151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26859326)
1. HRT dependent performance and bacterial community population of granular hydrogen-producing mixed cultures fed with galactose.
Kumar G; Sivagurunathan P; Park JH; Park JH; Park HD; Yoon JJ; Kim SH
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Apr; 206():188-194. PubMed ID: 26859326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of initial lactic acid concentration, HRTs, and OLRs on bio-hydrogen production from lactate-type fermentation.
Kim TH; Lee Y; Chang KH; Hwang SJ
Bioresour Technol; 2012 Jan; 103(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 22071244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mixed-culture H
Anburajan P; Park JH; Sivagurunathan P; Pugazhendhi A; Kumar G; Choi CS; Kim SH
J Biosci Bioeng; 2017 Sep; 124(3):339-345. PubMed ID: 28528789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fermentative hydrogen production and bacterial community structure in high-rate anaerobic bioreactors containing silicone-immobilized and self-flocculated sludge.
Wu SY; Hung CH; Lin CN; Chen HW; Lee AS; Chang JS
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2006 Apr; 93(5):934-46. PubMed ID: 16329152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microbial responses to various process disturbances in a continuous hydrogen reactor fed with galactose.
Kumar G; Park JH; Sivagurunathan P; Lee SH; Park HD; Kim SH
J Biosci Bioeng; 2017 Feb; 123(2):216-222. PubMed ID: 27614820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of anti-foaming agents on biohydrogen production.
Sivagurunathan P; Anburajan P; Kumar G; Bakonyi P; Nemestóthy N; Bélafi-Bakó K; Kim SH
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Aug; 213():121-128. PubMed ID: 26995320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in performance and bacterial communities in response to various process disturbances in a high-rate biohydrogen reactor fed with galactose.
Park JH; Kumar G; Park JH; Park HD; Kim SH
Bioresour Technol; 2015; 188():109-16. PubMed ID: 25683506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hydrogen metabolic patterns driven by Clostridium-Streptococcus community shifts in a continuous stirred tank reactor.
Palomo-Briones R; Trably E; López-Lozano NE; Celis LB; Méndez-Acosta HO; Bernet N; Razo-Flores E
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Mar; 102(5):2465-2475. PubMed ID: 29335876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improvement of hydrogen fermentation of galactose by combined inoculation strategy.
Sivagurunathan P; Anburajan P; Kumar G; Arivalagan P; Bakonyi P; Kim SH
J Biosci Bioeng; 2017 Mar; 123(3):353-357. PubMed ID: 27815050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The hydraulic retention time influences the abundance of Enterobacter, Clostridium and Lactobacillus during the hydrogen production from food waste.
Santiago SG; Trably E; Latrille E; Buitrón G; Moreno-Andrade I
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2019 Sep; 69(3):138-147. PubMed ID: 31219171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biohydrogen fermentation of galactose at various substrate concentrations in an immobilized system and its microbial correspondence.
Sivagurunathan P; Pugazhendhi A; Kumar G; Park JH; Kim SH
J Biosci Bioeng; 2018 May; 125(5):559-564. PubMed ID: 29337032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of organic loading rate on biohydrogen production in an up-flow anaerobic packed bed reactor (UAnPBR).
Ferraz AD; Zaiat M; Gupta M; Elbeshbishy E; Hafez H; Nakhla G
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Jul; 164():371-9. PubMed ID: 24865326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-rate biohydrogen production from xylose using a dynamic membrane bioreactor.
Baik JH; Jung JH; Sim YB; Park JH; Kim SM; Yang J; Kim SH
Bioresour Technol; 2022 Jan; 344(Pt A):126205. PubMed ID: 34715337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Controlling methane and hydrogen production from cheese whey in an EGSB reactor by changing the HRT.
Ramos LR; de Menezes CA; Soares LA; Sakamoto IK; Varesche MBA; Silva EL
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2020 Apr; 43(4):673-684. PubMed ID: 31834467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biohydrogen production at pH below 3.0: Is it possible?
Mota VT; Ferraz Júnior ADN; Trably E; Zaiat M
Water Res; 2018 Jan; 128():350-361. PubMed ID: 29121503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anaerobic hydrogen production with an efficient carrier-induced granular sludge bed bioreactor.
Lee KS; Wu JF; Lo YS; Lo YC; Lin PJ; Chang JS
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2004 Sep; 87(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 15352063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adaptation of acidogenic sludge to increasing glycerol concentrations for biohydrogen production.
Tapia-Venegas E; Cabrol L; Brandhoff B; Hamelin J; Trably E; Steyer JP; Ruiz-Filippi G
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2015 Oct; 99(19):8295-308. PubMed ID: 26254785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biohydrogen production from Tequila vinasses in an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor: effect of initial substrate concentration, temperature and hydraulic retention time.
Buitrón G; Carvajal C
Bioresour Technol; 2010 Dec; 101(23):9071-7. PubMed ID: 20655747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Co-Fermentation of Cheese Whey and Crude Glycerol in EGSB Reactor as a Strategy to Enhance Continuous Hydrogen and Propionic Acid Production.
Lopes HJS; Ramos LR; Silva EL
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2017 Nov; 183(3):712-728. PubMed ID: 28321784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
