242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26859058)
21. Using routine, independent, scientific-data audits as an early-warning for potentially fraudulent toxic-site cleanup: PCE, TCE, and other VOCs at the former Naval-Ordnance Test Station, Pasadena, California.
Shrader-Frechette K; Meade T
Account Res; 2020 Jan; 27(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 31838886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Conflicts of interest in medical science: peer usage, peer review and 'CoI consultancy'.
Charlton BG
Med Hypotheses; 2004; 63(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15236772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effects of audits and fines on upcoding in neonatology.
Groß M; Jürges H; Wiesen D
Health Econ; 2021 Aug; 30(8):1978-1986. PubMed ID: 33951233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A risk-based approach to scheduling audits.
Rönninger S; Holmes M
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2009; 63(6):575-88. PubMed ID: 20169864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Misconduct in medical research. A questionnaire survey among project leaders in health region 4].
Hals A; Jacobsen G
Nord Med; 1994; 109(3):85-8. PubMed ID: 8139903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Change in argonne national laboratory: a case study.
Mozley A
Science; 1971 Oct; 174(4004):30-8. PubMed ID: 17755685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.
Resnik DB
Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Perceptions of new AICPA (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants) audit guide.
Bitter ME; Cassidy J
Healthc Financ Manage; 1992 Nov; 46(11):38, 40-2, 44-8. PubMed ID: 10145712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.
Johnston PG; Daly PA; Liu E
Oncologist; 1999; 4(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 10545862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Addressing medical coding and billing part II: a strategy for achieving compliance. A risk management approach for reducing coding and billing errors.
Adams DL; Norman H; Burroughs VJ
J Natl Med Assoc; 2002 Jun; 94(6):430-47. PubMed ID: 12078924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Never audit alone--the case for audit teams.
Adams NH
Qual Assur; 1999; 7(4):195-200. PubMed ID: 11246485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science.
Stroebe W; Postmes T; Spears R
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2012 Nov; 7(6):670-88. PubMed ID: 26168129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Auditing research studies.
Rudy EB; Kerr ME
Nurs Res; 2000; 49(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 10768589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives.
Wenger NS; Korenman SG; Berk R; Berry S
J Investig Med; 1997 Aug; 45(6):371-80. PubMed ID: 9291693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A view of misconduct in science.
Racker E
Nature; 1989 May; 339(6220):91-3. PubMed ID: 2716839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A profile of family planning audit in England 1994-1997.
Killick SR; Jones A
Br J Fam Plann; 1998 Jul; 24(2):72-4. PubMed ID: 9741981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Surveillance for safety after immunization: Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)--United States, 1991-2001.
Zhou W; Pool V; Iskander JK; English-Bullard R; Ball R; Wise RP; Haber P; Pless RP; Mootrey G; Ellenberg SS; Braun MM; Chen RT
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2003 Jan; 52(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 12825543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The value to blood establishments of supplier quality audit and of adopting a European Blood Alliance collaborative approach.
Nightingale MJ; Ceulemans J; Agoston S; van Mourik P; Marcou-Cherdel C; Wickens B; Johnstone P
Blood Transfus; 2014 Jan; 12(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 24553596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Misconduct and fraud in research: social and legislative issues symposium of the Society of University Surgeons.
Simmons RL; Polk HC; Williams B; Mavroudis C
Surgery; 1991 Jul; 110(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 1866681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. How is feedback from national clinical audits used? Views from English National Health Service trust audit leads.
Taylor A; Neuburger J; Walker K; Cromwell D; Groene O
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2016 Apr; 21(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 26811374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
