These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2686093)

  • 21. Use of ultrasonography vs clinical factors to estimate date of confinement.
    McConnon TM; Bowman WP
    J Fam Pract; 1985 Jul; 21(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 3891907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Ultrasonic diagnosis of pregnant women in general practice].
    Bratland SZ; Eik-Nes SH
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1985 Oct; 105(28):1940-6. PubMed ID: 3907002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prenatal diagnosis of urinary tract abnormalities by ultrasound.
    Helin I; Persson PH
    Pediatrics; 1986 Nov; 78(5):879-83. PubMed ID: 3532021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Determination of the expected day of delivery--ultrasound has not been shown to be more accurate than the calendar method].
    Olsen O; Clausen JA
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Mar; 160(14):2088-90. PubMed ID: 9604677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Routine ultrasound screening for early detection of small for gestational age fetuses.
    Rosendahl H; Kivinen S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Apr; 71(4):518-21. PubMed ID: 3281072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of ultrasound-estimated date of delivery in 17,450 spontaneous singleton births: do we need to modify Naegele's rule?
    Nguyen TH; Larsen T; Engholm G; Møller H
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 10461334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fetal outcome when the ultrasound estimate of the day of delivery is more than 14 days later than the last menstrual period estimate.
    Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 10461333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mid-trimester ultrasound prediction of gestational age: advantages and systematic errors.
    Källén K
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):558-63. PubMed ID: 12493044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Fears of pregnant women if prenatal examination yields or does not yield any findings].
    Kowalcek I; Lammers C; Brunk J; Bieniakiewicz I; Gembruch U
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2002 Mar; 124(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12070797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The impact of fetal, maternal and external factors on prediction of the day of delivery by the use of ultrasound.
    Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Feb; 11(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 9549835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Summary of the practice guideline 'Pregnancy and puerperium' from the Dutch College of General Practitioners].
    Wiersma TJ; Daemers DO; Oldenziel JH; Flikweert S; Assendelft WJ;
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Jan; 148(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 14753127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Prenatal diagnosis of skeletal dysplasia: case report of a fetus with multiple anomalies].
    Novakov Mikić A; Stojić S; Konstantinidis G; Ristivojević A; Krnojelac D
    Med Pregl; 2000; 53(3-4):197-201. PubMed ID: 10965689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ultrasonic prediction of fetal macrosomia in diabetic patients.
    Elliott JP; Garite TJ; Freeman RK; McQuown DS; Patel JM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Aug; 60(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 7155475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Self-decided abortion--different interpretations of 12 weeks of gestation].
    Beiske MJ; Naess L; Bergsjø P
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jun; 126(13):1738-9. PubMed ID: 16794666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Gestational sac diameter in very early pregnancy as a predictor of fetal outcome.
    Oh JS; Wright G; Coulam CB
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Sep; 20(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 12230450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of prenatal sonography performed by family practice residents.
    Brunader R
    Fam Med; 1996 Jun; 28(6):407-10. PubMed ID: 8791068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Ultrasonic examinations of pregnant women--ethical reflections].
    Sande HA
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 Oct; 111(26):3202-3. PubMed ID: 1948948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Ultrasonography in primary health care--experiences within obstetrics 1983-99].
    Johansen I; Grimsmo A; Nakling J
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2002 Aug; 122(20):1995-8. PubMed ID: 12555445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the dating of gestation via the growth adjusted sonographic age method.
    Simon NV; Levisky JS; Siegle JC; Shearer DM
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1984 May; 12(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 6427282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Should all pregnant women be offered an ultrasound examination?
    Bases R
    Med J Aust; 1990 May; 152(10):557. PubMed ID: 2187150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.