These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26857813)

  • 1. Critical review of methods for risk ranking of food-related hazards, based on risks for human health.
    Van der Fels-Klerx HJ; Van Asselt ED; Raley M; Poulsen M; Korsgaard H; Bredsdorff L; Nauta M; D'agostino M; Coles D; Marvin HJP; Frewer LJ
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2018 Jan; 58(2):178-193. PubMed ID: 26857813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk ranking of foodborne parasites: State of the art.
    Devleesschauwer B; Bouwknegt M; Dorny P; Gabriël S; Havelaar AH; Quoilin S; Robertson LJ; Speybroeck N; Torgerson PR; van der Giessen JWB; Trevisan C
    Food Waterborne Parasitol; 2017; 8-9():1-13. PubMed ID: 32095638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk ranking for foodborne microbial hazards in New Zealand: burden of disease estimates.
    Lake RJ; Cressey PJ; Campbell DM; Oakley E
    Risk Anal; 2010 May; 30(5):743-52. PubMed ID: 19645753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrating epidemiological and economic models to identify the cost of foodborne diseases.
    Aragrande M; Canali M
    Exp Parasitol; 2020 Mar; 210():107832. PubMed ID: 32004854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and application of a comparative risk assessment method for ranking chemical hazards in food.
    Li Y; Liang G; Zhang L; Liu Z; Yang D; Li J; Sun G; Zhou P
    Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2021 Jan; 38(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 33275871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. FDA-iRISK--a comparative risk assessment system for evaluating and ranking food-hazard pairs: case studies on microbial hazards.
    Chen Y; Dennis SB; Hartnett E; Paoli G; Pouillot R; Ruthman T; Wilson M
    J Food Prot; 2013 Mar; 76(3):376-85. PubMed ID: 23462073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a risk-ranking framework to evaluate potential high-threat microorganisms, toxins, and chemicals in food.
    Newsome R; Tran N; Paoli GM; Jaykus LA; Tompkin B; Miliotis M; Ruthman T; Hartnett E; Busta FF; Petersen B; Shank F; McEntire J; Hotchkiss J; Wagner M; Schaffner DW
    J Food Sci; 2009 Mar; 74(2):R39-45. PubMed ID: 19323766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the applicability of currently available methods for attributing foodborne disease to sources, including food and food commodities.
    Pires SM
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2013 Mar; 10(3):206-13. PubMed ID: 23489045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Actual problems of the microbiological safety of food products].
    Fedorenko EV; Kolomiets ND; Sychik SI
    Gig Sanit; 2016; 95(9):873-8. PubMed ID: 29431324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Food, health, and complexity: towards a conceptual understanding to guide collaborative public health action.
    Majowicz SE; Meyer SB; Kirkpatrick SI; Graham JL; Shaikh A; Elliott SJ; Minaker LM; Scott S; Laird B
    BMC Public Health; 2016 Jun; 16():487. PubMed ID: 27277001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence-based semiquantitative methodology for prioritization of foodborne zoonoses.
    Cardoen S; Van Huffel X; Berkvens D; Quoilin S; Ducoffre G; Saegerman C; Speybroeck N; Imberechts H; Herman L; Ducatelle R; Dierick K
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2009 Nov; 6(9):1083-96. PubMed ID: 19715429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Food safety considerations for innovative nutrition solutions.
    Byrd-Bredbenner C; Cohn MN; Farber JM; Harris LJ; Roberts T; Salin V; Singh M; Jaferi A; Sperber WH
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Jul; 1347():29-44. PubMed ID: 25943305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Streamlined analysis for evaluating the use of preharvest interventions intended to prevent Escherichia coli O157:H7 illness in humans.
    Withee J; Williams M; Disney T; Schlosser W; Bauer N; Ebel E
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2009 Sep; 6(7):817-25. PubMed ID: 19737060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Information systems in food safety management.
    McMeekin TA; Baranyi J; Bowman J; Dalgaard P; Kirk M; Ross T; Schmid S; Zwietering MH
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Dec; 112(3):181-94. PubMed ID: 16934895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk ranking of pathogens in ready-to-eat unprocessed foods of non-animal origin (FoNAO) in the EU: initial evaluation using outbreak data (2007-2011).
    Da Silva Felício MT; Hald T; Liebana E; Allende A; Hugas M; Nguyen-The C; Johannessen GS; Niskanen T; Uyttendaele M; McLauchlin J
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Feb; 195():9-19. PubMed ID: 25500275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of predictive models to optimize risk of decisions.
    Baranyi J; Buss da Silva N
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 240():19-23. PubMed ID: 27908577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk assessment for infectious foodborne diseases: a priority with problems.
    Potter ME; Brudney JL
    J Agromedicine; 2004; 9(2):59-69. PubMed ID: 19785206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microbiological food safety issues in Brazil: bacterial pathogens.
    Gomes BC; Franco BD; De Martinis EC
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2013 Mar; 10(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 23489044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating the burden of foodborne diseases in Japan.
    Kumagai Y; Gilmour S; Ota E; Momose Y; Onishi T; Bilano VL; Kasuga F; Sekizaki T; Shibuya K
    Bull World Health Organ; 2015 Aug; 93(8):540-549C. PubMed ID: 26478611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microbiological food safety: a dilemma of developing societies.
    Akhtar S; Sarker MR; Hossain A
    Crit Rev Microbiol; 2014 Nov; 40(4):348-59. PubMed ID: 23173983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.