These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26862034)
1. Statistical analysis and handling of missing data in cluster randomized trials: a systematic review. Fiero MH; Huang S; Oren E; Bell ML Trials; 2016 Feb; 17():72. PubMed ID: 26862034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical analysis and handling of missing data in cluster randomised trials: protocol for a systematic review. Fiero M; Huang S; Bell ML BMJ Open; 2015 May; 5(5):e007378. PubMed ID: 25971707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trials. Ma J; Akhtar-Danesh N; Dolovich L; Thabane L; BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():18. PubMed ID: 21324148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are missing data adequately handled in cluster randomised trials? A systematic review and guidelines. Díaz-Ordaz K; Kenward MG; Cohen A; Coleman CL; Eldridge S Clin Trials; 2014 Oct; 11(5):590-600. PubMed ID: 24902924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increased risk of type I errors in cluster randomised trials with small or medium numbers of clusters: a review, reanalysis, and simulation study. Kahan BC; Forbes G; Ali Y; Jairath V; Bremner S; Harhay MO; Hooper R; Wright N; Eldridge SM; Leyrat C Trials; 2016 Sep; 17(1):438. PubMed ID: 27600609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiple imputation methods for handling missing data in cost-effectiveness analyses that use data from hierarchical studies: an application to cluster randomized trials. Gomes M; Díaz-Ordaz K; Grieve R; Kenward MG Med Decis Making; 2013 Nov; 33(8):1051-63. PubMed ID: 23913915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of population-averaged and cluster-specific models for the analysis of cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes: a simulation study. Ma J; Raina P; Beyene J; Thabane L BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jan; 13():9. PubMed ID: 23343209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methodological review showed that time-to-event outcomes are often inadequately handled in cluster randomized trials. Caille A; Tavernier E; Taljaard M; Desmée S J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jun; 134():125-137. PubMed ID: 33581243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Missing data handling in non-inferiority and equivalence trials: A systematic review. Rabe BA; Day S; Fiero MH; Bell ML Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):477-488. PubMed ID: 29797777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment of missing data in follow-up studies of randomised controlled trials: A systematic review of the literature. Sullivan TR; Yelland LN; Lee KJ; Ryan P; Salter AB Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):387-395. PubMed ID: 28385071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Generalized estimating equations in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: Review of practice and simulation study. Huang S; Fiero MH; Bell ML Clin Trials; 2016 Aug; 13(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 27094487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials in rheumatoid arthritis: the reporting and handling of missing data in composite outcomes. Ibrahim F; Tom BD; Scott DL; Prevost AT Trials; 2016 Jun; 17(1):272. PubMed ID: 27255212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adherence to key recommendations for design and analysis of stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: A review of trials published 2016-2022. Nevins P; Ryan M; Davis-Plourde K; Ouyang Y; Pereira Macedo JA; Meng C; Tong G; Wang X; Ortiz-Reyes L; Caille A; Li F; Taljaard M Clin Trials; 2024 Apr; 21(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 37990575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Handling missing data in RCTs; a review of the top medical journals. Bell ML; Fiero M; Horton NJ; Hsu CH BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Nov; 14():118. PubMed ID: 25407057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A pattern-mixture model approach for handling missing continuous outcome data in longitudinal cluster randomized trials. Fiero MH; Hsu CH; Bell ML Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(26):4094-4105. PubMed ID: 28783884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: which analyses should be used? Leyrat C; Morgan KE; Leurent B; Kahan BC Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 47(1):321-331. PubMed ID: 29025158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Bayesian and classical methods in the analysis of cluster randomized controlled trials with a binary outcome: the Community Hypertension Assessment Trial (CHAT). Ma J; Thabane L; Kaczorowski J; Chambers L; Dolovich L; Karwalajtys T; Levitt C BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jun; 9():37. PubMed ID: 19531226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unequal cluster sizes in stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: a systematic review. Kristunas C; Morris T; Gray L BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e017151. PubMed ID: 29146637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials - a practical guide with flowcharts. Jakobsen JC; Gluud C; Wetterslev J; Winkel P BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):162. PubMed ID: 29207961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Properties and pitfalls of weighting as an alternative to multilevel multiple imputation in cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes under covariate-dependent missingness. Turner EL; Yao L; Li F; Prague M Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 May; 29(5):1338-1353. PubMed ID: 31293199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]