244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26859058)
1. On the potential cost effectiveness of scientific audits.
Click JL
Account Res; 1989 Sep; 1(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 26859058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Public participation in data audits.
McGarity TO
Account Res; 1989 Sep; 1(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 26859055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fraud, errors and gamesmanship in experimental toxicology.
Purchase IF
Toxicology; 2004 Sep; 202(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 15331181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A successful system of scientific data audits for clinical trials. A report from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.
Weiss RB; Vogelzang NJ; Peterson BA; Panasci LC; Carpenter JT; Gavigan M; Sartell K; Frei E; McIntyre OR
JAMA; 1993 Jul; 270(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 8320783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of data audits in detecting scientific misconduct. Results of the FDA program.
Shapiro MF; Charrow RP
JAMA; 1989 May; 261(17):2505-11. PubMed ID: 2704109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. AICPA standard aids in detecting risk factors for fraud. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Reinstein A; Dery RJ
Healthc Financ Manage; 1999 Oct; 53(10):48-50. PubMed ID: 11066667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fraud and deceit in published medical research.
Lohsiriwat V; Lohsiriwat S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Oct; 90(10):2238-43. PubMed ID: 18041448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical and legal considerations in a case of research fraud.
Kvaal SI
J Am Coll Dent; 2008; 75(2):29-35. PubMed ID: 18777891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?
Claxton LD
Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 15652224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of field auditing in environmental quality assurance management.
Claycomb DR
Qual Assur; 2000; 8(3-4):189-94. PubMed ID: 12008887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Why good accountants do bad audits.
Bazerman MH; Loewenstein G; Moore DA
Harv Bus Rev; 2002 Nov; 80(11):96-102, 134. PubMed ID: 12422793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A tale of two perspectives: regulation versus self-regulation. A financial reporting approach (from Sarbanes-Oxley) for research ethics.
Richman V; Richman A
Sci Eng Ethics; 2012 Jun; 18(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 21365474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Financial auditing and fraud detection: Implications for scientific data audit.
Pincus KV
Account Res; 1989 Sep; 1(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 26859056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adverse events reporting--the tip of an iceberg.
Shamoo AE
Account Res; 2001; 8(3):197-218. PubMed ID: 12481780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perspective: Innocence and due diligence: managing unfounded allegations of scientific misconduct.
Goldenring JR
Acad Med; 2010 Mar; 85(3):527-30. PubMed ID: 20182133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Environmental auditing and the role of the accountancy profession: a literature review.
de Moor P; de Beelde I
Environ Manage; 2005 Aug; 36(2):205-19. PubMed ID: 15995890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Practical considerations for conducting effective billing audits.
Bacon RF
Healthc Financ Manage; 2002 Apr; 56(4):36-9. PubMed ID: 11963596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Integrity in science: a constant concern].
Drenth PJ
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2004; 66(5-6):321-33. PubMed ID: 15641563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Good practice is a means for preventing fraud in clinical research].
Maisonneuve H
Rev Med Interne; 1996; 17(10):846-51. PubMed ID: 8976980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
