These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26861562)
1. The near field/far field model with constant application of chemical mass and exponentially decreasing emission of the mass applied. Nicas M J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016 Jul; 13(7):519-28. PubMed ID: 26861562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting benzene vapor concentrations with a near field/far field model. Nicas M; Neuhaus J J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Sep; 5(9):599-608. PubMed ID: 18615292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating benzene exposure at a solvent parts washer. Nicas M; Plisko MJ; Spencer JW J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 May; 3(5):284-91. PubMed ID: 16595380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A decoupling method to compute near field and far field exposure concentrations. Nicas M Ann Work Expo Health; 2024 Jan; 68(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 37935627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Revisiting the effect of room size and general ventilation on the relationship between near- and far-field air concentrations. Cherrie JW; Maccalman L; Fransman W; Tielemans E; Tischer M; Van Tongeren M Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Nov; 55(9):1006-15. PubMed ID: 22021819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of deterministic workplace exposure assessment models for various contaminant source, air inlet, and exhaust locations. Feigley CE; Bennett JS; Khan J; Lee E AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2002; 63(4):402-12. PubMed ID: 12486773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the near field/far field model and the advanced reach tool (ART) model V1.5: exposure estimates to benzene during parts washing with mineral spirits. LeBlanc M; Allen JG; Herrick RF; Stewart JH Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2018 Mar; 221(2):231-238. PubMed ID: 29133136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Daubert standard as applied to exposure assessment modeling using the two-zone (NF/FF) model estimation of indoor air breathing zone concentration as an example. Jayjock MA; Armstrong T; Taylor M J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Nov; 8(11):D114-22. PubMed ID: 22017382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Interzonal airflow rates for use in near-field far-field workplace concentration modeling. Keil C; Zhao Y J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Oct; 14(10):793-800. PubMed ID: 28609198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Airborne benzene exposures from cleaning metal surfaces with small volumes of petroleum solvents. Hollins DM; Kerger BD; Unice KM; Knutsen JS; Madl AK; Sahmel JE; Paustenbach DJ Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2013 Jun; 216(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23088855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeled comparisons of health risks posed by fluorinated solvents in a workplace spill scenario. Jayjock M; Logan P; Mader B; Owens J; Eldridge J; Costello M; Morken M; Lieder P Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Mar; 55(2):202-13. PubMed ID: 20841319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating well-mixed room and near-field-far-field model performance under highly controlled conditions. Arnold SF; Shao Y; Ramachandran G J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Jun; 14(6):427-437. PubMed ID: 28475481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modelling the time profiles of organic solvent concentrations for occupational exposure assessment purposes. Persoons R; Maitre A; Bicout DJ Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 May; 55(4):421-35. PubMed ID: 21320948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting room vapor concentrations due to spills of organic solvents. Keil CB; Nicas M AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(4):445-54. PubMed ID: 12908858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using a spreadsheet to compute contaminant exposure concentrations given a variable emission rate. Nicas M; Armstrong TW AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 12809543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of mathematical models for exposure assessment with computational fluid dynamic simulation. Bennett JS; Feigley CE; Khan J; Hosni MH Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Jan; 15(1):131-44. PubMed ID: 10712068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison study using a mathematical model and actual exposure monitoring for estimating solvent exposures during the disassembly of metal parts. Spencer JW; Plisko MJ J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Apr; 4(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 17365496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Models for nearly every occasion: Part IV - Two-box decreasing emission models. Ganser GH; Hewett P J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Nov; 14(11):919-930. PubMed ID: 28650727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-zone model application to breathing zone and area welding fume concentration data. Boelter FW; Simmons CE; Berman L; Scheff P J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 May; 6(5):298-306. PubMed ID: 19266377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]