BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26857318)

  • 1. Effects of ear canal static pressure on the dynamic behaviour of outer and middle ear in newborns.
    Aithal V; Kei J; Driscoll C; Murakoshi M; Wada H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():64-72. PubMed ID: 26857318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Normative sweep frequency impedance measures in healthy neonates.
    Aithal V; Kei J; Driscoll C; Swanston A; Roberts K; Murakoshi M; Wada H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Apr; 25(4):343-54. PubMed ID: 25126682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sweep frequency impedance measures in Australian Aboriginal and Caucasian neonates.
    Aithal V; Kei J; Driscoll C; Swanston A; Murakoshi M; Wada H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jul; 79(7):1024-9. PubMed ID: 25930171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive Accuracy of Sweep Frequency Impedance Technology in Identifying Conductive Conditions in Newborns.
    Aithal V; Kei J; Driscoll C; Murakoshi M; Wada H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):106-117. PubMed ID: 29401058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wideband Absorbance Outcomes in Newborns: A Comparison With High-Frequency Tympanometry, Automated Brainstem Response, and Transient Evoked and Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Aithal S; Kei J; Driscoll C; Khan A; Swanston A
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):e237-50. PubMed ID: 25951046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ear canal pressure variations versus negative middle ear pressure: comparison using distortion product otoacoustic emission measurement in humans.
    Sun XM
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 21747284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Longitudinal changes in dynamic characteristics of neonatal external and middle ears.
    Kanka N; Murakoshi M; Hamanishi S; Kakuta R; Matsutani S; Kobayashi T; Wada H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Jul; 134():110061. PubMed ID: 32387706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sweep frequency impedance measures in young infants: developmental characteristics from birth to 6 months.
    Aithal V; Kei J; Driscoll C; Murakoshi M; Wada H
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):154-163. PubMed ID: 27780372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of middle ear pressure on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Trine MB; Hirsch JE; Margolis RH
    Ear Hear; 1993 Dec; 14(6):401-7. PubMed ID: 8307244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reflectance Measures from Infant Ears With Normal Hearing and Transient Conductive Hearing Loss.
    Voss SE; Herrmann BS; Horton NJ; Amadei EA; Kujawa SG
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):560-71. PubMed ID: 27050773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Longitudinal development of wideband reflectance tympanometry in normal and at-risk infants.
    Hunter LL; Keefe DH; Feeney MP; Fitzpatrick DF; Lin L
    Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 340():3-14. PubMed ID: 26712451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of negative middle ear pressure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and application of a compensation procedure in humans.
    Sun XM; Shaver MD
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 19194291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of ear canal pressure and age on wideband absorbance in young infants.
    Aithal S; Aithal V; Kei J
    Int J Audiol; 2017 May; 56(5):346-355. PubMed ID: 28599603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic characteristics of the middle ear in neonates.
    Murakoshi M; Yoshida N; Sugaya M; Ogawa Y; Hamanishi S; Kiyokawa H; Kakuta R; Yamada M; Takahashi R; Tanigawara S; Matsutani S; Kobayashi T; Wada H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Apr; 77(4):504-12. PubMed ID: 23312352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ear-canal acoustic admittance and reflectance measurements in human neonates. II. Predictions of middle-ear in dysfunction and sensorineural hearing loss.
    Keefe DH; Gorga MP; Neely ST; Zhao F; Vohr BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):407-22. PubMed ID: 12558278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of static middle ear pressure on transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products.
    Plinkert PK; Bootz F; Vossieck T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1994; 251(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 8024768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aspects of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in healthy newborns.
    Kok MR; van Zanten GA; Brocaar MP
    Hear Res; 1993 Sep; 69(1-2):115-23. PubMed ID: 8226331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ear-canal acoustic admittance and reflectance effects in human neonates. I. Predictions of otoacoustic emission and auditory brainstem responses.
    Keefe DH; Zhao F; Neely ST; Gorga MP; Vohr BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):389-406. PubMed ID: 12558277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How does the sound pressure generated by circumaural, supra-aural, and insert earphones differ for adult and infant ears?
    Voss SE; Herrmann BS
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):636-50. PubMed ID: 16377999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.