BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26857480)

  • 1. Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):473-88. PubMed ID: 26857480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sleep can reduce the testing effect: it enhances recall of restudied items but can leave recall of retrieved items unaffected.
    Bäuml KH; Holterman C; Abel M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1568-81. PubMed ID: 24933697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sleep reduces the testing effect-But not after corrective feedback and prolonged retention interval.
    Abel M; Haller V; Köck H; Pötschke S; Heib D; Schabus M; Bäuml KT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):272-287. PubMed ID: 29698042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.
    Carpenter SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19857026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing promotes long-term learning via stabilizing activation patterns in a large network of brain areas.
    Keresztes A; Kaiser D; Kovács G; Racsmány M
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Nov; 24(11):3025-35. PubMed ID: 23796945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention and the testing effect.
    Mulligan NW; Picklesimer M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):938-50. PubMed ID: 26618913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A dual memory theory of the testing effect.
    Rickard TC; Pan SC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):847-869. PubMed ID: 28585057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distinct slow and fast cortical theta dynamics in episodic memory retrieval.
    Pastötter B; Bäuml KT
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jul; 94():155-161. PubMed ID: 24632089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals.
    Rowland CA; DeLosh EL
    Memory; 2015; 23(3):403-19. PubMed ID: 24579674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does Item Difficulty Affect the Magnitude of the Retrieval Practice Effect? An Evaluation of the Retrieval Effort Hypothesis.
    Lima MFR; Venâncio S; Feminella J; Buratto LG
    Span J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 23():e31. PubMed ID: 32772963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transfer-appropriate processing in the testing effect.
    Veltre MT; Cho KW; Neely JH
    Memory; 2015; 23(8):1229-37. PubMed ID: 25345914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does retrieval practice enhance learning and transfer relative to restudy for term-definition facts?
    Pan SC; Rickard TC
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Sep; 23(3):278-292. PubMed ID: 28358548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Test-potentiated learning: three independent replications, a disconfirmed hypothesis, and an unexpected boundary condition.
    Wissman KT; Rawson KA
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):406-414. PubMed ID: 28691577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Test-potentiated learning of motor sequences.
    Tempel T; Kubik V
    Memory; 2017 Mar; 25(3):326-334. PubMed ID: 27099043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional underpinnings of feedback-enhanced test-potentiated encoding.
    Ludowicy P; Czernochowski D; Arnaez-Telleria J; Gurunandan K; Lachmann T; Paz-Alonso PM
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 May; 33(10):6184-6197. PubMed ID: 36585773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing enhances subsequent learning in older adults.
    Pastötter B; Bäuml KT
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Mar; 34(2):242-250. PubMed ID: 30335442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of testing on subsequent re-encoding and long-term forgetting of action-relevant materials: On the influence of recall type.
    Kubik V; Nilsson LG; Olofsson JK; Jönsson FU
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 56(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 26243692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing and feedback effects on front-end control over later retrieval.
    Thomas RC; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):437-50. PubMed ID: 22732026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benefits from retrieval practice are greater for students with lower working memory capacity.
    Agarwal PK; Finley JR; Rose NS; Roediger HL
    Memory; 2017 Jul; 25(6):764-771. PubMed ID: 27531308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diminishing-cues retrieval practice: A memory-enhancing technique that works when regular testing doesn't.
    Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1868-1876. PubMed ID: 28849580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.