These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. [Study of the immediate biomechanical stability in a goat cervical spine model]. Li X; Zhou C; Song Y Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Oct; 26(5):1000-4. PubMed ID: 19947477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of the dewar and interspinous cervical spine fixation techniques. Simmons ED; Burke TG; Haley T; Medige J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Feb; 21(3):295-8; discussion 299. PubMed ID: 8742204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Stabilization method in cervical spine traumatology: implants and biomechanics]. Morscher E Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1992; 130(6):441-4. PubMed ID: 1492443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical evaluation of cervical spinal stabilization methods in a human cadaveric model. Coe JD; Warden KE; Sutterlin CE; McAfee PC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1989 Oct; 14(10):1122-31. PubMed ID: 2588063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of posterior cervical fixation. Mihara H; Cheng BC; David SM; Ohnari K; Zdeblick TA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Aug; 26(15):1662-7. PubMed ID: 11474352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro investigation of a new dynamic cervical implant: comparison to spinal fusion and total disc replacement. Welke B; Schwarze M; Hurschler C; Book T; Magdu S; Daentzer D Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2247-54. PubMed ID: 26684468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative fixation methods of cervical disc arthroplasty versus conventional methods of anterior cervical arthrodesis: serration, teeth, keels, or screws? Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Feb; 12(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 20121359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anterior cervical fusion with the Caspar instrumentation system. Tippets RH; Apfelbaum RI Neurosurgery; 1988 Jun; 22(6 Pt 1):1008-13. PubMed ID: 3419561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Limitations of the cervical porcine spine in evaluating spinal implants in comparison with human cervical spinal segments: a biomechanical in vitro comparison of porcine and human cervical spine specimens with different instrumentation techniques. Schmidt R; Richter M; Claes L; Puhl W; Wilke HJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jun; 30(11):1275-82. PubMed ID: 15928552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical comparison of bioabsorbable cervical spine interbody fusion cages. Pflugmacher R; Schleicher P; Gumnior S; Turan O; Scholz M; Eindorf T; Haas NP; Kandziora F Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Aug; 29(16):1717-22. PubMed ID: 15303013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spinal fixation. Part 1. Principles, basic hardware, and fixation techniques for the cervical spine. Slone RM; MacMillan M; Montgomery WJ Radiographics; 1993 Mar; 13(2):341-56. PubMed ID: 8460224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct. Stein MI; Nayak AN; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24231054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]