194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26861755)
1. Long-menu questions in computer-based assessments: a retrospective observational study.
Cerutti B; Blondon K; Galetto A
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Feb; 16():55. PubMed ID: 26861755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of long-menu and single-best-answer multiple choice questions in computer-based summative assessments: a randomised controlled trial.
Cerutti B; Stollar F; Escher M; Blondon K; Aujesky S; Nendaz M; Galetto-Lacour A
BMC Med Educ; 2019 Jun; 19(1):219. PubMed ID: 31215430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between Long-Menu and Open-Ended Questions in computerized medical assessments. A randomized controlled trial.
Rotthoff T; Baehring T; Dicken HD; Fahron U; Richter B; Fischer MR; Scherbaum WA
BMC Med Educ; 2006 Oct; 6():50. PubMed ID: 17032439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions.
Holland J; O'Sullivan R; Arnett R
BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():184. PubMed ID: 26502882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychometrics of Multiple Choice Questions with Non-Functioning Distracters: Implications to Medical Education.
Deepak KK; Al-Umran KU; AI-Sheikh MH; Dkoli BV; Al-Rubaish A
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2015; 59(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 27530011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pick-N multiple choice-exams: a comparison of scoring algorithms.
Bauer D; Holzer M; Kopp V; Fischer MR
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2011 May; 16(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 21038082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electronic assessment of clinical reasoning in clerkships: A mixed-methods comparison of long-menu key-feature problems with context-rich single best answer questions.
Huwendiek S; Reichert F; Duncker C; de Leng BA; van der Vleuten CPM; Muijtjens AMM; Bosse HM; Haag M; Hoffmann GF; Tönshoff B; Dolmans D
Med Teach; 2017 May; 39(5):476-485. PubMed ID: 28281369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of an interactive case simulation system in dermatology and venereology for medical students.
Wahlgren CF; Edelbring S; Fors U; Hindbeck H; Ståhle M
BMC Med Educ; 2006 Aug; 6():40. PubMed ID: 16907972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimum accepted competency examination: test item analysis.
McCrossan P; Nicholson A; McCallion N
BMC Med Educ; 2022 May; 22(1):400. PubMed ID: 35614439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical assessment in the age of digitalisation.
Egarter S; Mutschler A; Tekian A; Norcini J; Brass K
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Mar; 20(1):101. PubMed ID: 32234051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determinants of Difficulty and Discriminating Power of Image-based Test Items in Postgraduate Radiological Examinations.
Rutgers DR; van Raamt F; van der Gijp A; Mol C; Ten Cate O
Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):665-672. PubMed ID: 29198947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and validation of immediate self-feedback very short answer questions for medical students: practical implementation of generalizability theory to estimate reliability in formative examination designs.
Lertsakulbunlue S; Kantiwong A
BMC Med Educ; 2024 May; 24(1):572. PubMed ID: 38789958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of very short answer versus single best answer questions for undergraduate assessment.
Sam AH; Hameed S; Harris J; Meeran K
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):266. PubMed ID: 27737661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing narrative and multiple-choice formats in online communication skill assessment.
Kim S; Spielberg F; Mauksch L; Farber S; Duong C; Fitch W; Greer T
Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychometric properties and podiatric medical student perceptions of USMLE-style items in a general anatomy course.
D'Antoni AV; DiLandro AC; Chusid ED; Trepal MJ
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2012; 102(6):517-28. PubMed ID: 23204205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Design principles for virtual patients: a focus group study among students.
Huwendiek S; Reichert F; Bosse HM; de Leng BA; van der Vleuten CP; Haag M; Hoffmann GF; Tönshoff B
Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):580-8. PubMed ID: 19493183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using Automatic Item Generation to Improve the Quality of MCQ Distractors.
Lai H; Gierl MJ; Touchie C; Pugh D; Boulais AP; De Champlain A
Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 26849247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using the computer-assisted medical problem-solving (CAMPS) system to identify students' problem-solving difficulties.
Schwartz W
Acad Med; 1992 Sep; 67(9):568-71. PubMed ID: 1520411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. It takes only 100 true-false items to test medical students: true or false?
Pamphlett R
Med Teach; 2005 Aug; 27(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 16147803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Peer review improves psychometric characteristics of multiple choice questions.
Abozaid H; Park YS; Tekian A
Med Teach; 2017 Apr; 39(sup1):S50-S54. PubMed ID: 28103718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
