These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26861216)

  • 1. Single-Word Recognition Need Not Depend on Single-Word Features: Narrative Coherence Counteracts Effects of Single-Word Features that Lexical Decision Emphasizes.
    Teng DW; Wallot S; Kelty-Stephen DG
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Dec; 45(6):1451-1472. PubMed ID: 26861216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Brain activation for lexical decision and reading aloud: two sides of the same coin?
    Carreiras M; Mechelli A; Estévez A; Price CJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Mar; 19(3):433-44. PubMed ID: 17335392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.
    Balota DA; Chumbley JI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Jun; 10(3):340-57. PubMed ID: 6242411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developmental surface dyslexias.
    Friedmann N; Lukov L
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1146-60. PubMed ID: 18761129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2.
    Brysbaert M; Stevens M; Mandera P; Keuleers E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Mar; 42(3):441-58. PubMed ID: 26501839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beyond the initial 140 ms, lexical decision and reading aloud are different tasks: An ERP study with topographic analysis.
    Mahé G; Zesiger P; Laganaro M
    Neuroimage; 2015 Nov; 122():65-72. PubMed ID: 26244274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks.
    Piercey CD; Joordens S
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):657-66. PubMed ID: 10946548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: word frequency effects and individual differences.
    Schilling HH; Rayner K; Chumbley JI
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Nov; 26(6):1270-81. PubMed ID: 9847550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual differences in Cantonese Chinese word recognition: Insights from the Chinese Lexicon Project.
    Lim RY; Yap MJ; Tse CS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Apr; 73(4):504-518. PubMed ID: 32019427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Developmental Lexicon Project: A behavioral database to investigate visual word recognition across the lifespan.
    Schröter P; Schroeder S
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Dec; 49(6):2183-2203. PubMed ID: 28130729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Word Frequency Effects for LEET Lettering in Word Recognition.
    Grabbe JW
    Am J Psychol; 2016; 129(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 27029105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical models of morphology predict eye-tracking measures during visual word recognition.
    Lehtonen M; Varjokallio M; Kivikari H; Hultén A; Virpioja S; Hakala T; Kurimo M; Lagus K; Salmelin R
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1245-1269. PubMed ID: 31102191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some neurophysiological constraints on models of word naming.
    Binder JR; Medler DA; Desai R; Conant LL; Liebenthal E
    Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):677-93. PubMed ID: 15921937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERPs reflect lexical identification in word fragment priming.
    Friedrich CK; Kotz SA; Friederici AD; Gunter TC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 May; 16(4):541-52. PubMed ID: 15165347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of frequency trajectory.
    Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ; Raoul A; Kaye M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 29683706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A diffusion decision model analysis of evidence variability in the lexical decision task.
    Tillman G; Osth AF; van Ravenzwaaij D; Heathcote A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1949-1956. PubMed ID: 28265864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does bold emphasis facilitate the process of visual-word recognition?
    Macaya M; Perea M
    Span J Psychol; 2014; 17():E2. PubMed ID: 25012276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisiting age-of-acquisition effects in Spanish visual word recognition: the role of item imageability.
    Wilson MA; Cuetos F; Davies R; Burani C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1842-59. PubMed ID: 23751009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phonological-lexical activation: A lexical component or an output buffer? Evidence from aphasic errors.
    Romani C; Galluzzi C; Olson A
    Cortex; 2011 Feb; 47(2):217-35. PubMed ID: 20163794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.