These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26861210)
1. Dissociating proactive and reactive control in the Stroop task. Gonthier C; Braver TS; Bugg JM Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):778-88. PubMed ID: 26861210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tango of control: The interplay between proactive and reactive control. Viviani G; Visalli A; Montefinese M; Vallesi A; Ambrosini E J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jun; 153(6):1644-1670. PubMed ID: 38661633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attention modulation by proportion congruency: the asymmetrical list shifting effect. Abrahamse EL; Duthoo W; Notebaert W; Risko EF J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1552-62. PubMed ID: 23565794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dissociating proactive and reactive control in older adults. Ball BH; Peper P; Bugg JM Psychol Aging; 2023 Jun; 38(4):323-332. PubMed ID: 37104786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Working memory capacity and Stroop interference: global versus local indices of executive control. Meier ME; Kane MJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):748-759. PubMed ID: 22774858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Going, going, gone? Proactive control prevents the congruency sequence effect from rapid decay. Duthoo W; Abrahamse EL; Braem S; Notebaert W Psychol Res; 2014 Jul; 78(4):483-93. PubMed ID: 24077774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance feedback promotes proactive but not reactive adaptation of conflict-control. Bejjani C; Tan S; Egner T J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Apr; 46(4):369-387. PubMed ID: 32223290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stroop proactive control and task conflict are modulated by concurrent working memory load. Kalanthroff E; Avnit A; Henik A; Davelaar EJ; Usher M Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):869-75. PubMed ID: 25257710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level. Bugg JM; Hutchison KA J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):433-49. PubMed ID: 22845037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Item-specific control of attention in the Stroop task: Contingency learning is not the whole story in the item-specific proportion-congruent effect. Spinelli G; Lupker SJ Mem Cognit; 2020 Apr; 48(3):426-435. PubMed ID: 31705394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The hot-hand fallacy in cognitive control: repetition expectancy modulates the congruency sequence effect. Duthoo W; Wühr P; Notebaert W Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Aug; 20(4):798-805. PubMed ID: 23371807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A spatial version of the Stroop task for examining proactive and reactive control independently from non-conflict processes. Spinelli G; Lupker SJ Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1259-1286. PubMed ID: 38691237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bilingualism and executive attention: Evidence from studies of proactive and reactive control. Spinelli G; Goldsmith SF; Lupker SJ; Morton JB J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jun; 48(6):906-927. PubMed ID: 34843340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modulation of brain activity during a Stroop inhibitory task by the kind of cognitive control required. Grandjean J; D'Ostilio K; Phillips C; Balteau E; Degueldre C; Luxen A; Maquet P; Salmon E; Collette F PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e41513. PubMed ID: 22911806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The next trial will be conflicting! Effects of explicit congruency pre-cues on cognitive control. Bugg JM; Smallwood A Psychol Res; 2016 Jan; 80(1):16-33. PubMed ID: 25522873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proactive control of irrelevant task rules during cued task switching. Bugg JM; Braver TS Psychol Res; 2016 Sep; 80(5):860-76. PubMed ID: 26215433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reactive and proactive control adjustments under increased depressive symptoms: insights from the classic and emotional-face Stroop task. Saunders B; Jentzsch I Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 May; 67(5):884-98. PubMed ID: 24070406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Topographical differences of frontal-midline theta activity reflect functional differences in cognitive control abilities. Eschmann KCJ; Bader R; Mecklinger A Brain Cogn; 2018 Jun; 123():57-64. PubMed ID: 29524859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anxiety, emotional distraction, and attentional control in the Stroop task. Kalanthroff E; Henik A; Derakshan N; Usher M Emotion; 2016 Apr; 16(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 26571078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]