806 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26857448)
1. Women's preferences and mode of delivery in public and private hospitals: a prospective cohort study.
Mazzoni A; Althabe F; Gutierrez L; Gibbons L; Liu NH; Bonotti AM; Izbizky GH; Ferrary M; Viergue N; Vigil SI; Zalazar Denett G; Belizán JM
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Feb; 16():34. PubMed ID: 26857448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Women's preference for caesarean section and the actual mode of delivery - Comparing five sites in Norway.
Lindstad Løvåsmoen EM; Nyland Bjørgo M; Lukasse M; Schei B; Henriksen L
Sex Reprod Healthc; 2018 Jun; 16():206-212. PubMed ID: 29804768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.
Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK
Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors.
Karlström A; Nystedt A; Johansson M; Hildingsson I
Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 20630634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study.
Liu NH; Mazzoni A; Zamberlin N; Colomar M; Chang OH; Arnaud L; Althabe F; Belizán JM
Reprod Health; 2013 Jan; 10(1):2. PubMed ID: 23317141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cognitive factors related to childbirth and their effect on women's delivery preference: a comparison between a private and public hospital in Tehran.
ChoobMasjedi SG; Hasani J; Khorsandi M; Ghobadzadeh M
East Mediterr Health J; 2012 Nov; 18(11):1127-33. PubMed ID: 23301375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Going public: do risk and choice explain differences in caesarean birth rates between public and private places of birth in Australia?
Miller YD; Prosser SJ; Thompson R
Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):627-35. PubMed ID: 22877762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors associated with Chinese nulliparous women's choices of mode of delivery: A longitudinal study.
Zhang Z; Gu C; Zhu X; Ding Y; Simone S; Wang X; Tao H
Midwifery; 2018 Jul; 62():42-48. PubMed ID: 29653417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why?
Angeja AC; Washington AE; Vargas JE; Gomez R; Rojas I; Caughey AB
BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1253-8. PubMed ID: 17014679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Women's antenatal preferences for delivery route in a setting with high cesarean section rates and a medically dominated maternity system.
Dweik D; Girasek E; Töreki A; Mészáros G; Pál A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Apr; 93(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 24575805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Caesarean section at maternal request--the differing views of patients and healthcare professionals: a questionnaire based study.
Sharpe AN; Waring GJ; Rees J; McGarry K; Hinshaw K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Sep; 192():54-60. PubMed ID: 26151240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A longitudinal observational study of preference for elective caesarean section among nulliparous Hong Kong Chinese women.
Pang MW; Lee TS; Leung AK; Leung TY; Lau TK; Leung TN
BJOG; 2007 May; 114(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 17355362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of the experience of childbirth between women who preferred and had a caesarean section and women who preferred and had a vaginal birth.
Karlström A; Nystedt A; Hildingsson I
Sex Reprod Healthc; 2011 Aug; 2(3):93-9. PubMed ID: 21742287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influencing factors associated with the mode of birth among childbearing women in Hunan Province: a cross-sectional study in China.
Shi Y; Jiang Y; Zeng Q; Yuan Y; Yin H; Chang C; Pang R
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 May; 16():108. PubMed ID: 27185247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.
Bonzon M; Gross MM; Karch A; Grylka-Baeschlin S
Midwifery; 2017 Jul; 50():219-227. PubMed ID: 28478374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Women's views on elective primary caesarean section.
Pakenham S; Chamberlain SM; Smith GN
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2006 Dec; 28(12):1089-1094. PubMed ID: 17169232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What are women's mode of birth preferences and why? A systematic scoping review.
Coates D; Thirukumar P; Spear V; Brown G; Henry A
Women Birth; 2020 Jul; 33(4):323-333. PubMed ID: 31607640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-medical factors affecting antenatal preferences for delivery route and actual delivery mode of women in southwestern Iran.
Rajabi A; Maharlouei N; Rezaianzadeh A; Rajaeefard A; Keshavarzi S; Lankarani KB; Gholami A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3622-8. PubMed ID: 26753876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pregnant women's preference for cesarean section and subsequent mode of birth - a six-country cohort study.
Ryding EL; Lukasse M; Kristjansdottir H; Steingrimsdottir T; Schei B;
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Sep; 37(3):75-83. PubMed ID: 27269591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Change of childbirth preference after delivery among nulliparous Chinese women and their partners.
Li WY; Liabsuetrakul T; Stray-Pedersen B
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jan; 40(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 24102777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]