489 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26861582)
1. 3D Printout Models vs. 3D-Rendered Images: Which Is Better for Preoperative Planning?
Zheng YX; Yu DF; Zhao JG; Wu YL; Zheng B
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(3):518-23. PubMed ID: 26861582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utility of 3D Reconstruction of 2D Liver Computed Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Images as a Surgical Planning Tool for Residents in Liver Resection Surgery.
Yeo CT; MacDonald A; Ungi T; Lasso A; Jalink D; Zevin B; Fichtinger G; Nanji S
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):792-797. PubMed ID: 28822820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of individualized 3D-printed models of pancreatic cancer to improve surgeons' anatomic understanding and surgical planning.
Song C; Min JH; Jeong WK; Kim SH; Heo JS; Han IW; Shin SH; Yoon SJ; Choi SY; Moon S
Eur Radiol; 2023 Nov; 33(11):7646-7655. PubMed ID: 37231071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usefulness of Three-Dimensional Modeling in Surgical Planning, Resident Training, and Patient Education.
Andolfi C; Plana A; Kania P; Banerjee PP; Small S
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 May; 27(5):512-515. PubMed ID: 27813710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical planning with patient-specific three-dimensional printed pancreaticobiliary disease models - Cross-sectional study.
Bati AH; Guler E; Ozer MA; Govsa F; Erozkan K; Vatansever S; Ersin MS; Elmas ZN; Harman M
Int J Surg; 2020 Aug; 80():175-183. PubMed ID: 32622058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of a Patient-Specific, 3-Dimensionally Printed Endoscopic Sinus and Skull Base Surgical Model.
Hsieh TY; Cervenka B; Dedhia R; Strong EB; Steele T
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Jul; 144(7):574-579. PubMed ID: 29799965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A low-cost surgical application of additive fabrication.
Watson RA
J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 24411417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do Three-dimensional Visualization and Three-dimensional Printing Improve Hepatic Segment Anatomy Teaching? A Randomized Controlled Study.
Kong X; Nie L; Zhang H; Wang Z; Ye Q; Tang L; Li J; Huang W
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 26868314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient-centered oncosurgical planning with cancer models in subspecialty education.
Guler E; Ozer MA; Bati AH; Govsa F; Erozkan K; Vatansever S; Ersin MS; Elmas NZ
Surg Oncol; 2021 Jun; 37():101537. PubMed ID: 33711767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D printing for preoperative planning and surgical training: a review.
Ganguli A; Pagan-Diaz GJ; Grant L; Cvetkovic C; Bramlet M; Vozenilek J; Kesavadas T; Bashir R
Biomed Microdevices; 2018 Aug; 20(3):65. PubMed ID: 30078059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of 3-Dimensional Printing in a Case of Osteogenesis Imperfecta for Patient Education, Anatomic Understanding, Preoperative Planning, and Intraoperative Evaluation.
Eisenmenger LB; Wiggins RH; Fults DW; Huo EJ
World Neurosurg; 2017 Nov; 107():1049.e1-1049.e7. PubMed ID: 28823657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Training in Cerebral Aneurysm Clipping Using Self-Made 3-Dimensional Models.
Mashiko T; Kaneko N; Konno T; Otani K; Nagayama R; Watanabe E
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(4):681-689. PubMed ID: 28110854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional brain arteriovenous malformation models for clinical use and resident training.
Dong M; Chen G; Li J; Qin K; Ding X; Peng C; Zhou D; Lin X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jan; 97(3):e9516. PubMed ID: 29504974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using 3D Printing to Create Personalized Brain Models for Neurosurgical Training and Preoperative Planning.
Ploch CC; Mansi CSSA; Jayamohan J; Kuhl E
World Neurosurg; 2016 Jun; 90():668-674. PubMed ID: 26924117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of 3D-Printed and 2D-Illustrated International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification Anatomic Models for Resident Education.
Low CM; Morris JM; Matsumoto JS; Stokken JK; O'Brien EK; Choby G
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Oct; 161(4):705-713. PubMed ID: 31284833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of 3D reconstruction cloacagrams and 3D printing in cloacal malformations.
Ahn JJ; Shnorhavorian M; Amies Oelschlager AE; Ripley B; Shivaram GM; Avansino JR; Merguerian PA
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Aug; 13(4):395.e1-395.e6. PubMed ID: 28673795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-Dimensional Modeling May Improve Surgical Education and Clinical Practice.
Jones DB; Sung R; Weinberg C; Korelitz T; Andrews R
Surg Innov; 2016 Apr; 23(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 26423911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usage of 3D models of tetralogy of Fallot for medical education: impact on learning congenital heart disease.
Loke YH; Harahsheh AS; Krieger A; Olivieri LJ
BMC Med Educ; 2017 Mar; 17(1):54. PubMed ID: 28284205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When to Introduce Three-Dimensional Visualization Technology into Surgical Residency: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Lin C; Gao J; Zheng H; Zhao J; Yang H; Zheng Y; Cao Y; Chen Y; Wu G; Lin G; Yu J; Li H; Pan H; Liao Q; Zhao Y
J Med Syst; 2019 Feb; 43(3):71. PubMed ID: 30739210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional Printing and Augmented Reality: Enhanced Precision for Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy.
Wake N; Bjurlin MA; Rostami P; Chandarana H; Huang WC
Urology; 2018 Jun; 116():227-228. PubMed ID: 29801927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
