These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26856962)

  • 1. Spherical subjective refraction with a novel 3D virtual reality based system.
    Pujol J; Ondategui-Parra JC; Badiella L; Otero C; Vilaseca M; Aldaba M
    J Optom; 2017; 10(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 26856962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of an automated subjective refraction method implemented in a computer-controlled motorized phoropter.
    Otero C; Aldaba M; Pujol J
    J Optom; 2019; 12(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 30389250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
    Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retinoscopy/autorefraction: which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
    Jorge J; Queirós A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15630406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM-5500.
    Sheppard AL; Davies LN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Mar; 30(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 20444118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
    Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeatability of autorefraction and axial length measurements after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Bailey MD; Twa MD; Mitchell GL; Dhaliwal DK; Jones LA; McMahon TT
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):1025-34. PubMed ID: 15975474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ametropia detection using a novel, compact wavefront autorefractor.
    Hernández CS; Gil A; Zaytouny A; Casares I; Poderoso J; de Lara A; Wehse A; Dave SR; Lim D; Lage E; Alejandre-Alba N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Mar; 44(2):311-320. PubMed ID: 38084770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study.
    Stoor K; Karvonen E; Liinamaa J; Saarela V
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29193822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults.
    Mallen EA; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B; Tsujimura S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Mar; 21(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 11261343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
    María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability and Reproducibility of Virtual Subjective Refraction.
    Perches S; Collados MV; Ares J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Oct; 93(10):1243-53. PubMed ID: 27391538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Population-based assessment of sensitivity and specificity of a pinhole for detection of significant refractive errors in the community.
    Marmamula S; Keeffe JE; Narsaiah S; Khanna RC; Rao GN
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 24909916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical Evaluation Of a 0.05 D-step Binocular Wavefront Optometer in Young Adults in China.
    Cheng M; Chen X; Lei Y; Li B; Jiang Y; Xu Y; Zhou X; Wang X
    Clin Exp Optom; 2024 May; 107(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 36794379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy and variability of autorefraction by the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer and the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001 in relation to subjective refraction.
    Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Patel PM; Lin PF; Marshall J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Mar; 29(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 19236587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of multifocal contact lens over-refraction using an infrared, open-field autorefractor: A preliminary study.
    Giner A; Aldaba M; Arjona M; Vilaseca M; Pujol J
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Oct; 38(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 25907202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of refraction--a literature review.
    Goss DA; Grosvenor T
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):619-30. PubMed ID: 8942135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the auto-refraction function of the Nidek OPD-Scan III.
    McGinnigle S; Naroo SA; Eperjesi F
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Mar; 97(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 24024877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of an automated refractor using a Hartmann-Shack sensor after corneal refractive surgery and cataract surgery.
    Park JH; Kim MJ; Park JH; Song IS; Kim JY; Tchah H
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1889-97. PubMed ID: 26603398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of six different autorefractor designs on the precision and accuracy of refractive error measurement.
    Venkataraman AP; Brautaset R; Domínguez-Vicent A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0278269. PubMed ID: 36441778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.