end-points.
Saenton S; Illangasekare TH; Soga K; Saba TA
J Contam Hydrol; 2002 Nov; 59(1-2):27-44. PubMed ID: 12683638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sherwood correlation for dissolution of pooled NAPL in porous media.
Aydin Sarikurt D; Gokdemir C; Copty NK
J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Nov; 206():67-74. PubMed ID: 29033219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In situ stabilization of NAPL contaminant source-zones as a remediation technique to reduce mass discharge and flux to groundwater.
Mateas DJ; Tick GR; Carroll KC
J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Sep; 204():40-56. PubMed ID: 28780996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of NAPL source zone remediation efficiency and the mass flux approach.
Soga K; Page JW; Illangasekare TH
J Hazard Mater; 2004 Jul; 110(1-3):13-27. PubMed ID: 15177723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modeling the impact of a benzene source zone on the transport behavior of PAHs in groundwater.
Russold S; Schirmer M; Piepenbrink M; Schirmer K
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Jun; 40(11):3565-71. PubMed ID: 16786695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oscillatory hydraulic testing as a strategy for NAPL source zone monitoring: Laboratory experiments.
Zhou Y; Cardiff M
J Contam Hydrol; 2017 May; 200():24-34. PubMed ID: 28366611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigation of surfactant-enhanced dissolution of entrapped nonaqueous phase liquid chemicals in a two-dimensional groundwater flow field.
Saba T; Illangasekare TH; Ewing J
J Contam Hydrol; 2001 Sep; 51(1-2):63-82. PubMed ID: 11530927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) source zone architecture on mass removal mechanisms in strongly layered heterogeneous porous media during soil vapor extraction.
Yoon H; Werth CJ; Valocchi AJ; Oostrom M
J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Aug; 100(1-2):58-71. PubMed ID: 18619707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surfactant flooding makes a comeback: Results of a full-scale, field implementation to recover mobilized NAPL.
Sharma P; Kostarelos K; Lenschow S; Christensen A; de Blanc PC
J Contam Hydrol; 2020 Mar; 230():103602. PubMed ID: 32005455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A method of estimating multicomponent nonaqueous-phase liquid mass in porous media using aqueous concentration ratios.
Devlint JF; Barbaro JR
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2001 Nov; 20(11):2443-9. PubMed ID: 11699767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Numerical modelling of the impact of surfactant partitioning on surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation.
Babaei M; Copty NK
J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Feb; 221():69-81. PubMed ID: 30691860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of multicomponent diffusion on NAPL dissolution from spherical ternary mixtures.
Brahma PP; Harmon TC
J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Dec; 67(1-4):43-60. PubMed ID: 14607469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of theory and experiment for NAPL dissolution in porous media.
Bahar T; Golfier F; Oltéan C; Lefevre E; Lorgeoux C
J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Apr; 211():49-64. PubMed ID: 29573829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scenario-based modelling of mass transfer mechanisms at a petroleum contaminated field site-numerical implications.
Vasudevan M; Nambi IM; Suresh Kumar G
J Environ Manage; 2016 Jun; 175():9-19. PubMed ID: 27017268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of NAPL-water interfacial areas and mass transfer rates in two-dimensional flow cell.
Li M; Zhai Y; Wan L
Water Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 74(9):2145-2151. PubMed ID: 27842034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of NAPL Source Morphology on Mass Transfer in the Vadose Zone.
Petri BG; Fučík R; Illangasekare TH; Smits KM; Christ JA; Sakaki T; Sauck CC
Ground Water; 2015; 53(5):685-98. PubMed ID: 25535651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhanced removal of NAPL constituent from aquifer during surfactant flushing with aqueous hydraulic barriers of high viscosity.
Ahn D; Choi JK; Kim H
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2017 Jun; 52(7):590-597. PubMed ID: 28281884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
