These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26856010)
21. Transmigration of mandibular canines: a rare case report and review of literature. Gunashekhar M; Rohini M J Dent Child (Chic); 2011; 78(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 22041004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Concrescence of a mandibular third molar and a supernumerary fourth molar: report of a rare case. Gunduz K; Sumer M; Sumer AP; Gunhan O Br Dent J; 2006 Feb; 200(3):141-2. PubMed ID: 16474352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Morphology of third molar teeth with incompletely formed apices on the basis of panoramic radiograms. Rózyło-Kalinowska I; Burdan F; Marchut T Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2003 May; 62(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 12866670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Panoramic radiographs aid in studying third-molar eruption. Mailankody J Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jul; 130(1):4; author reply 4. PubMed ID: 16849059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography. Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Bergé SJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 38(9):964-71. PubMed ID: 19640685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Radiographic study of the positional changes and eruption of impacted third molars in young adults of an Asian Indian population. Sandhu S; Kaur T J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Aug; 66(8):1617-24. PubMed ID: 18634949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparative evaluation of film and digital panoramic radiographs in the assessment of position and morphology of impacted mandibular third molars. Mahesh MS; Mahima VG; Patil K Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 21891889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radiographic follow-up of impacted third molars from age 20 to 32 years. Ventä I; Turtola L; Ylipaavalniemi P Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Feb; 30(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 11289622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Transmigrant mandibular canines. Buyukkurt MC; Aras MH; Caglaroglu M; Gungormus M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Oct; 65(10):2025-9. PubMed ID: 17884533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Correlation of darkening of impacted mandibular third molar root on digital panoramic images with cone beam computed tomography findings. Tantanapornkul W; Okochi K; Bhakdinaronk A; Ohbayashi N; Kurabayashi T Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jan; 38(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 19114418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Panoramic radiographic predictors of mandibular third molar eruption. Niedzielska IA; Drugacz J; Kus N; Kreska J Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):154-8; discussion 159. PubMed ID: 16876055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Panoramic radiography in evaluating the relationship of mandibular canal and impacted third molars in comparison with cone-beam computed tomography. Ishak MH; Zhun OC; Shaari R; Rahman SA; Hasan MN; Alam MK Mymensingh Med J; 2014 Oct; 23(4):781-6. PubMed ID: 25481601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Diagnostic features of the paradental cyst and report of a case. Mufeed A; Chatra L; Shenai P Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):125-6. PubMed ID: 19176657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]